下面是小编为大家整理的GRE写作如何冲刺高分（共含6篇），供大家参考借鉴，希望可以帮助到有需要的朋友。同时，但愿您也能像本文投稿人“吸塑模”一样，积极向本站投稿分享好文章。
GRE写作：高分冲刺
1.要有可以模仿的文章(最好是带有说理性的文章)。
2.你要理解这个文章，理解它的用词、句子结构、段落结构。
3.这些文章都有正确的中文翻译。同时，文章的长度不能超过500字。
怎么模仿，首先要分析文章，分析每一句和上一句是什么关系。我给大家举个例子：美国人写作文的一个特点是，通常每段的第一句都包含了整段文字的内容，也就是我们常说的topic sentence.。另一个特点是当你写完一个句子后，你要问WHY。你提出一个问题，然后给出一个圆满的回答，这就是一篇优秀的作文。
具体化的能力
具体化并不代表要写一个完整的故事。但是任何一篇文章都要给人一个具体的意向。通过具体的东西来描述才能给人踏实的感觉。具体化只要举出几个地方、几个名字、几件小事就可以了。
为什么好多同学作文中分数很低呢，就是因为他提出了问题却没有回答。
你通过不断地模仿写作，就可以不断地纠正语法和词组错误。如何把抽象和具体结合起来是一个重点，如何在一个段落中只表达一个思想，这是另一个重点。美国人的判分特点是，如果你在一段中表达了一个以上的思想，那你的分数就不会高了。
分析完一篇文章后，怎么模仿着写呢?就是看着中文的翻译，把上面的英文一字不落的写下来，当你实在想不起来的时候，再看原文。等到写完之后，和原文对照一下，看看是谁写得漂亮。我刚刚开始模仿写作的时候发现，模仿了几天后，写作水平的确提高了。
因为根据记忆学原则，这个单词你背过、读过，它都不能写在你的文章中间。如果一个单词可以经常出现在你的脑子和文章中间，那这只证明了一件事，就是你写过这个字。但是你自己写作你不可能用到这个字，那就只有一个可能，就是你在模仿文章时写过这个字。如果一个结构别人写不出来，你能写出来，那你的分数就会高。
通过不断地模仿你的几大能力就会得到提高：
1.你的语法错误会越来越少;
2.句子结构能力越来越强;
3.用词能力大大增加。
GRE写作满分范文赏析
Six months ago the region of Forestville increased the speed limit for vehicles traveling on the region's highways by ten miles per hour. Since that change took effect, the number of automobile accidents in that region has increased by 15 percent. But the speed limit in Elmsford, a region neighboring Forestville, remained unchanged, and automobile accidents declined slightly during the same six-month period. Therefore, if the citizens of Forestville want to reduce the number of automobile accidents on the region's highways, they should campaign to reduce Forestville's speed limit to what it was before the increase.
This argument does not have any concrete information. It seems by Forestville, increasing their speed limit more accidents occured. We all know that accidents occur reguardless of what the speed limit of the highway we travel. Fortunately, Elmsford's accidents decreased during the six-months in discussion. This could be because of good weather, careful drivers, or any number of situations. On the other hand, Forrestville had an increase in accidents. The only determining factor given was the speed limit increasing. This in fact probably did play a big role in why there was a 15% percent increase in the accidents, but may not be the only factor. In order to make an accurate judgement on why there was an increase in automobile accidents the situation needs to be researched. Solid facts need to be stated. Clearly, to reduce the speed limit back to normal in Forrestville would not eliminate the problem. Comments:
This limited critique is plainly flawed. The author begins with a criticism about the lack of “concrete information” but then fails to provide any concrete analysis in the response. The writer cites the drop in Elmsford's accidents but does not develop any of the reasons mentioned to account for the drop: “good weather, careful drivers, or any number of situations.”
The writer then goes on to discuss Forestville and suggests that the speed limit “may not be the only factor,” but this point is not developed either. The author issues a generic call for more research and facts and offers an unsupported conclusion of his or her own: “Clearly, to reduce the speed limit?
would not eliminate the problem.” Although the author appears to know that there is something wrong with the argument, he or she does not seem to know how to critique the argument in greater detail.
The response demonstrates adequate control of the elements of writing, but the analysis is so underdeveloped that it cannot earn a score higher than 3.
GRE写作满分范文赏析
Six months ago the region of Forestville increased the speed limit for vehicles traveling on the region's highways by ten miles per hour. Since that change took effect, the number of automobile accidents in that region has increased by 15 percent. But the speed limit in Elmsford, a region neighboring Forestville, remained unchanged, and automobile accidents declined slightly during the same six-month period. Therefore, if the citizens of Forestville want to reduce the number of automobile accidents on the region's highways, they should campaign to reduce Forestville's speed limit to what it was before the increase.
At first look, this seems to be a very well presented arguement. A logical path is followed throughout the paragraph and the conclusion is expected. However, upon a second consideration, it is apparent that all possibilities were not considered when the author presented his conclusion (or at least that s/he did not present all of the possibilities). There are numerous potential explanations for why the number of accidents in Elmsford decreased while the number in Forestville increased. Although it seems logical to assume that the difference in the percentage of accidents was due to the difference in whether or not the speed limit had been increased during the specified month, this does not necessarily mean that the speed limit should be reduced back to what it originally was in Forestville. The author does not state two specific pieces of information that are important before a conclusion such as the one the author made is sound. The first is that it is not expressed whether the speed limits in the two neighboring regions had had the same speed limit before Forestville's speed limit had been increased. If they had originally been the same, then it is reasonable to conclude that Forestville's speed limit should be reduced back to what it was before the increase. However, if the two region's speed limits were initially different, then such a conclusion can not be made. The second piece of information that is necessary for the present argument is the relative number of accidents in each of the areas prior to the increase in speed limit. For the author to make the presented conclusion, the number of accidents should have been approximately equal prior to the increase in the speed limit in Forestville. If the two missing pieces of information had been presented and were in the author's favor, then the conclusion that the author made would have been much more sound than it currently is. In conclusion, the argument is not entirely well reasoned, but given the information that was expressed in the paragraph, it was presented well, and in a logical order. Comments:
This competent critique claims that there are “numerous potential explanations for why the number of accidents in Elmsford decreased while the number in Forestville increased.” However, the author discusses only two points:
-- whether the speed limits in the two regions were originally the same; and
-- the number of accidents in each region prior to Forestville's raising the speed limit.
Although the response appears at first to be well developed, there is much less analysis here than the length would suggest. The first third and last third of the essay are relatively insubstantial, consisting mainly of general summary statements (e.g., “A logical path??? conclusion is expected” and “If the two??? more sound than it currently is”). The real heart of the critique consists of minimal development of the two points mentioned above. Therefore, although two important features of the argument are analyzed and the writer handles language and syntax adequately, the lack of substantial development keeps this critique from earning a score higher than 4.
GRE写作如何冲刺高分
GRE写作满分要点和技巧建议：必须研究范文
研究范文，尤其是5分和6分的范文是非常重要的。因为范文可以说是最权威的辅导资料。要求不是简单的熟读和背诵，而是逐字逐句的体会作者的意思及修辞。看范文的同时也要看ETS对范文的评论，非常精彩，也可以参考学习。这会非常有利于理解考试所考的重点。
GRE写作满分要点和技巧建议：必须要熟练
必须要做到形成惯性思维，考试时间非常紧张，只有有充分思维准备的人，才能驾轻就熟，运用自如。题目中提到politics，大脑中就应当出现Franklin Roosevelt， Lincoln， Gerhard Schroeder， Gandhi; 提到art，就该想到Rembrandt， Van Gogh， Starry night， night watch， Hemmingway， the old man and the sea; 提到Scandal，就该想到Nixon，Watergate，bill Clinton，sex sandal，Enron。总之，熟练非常重要.
GRE写作满分要点和技巧建议：借鉴别人的文章
学习他人的文章和写作思路，是提高自己水平的有效途径。参考优秀的高分满分作文，学习词汇和句式的用法，总结经验心得，对于自己的提升也是巨大的。
GRE写作满分要点和技巧建议：多动脑筋多思考
多写不如多改，多改不如多想，针对写作思路，自我总结，思考适合自己的写作方式，思考自己擅长的论证方法，总之，要多想。活跃思维的同时也提高了思考能力。
GRE写作满分要点和技巧建议：通读GRE作文题库
GRE作文的题库是完全开放的，考前把题目都过一遍，了解其中的思路和写作方式，在考试中碰到可以大量节省时间，提高写作效率。
以上就是GRE写作拿到满分的一些要点和技巧建议，GRE高分甚至满分作文需要生动的词汇及正确的语法、严密的逻辑结构，新鲜的论据等，希望各位考生都能从中学到一些东西，预祝大家取得圆满的成绩。
GRE写作满分范文赏析
The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??
“According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies.”??
The?argument?presented?above?is?relatively?sound,?however,?the?author?fails?to?recognize?all?the?elements?necessary?to?evaluate?his?situation.??The?idea?that?more?money?be?invested?in?advertising?may?be?a helpful?one,?but?perhaps?not?because?people?are?unaware?of?the?current?reviews.??To?clarify,?it?may?be?necessary?to?advertise?more?in?order?to?increase?sales,?however?that?could?be?due?to?many?circumstances?such?as?a?decrease?in?the?public's?overall?attendance,?an?increase?in?the?cost?of?movies,?or?a?lack?of?trust?in?the?opinions?of?the?reviewers.??
The?advertising?director?first?needs?to?determine?the?relative?proportion?of?movie?goers?that?choose?to?see?Silver?Screen?films.??That?will?help?him?to?understand?his?market?share.??If?the?population?in?general?is?attending?less,?then?he?may?still?be?out-profiting?his?competitors,?despite?his?individual?sales?decrease.??In?fact,?his?relative?sales?could?be?increasing.??Determining?where?he?stands?in?his?market?will?help?him?to?create?and?implement?an?action?plan.??
Another?important?thing?to?consder?is?the?relative?cost?of?attending?movies?to?the?current?standard?of?living.??If?the?standard?of?living?is?decreasing,?it?may?contribute?to?an?overall?decrease?in?attendance.??In?that?case,?advertising?could?be?very?helpful,?in?that?a?clever?campaign?could?emphasize?the?low?cost?of?movies?as?compared?to?many?other?leisure?activities.??This?could?offset?financial?anxieties?of?potential?customers.??
Finally,?it?is?important?to?remember?that?people?rarely?trust?movie?reviewers.??For?that?reason,?it?is?important?that?the?films?appeal?to?the?populus,?and?not?critics?alone.??The?best?advertisement?in?many?cases?is?word?of?mouth.??No?matter?what?critics?say,?people?tend?to?take?the?opinions?of?friends?more?seriously.??This?supports?continual?funding?to?produce?quality?movies?that?will?appeal?to?the?average?person.??
There?is?no?reason?that?silver?screen?should?not?spend?more?on?advertisement,?however,?there?is?reason?to?continue?to?invest?in?diverse,?quality?films.??Furthermore,?the?company?must?consider?carefully?what?it?chooses?to?emphasize?in?its?advertisement.??
Commentary??
Although?the?response?begins?by?stating?that?the?argument?“is?relatively?sound,”?it?immediately?goes?on?to?develop?a?critique.??The?response?identifies?three?major?flaws?in?the?argument?and?provides?a?careful?and?thorough?analysis.??The?main?points?discussed?are?that??
--?the?fall-off?in?attendance?might?be?industry?wide?
--?the?general?state?of?the?economy?might?have?affected?movie????attendance?
--?movie?goers?“rarely?trust?movie?reviewers”??
Each?of?these?points?is?developed;?together?they?are?presented?within?the?context?of?a?larger?idea:?that?while?spending?more?money?on?advertising?may?be?helpful,?the?company?should?“continue?to?invest?in?diverse,?quality?films.”??
This?is?a?smoothly?written,?well-developed?analysis?in?which?syntactic?variety?and?the?excellent?use?of?transitions?make?for?a?virtually?seamless?response.??This?paper?clearly?merits?a?score?of?6.
GRE写作高分范文：公正的法律
“There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws。”
有两种法律：公正和不公正的。每个社会成员都有责任遵守公正的法律，但更重要的是，更应该不遵守和反抗不公正的法律。
关键词：obey just lawsdisobey and resist unjust laws
GRE写作范文：
论证分析
当我们面对司法改革，提出探讨司法理念时，往往会以“什么是司法的公正”、“什么是法官的美德”等这样的形式提出问题。这种形式的问题所问的是关于一般的公正和美德的问题。在司法的实践中，对于具体的判决，人们一般是能够评判是否公正的，而问题是评判有无共性呢?如果不存在，那么人们的评判又是以什么为标准的呢?如果存在，那它又是怎样存在的呢?存在于哪里?而依照西方哲学的观点，这种存在于我们可感知的具体事物之外的东西就是法的理念。
众所周知，亚里土多德曾说过，要实现法治必须具备两个因素：其一，所有人都服从法律;其二，被遵守的法律本身是良好的法律。 亚里土多德的说法看似全面，但在实践中可能并不有效。
比如什么是良法，比如有人对允许堕胎、安乐死、同性恋的法律持有尖锐不同的观点。人认为允许堕胎维护了女性的自身权利，允许安乐死和同性恋表现了对个人自由意志和愿望的尊重;有人则认为允许堕胎是不人道的，没有保护胎儿的生存权利，允许安乐死违背了人的生存主旨，允许同性恋则败坏了社会的道德风气。在这种情况下，我们应当认定谁的观念是正确的?
我们又依据什么权力和所谓的理性剥夺和否定另外一些人的观念呢?此外，人们对某一事物的好坏认识会随时间的推移而发生变化，从前认为良好的法律现在可能认为不好，这时又怎么办呢?
因此，当认为某些法律不是良好的法律时，人们便会认为自己没有服从的义务，这样便会出现不服从法律的现象。进而言之，坚持“良好的法律”这一概念可能会使法治处于困难的境地。
Should we obey an unjust law? According to the theory of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 18th century French political philosopher, in a democratic society the state represents the general will of the citizens, and that in obeying its laws each citizen is pursuing his own real interests. Thus, in an ideal state, laws express the general will. An individual who disagrees with a law must be failing to look at things from the moral standpoint. Rousseau is talking about an ideal state where laws express people's general will, a will that aims at the common good. But the question is: are we living in an ideal state and do all the laws of our land express the common will of the people and should we obey all the laws even if they are unjust? Thenswer to this question can be different for different people.
GRE写作：怎样利用模板冲刺高分
1.要有可以模仿的文章(最好是带有说理性的文章)。
2.你要理解这个文章，理解它的用词、句子结构、段落结构。
3.这些文章都有正确的中文翻译。同时，文章的长度不能超过500字。
怎么模仿，首先要分析文章，分析每一句和上一句是什么关系。我给大家举个例子：美国人写作文的一个特点是，通常每段的第一句都包含了整段文字的内容，也就是我们常说的topic sentence.。另一个特点是当你写完一个句子后，你要问WHY。你提出一个问题，然后给出一个圆满的回答，这就是一篇优秀的作文。
再下一步就要具体了。写作需要三大能力：
一、具体化的能力
具体化并不代表要写一个完整的故事。但是任何一篇文章都要给人一个具体的意向。通过具体的东西来描述才能给人踏实的感觉。具体化只要举出几个地方、几个名字、几件小事就可以了。
为什么好多同学作文中分数很低呢，就是因为他提出了问题却没有回答。
你通过不断地模仿写作，就可以不断地纠正语法和词组错误。如何把抽象和具体结合起来是一个重点，如何在一个段落中只表达一个思想，这是另一个重点。美国人的判分特点是，如果你在一段中表达了一个以上的思想，那你的分数就不会高了。
分析完一篇文章后，怎么模仿着写呢?就是看着中文的翻译，把上面的英文一字不落的写下来，当你实在想不起来的时候，再看原文。等到写完之后，和原文对照一下，看看是谁写得漂亮。我刚刚开始模仿写作的时候发现，模仿了几天后，写作水平的确提高了。因为根据记忆学原则，这个单词你背过、读过，它都不能写在你的文章中间。如果一个单词可以经常出现在你的脑子和文章中间，那这只证明了一件事，就是你写过这个字。但是你自己写作你不可能用到这个字，那就只有一个可能，就是你在模仿文章时写过这个字。如果一个结构别人写不出来，你能写出来，那你的分数就会高。
通过不断地模仿你的几大能力就会得到提高：
1.你的语法错误会越来越少;
2.句子结构能力越来越强;
3.用词能力大大增加。
一篇文章模仿两次就足够了。当你模仿了10篇文章之后，你把这10篇文章再模仿一遍。等你模仿完20篇文章，你的写作能力就会大大提高了。
二、逻辑思维能力
在美国许多的写作考试中TOEFL写作是相对容易的。因为它的作文题本身非常简单，看到一个作文题你几乎就知道该怎么写。而GRE作文就相对复杂了。GRE作文方式永远是两种态度，两种方式让你选择。它永远是有对照性的。TOEFL作文考：“吃饭是在家里吃好，还是到饭店里吃好”; GMAT考和商业有关的：“产品制造出来是延续时间很长的好，还是延续时间不太长的好”;GRE作文：“在我们这个社会中间，现在专业人士太多了，而有综合知识的人太少了。你认为我们是更需要具有专业知识的人呢，还是需要具有广博知识的人?”
TOEFL考生活、学习;GRE 考日常学术行为。但是不管它出什么题目，总是会摆出两种态度供你选择。另外，GRE的作文题目是提前发给你的，考试时出的题目绝不会超出它事先发给你的题目。它决不会出让学生看不懂的题目。所出的题目永远是世界性的，不涉及民族、宗教、政治色彩。
考察普林斯顿所出的全部范文后发现，美国人百分之七八十喜欢倾向于一种模式。讨论在哪里吃的问题时，要不在家里吃，要不在饭店吃，但是你不要又想在家里，又想在饭店(A OR B)。当然他们也比较认可中间的态度(C)，也就是说，我既要A又要B，我是A和B结合起来产生C。事实上，好多中国学生结合A、B写是能写出好分数的。当然也有些题目是没有C这种态度的。
C态度这种写法和A、B的写法，在段落结构上是有差异的。我先讲两种文章的段落结构。
如果是采取A或B的写法，段落结构是比较简单的。通常分为三个层次，第一个层次是第一段。说明我要采取A还是B。第二个层次可以不只一段，说明为什么选择A/B是对的。为什么要有三段呢。因为必须至少有2个理由，至多3个理由。美国人认为一个理由是不够的，4个理由绝对太多。他们最喜欢 2到3个理由。最后一段就是结尾，讨论B的缺点和部分优点，同时坚决强调你要选择A。
C模式：它有几大难点：
1.你要表明A和B的必不可少性，所以你的段落就会很长;
2.第二段就要写A的好处、缺陷都在哪;
3.要写B的好处和缺点;
4.要证明只有把A和B结合起来才能弘扬两者的优点，避免缺点。
这样的文章是最合情合理的，优点是非常的reasonable。缺点是这种文章的长度比我们前面说到的第一种类型的文章，至少要长出1/3。而你写的越长就越容易犯句子语法和结构，以及拼写的错误。所以如果你的写作水平很一般的话，就不要用这种写法。但是如果你的写作水平很高的话，我建议你用这种写法。尤其是碰到一些我认为只有把两者结合起来才能写好的题目时。所以GRE作文难就难在它的题目比较难。这种题目有两种写作方法，这两种方法都是能拿6分的。
逻辑思维能力的第二步就是怎么写好中间这部分。开头挺好写的，好多同学直接照着题目抄，这大可不必，也挺愚蠢的。GRE作文题目也是可以抄的，但是你最好还是自己写。
千篇 一律只有几种开头的方法：
1.说大话开头法：开头就是一个宏伟的概括;
2.幽默一点的开头法。
3.从自我经历写起。
下面我们来具体讲一下中间应该怎么写。
首先来讲一下，写这三个理由要避免的几点：
.避免观点重复;不要讲了几遍其实都是一个理由。当你一点就能说明的时候，非要讲三遍就显的有点STUPID了。你要从多个方面来讲道理，而且要尽量把问题具体化。
.避免观点的庸俗化，并考虑美国人能否接受的问题。比如说要避免对任何宗教词批判太多。因为你永远搞不懂给你判分的是信什么教的。不能批判任何政治理想。不能贬低自己所在的国家。美国人最讨厌不爱自己国家的人。避免观点的庸俗化，就是我们说的有些东西可以想，但是不能写出来GRE作文逻辑思路分为两种。一种是问题发挥型，一种是argument/争论型。
对于问题发挥型题目，你怎么发挥，怎么犯逻辑错误都没有问题，只要你能保证你观点的正确，并能用具体的事实证明你的观点。而对于argument争论型题目就不同了。它的出题方式是给你一段话，这段话后再给出一个总结。然后让你挑出它的逻辑错误。需要你作的是得出它的结论或者对其加以补充。你只要拿出三点理由把它推翻就行了。这三点理由从哪里找呢，从文章里面找，从文章的周边关系找，从文章的背后找。
下面举一个例子：现在有一种计算机仪表设备，把它安在商用飞机上之后就必然能避免飞机在空中的碰撞。因为一架飞机发出碰撞信号后，另一架飞机就能接收这个信号并及时采取行动，从而避免飞机碰撞。
这里结论就是飞机必然能避免碰撞。它的因果关系是因为安装了仪表所以能够避免碰撞。你要说的是安装了仪表不一定能避免碰撞。现在你就要找出3点理由来。
1. 文章中没有任何统计数据告诉我们飞机的碰撞百分之百是商用飞机，因此如果避免碰撞，就要在所有飞行物上安装这种仪表。
2. 安装了仪表后，是否需要人来操作。如果是，那么因为有人的原因，就不能避免碰撞。
3. 要是这个仪表系统坏了。
4. 也没有谈到气候问题，卫星干扰问题等干扰因素……
所以Argument文章不需要你有文采，也不需要你有多么好的句子结构，它只是要求你的逻辑没有漏洞。
大家有时间的话务必把AI的提纲都列掉，然后挑重复率高的写。比如ISSUE里面有一道The greatest indicator of a nation....
另外有一点很重要的是，特别是对于A大家在写完几篇文章以后，尽快归纳出针对每一个instruction的模板，question这种可以写成一类，然后背出来。
其实老G和新G的区别就在于，老G是一套模板走天下，新G准备4个模板，就这么简单。以后自己练习的时候，就根据模板来套，写到后来你会发现，你写出来的文章，不管题目怎么换，写出来的东西看起来都一样，这样Argument算基本练成了。
模板最好自己写，根据头几篇写的文章来归纳，比如说我关于specific evidence这种题型，自己归纳的模板就是：
The argument is well presented and appears to be relatively sound at the first glance,the author concludes that__________. However, a close scrutiny about the argument will reveal that several specific evidences should be added in order to make the argument to be more cogent and convincing, for example:_________
Initially, the author must give evidence that_________. If we were to learn that _______, it would obviously weaken the conclusion. It may turn out to be that_____. To make his assurance eloquent, he must provide more specific evidences to consummate his argument.
Secondly, in order to______, we should also be informed that_______. In the argument, the author only said that__________. It may undermine the argument that if_______. Without knowing_______, we can hardly accept the conclusion that______
Third, the author should eliminate the disturbance of other factors, for example, he should provide evidences that _______. Perhaps_____ or perhaps________. Either of these scenarios, if true, would cast serious doubt on the author’s claim. Without accounting for all other explanations, the arguer can’t reasonably conclude that___________;
To sum up, the argument is far from powerful enough to substantiate that______________ Before any final decisions are made about_____________, much more specific evidences are to be put forward to make the author’s argument more forceful and cogent.
真正写的时候，先把第一段和最后一段都写了，然后每段写个第一句，列出框架。最好能在第一段把你要写的内容都先简要概括一下。
话题还是回到准备A的过程上，当你归纳出模板以后，接下来要做的事情就很简单了，找到新老题库的对应表，然后自己照着新题库一题一题地把提纲列出来，不会的看一下老题是怎么写的。这个时候不需要写很多文章，只是归纳提纲就行，记住归纳的时候要把可能发生的情况写出来，因为到了考试的时候想不出可以rival的情况那不是悲剧了，比如这个题中的一个evidence：
The reason why students choose Buckingham College.
Perhaps it has qualified teachers.
Perhaps tuition fee is lower than colleges at the same level.
等你把这两件事情都做完，A的准备就差不多了，以后就是每天花半个小时左右的时间一遍遍熟悉题库。
按照这种方法，我真正准备A的时间只有5天，后来的那段时间都只是每天花半个小时写3篇作文的提纲写的话不用太多，3-4天写一篇保持手感就行了。
关于ISSUE，方法也差不多，主要的问题就是写提纲一定要仔细，把你对这个问题的观点，和引用的例子都写出来，不要想着自己能套一些Roosevelt, King什么的，想想就可以了，没有那么多例子让你套，还是要老老实实准备提纲。
我写过一套完整的issue和argument的提纲，写的时候例子也放在提纲里，ISSUE跟A也一样，写完一遍提纲，自己重新看，到最后就是训练自己看到一个题，在2分钟以内迅速组织出一个比较详细的提纲。这样ISSUE的准备也就差不多了。
三.修辞学的能力
修辞学的能力也是非常重要的。比如比喻、排比等等，他们能带来力量和说服力。
GRE写作满分范文赏析
“The media (books, film, music, television, for example) tend to create rather than reflect the values of a society.”
“The media tend to create rather than reflect the values of a society”, is true because society allow the media to pusrue this in such a way.
The American culture as a whole lives through the pulse of the media world and is enthralled by movies, lyrics and film. Because of the nature by which our society is dependant on the media, the media is able to create any senses of values adaptable by our society.
This is not to say that the media is solely responsible for the values of American culture, however, our society makes this creation possible. Although there are many who will disagree with the medias portrayal of many issues, our society as a whole fuels the fire to which the media thrives on. For the most part, books, films and music are produced to sell and the media knows to which audience they are targetting.
The way in which a culture enable the media to create it's values, ultimately reflects the values of a society.
Comments:
This is a seriously flawed response to the topic because the reasoning is weak and the ideas are unclear.
The writer's position on the issue seems clear enough, but the paper presents few reasons to support that position. And even those reasons are not explained clearly. For example, the writer often refers to the means by which the media influence society (e.g., “such a way,” “the nature by which,” and “the way in which”) but fails to explain what those ideas mean or why they are important.
Problems in word choice frequently create confusion. For example, these could be interesting ideas if they were expressed clearly: “our society as a whole fuels the fire to which the media thrives on” and “the media is able to create any senses of values adaptable by our society.”
Also, many basic errors affect meaning throughout the paper: subject-verb agreement (first and last paragraphs), comma splice (third paragraph), “medias'” for “media's” (third paragraph), and “it's” for “its” (last paragraph).
The lack of clear reasons, combined with serious error in language use, keep this essay at the 2 score level.
GRE写作满分范文赏析
“The media (books, film, music, television, for example) tend to create rather than reflect the values of a society.”
The values of society have have changed so much during most recent years. Many of these values have changed for the worst. The media has been the vehicle that has taken us through these changes. The media has created so many avenues for us to take to find so many of these changes. They have created the avenues that children and young adults feel that they have to take.
Many years ago reporters and writers were telling us of all the good things that were happening in the world. You could walk into a store and eventhough there was a war going on, we would read about the soldier that left his family to fight for his country. Nowadays you walk into a store, read a book , or watch a T.V. show, and see all of the things that are happening in a very negative world.
The media is creating a society that says that it is O.K. for a man to wear earrings. That it is O.K. that marijuana is being legalized, that it is O.K. for juveniles to break the law. Why does not the media show us a professional male athlete that is also a family man? Why doesn't the author of a book or a reporter of a newspaper tell us about all of the bad things that happen to drug users and pushers? Why do the T.V. shows tell juveniles that all they get for breaking the law is a slap on the hands?
Society will be better off if the media would say, “Hey children, professional athletes can be good parents”! This would have a positive effect on the younger generation.
The media should do a better job in trying to create a good, healthy environment instead of showing us all of the bad stuff in our society. The media should show all young people the awful things that happen in juvenile hall, but that would be an infringement on the residents of the hall. Where are the rights of the people that they did not treat right?
Yes, the media is creating a bad influence in todays young people. But I believe that everything in the media can be overcome and ignored. We need to raise our children right.
Comments:
This response is simplistic in its analysis of the issue. The writer has much to say about the negative influence of media on children, arguing that the media “should do a better job in trying to create a good, healthy environment.” However, the writer never seems to consider the complexities of the issue -- for example, whether, or to what extent, the topic's claim is accurate, or whether today's media can have a positive influence, or whether society has any influence on the media.
gre考试写作高分策略分享
你需要一个gre写作策略
为什么很多考生在gre写作考试中会出现重复的问题?主要原因如下：
一。gre考试词汇储备不足
这是虚词单调的最常见原因。考生词汇量小，没有专门的文字训练和背诵，范文数量不够。没有足够的准备，他写不出各种各样的字，事实就是这样。
2.缺乏词汇掌握
作为一名合格的GRE考生，背诵大量单词是必要的。然而，在记忆单词的要求上也存在一些问题。很多人对GRE词汇背诵的要求只是相互熟悉，能够理解或大致理解词义，而很少有考生去了解句子中词汇的具体用法。这也使得考生知道了很多单词，看了大量的词汇，但当他们真正使用它们时，他们只能使用那些旧单词。
三。缺乏实践经验
一些考生可能已经意识到了背单词和掌握一些生词使用方法的重要性。然而，由于缺乏实践或无人帮助批改和复习，gre写作方法,gre写作怎么练他们不敢在实际写作中使用这些词。他们觉得自己不确定，害怕误用所以经过一轮之后，他们只能沿着一条稳定的道路，反复使用老字眼。
避免重复用词扣分
现在我们知道了重复问题的原因，相应的解决方案非常清楚。候选人需要做两件事：
一。特殊记忆写作词汇
首先，如果缺乏词汇，那么我们应该开始有意识地积累一些词汇，特别是专门用于写作的词汇。编辑建议考生可以参考GRE作文高分模式官方或权威出版物或黄金材料，从中收集一些用字不多但在模式中使用频率高的词汇，这些词汇不仅适合写作，而且可以带来高分，具有很高的实用价值。你可以在这方面积累更多的文字来代替写作和自己的习惯，这样会起到很好的效果，丰富文章的呈现形式。
2.积累更多经验
其次，如果考生害怕用生词制造问题，那么我们需要做的就是多练习。我们不必做一个完整的写作练习，我们可以专注于练习词汇替换，找到一些我们已经写过的文章，并用相同意思的词替换它们如果对词汇的使用不确定，可以通过QQ群论坛等方式查字典找例句或一般句子，帮助他人确定其使用方法，充分掌握词汇的正确使用方法，这样自然可以保证在考试中大胆使用生词，提高构词质量。
GRE作文范文：事物不会一成不变
Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.
GRE作文范文参考：
In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.
Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one
may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.
Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.
In the newly development software engineering model named Object-oriented model,the strategy “similarity first and differences later” functions as the core and focus of the whole model. Objects sharing common points are put into same “classes” and common points are processed together, later they are defined, discussed and processed respectively according to their own characteristics. This method greatly reduces the repetive time and energy spent over and over again on similar, if not utterly same, terms. Translated into daily life, starting from similarites for a quick outline and transferring to grasp distinctive characteristics for deeper understanding isthe approach we should always bear in mind when hoping to understand a thing with effectiveness and efficiency.
GRE作文范文：审查的公正性
Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.
“Censorship” is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while arousing applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.
Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word “common good” should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the “common good” is the “monarch good”, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now, in some authoritative countries, the censorship is used to rule its people by restricting their minds, of course, for the stability of their governing over the people. With these regards, censorship itself is questioned at the rationality of existing, regardless of the practices made by the democratic government, while the justice of the democratic government is quite doubtable.
The matter concerning is not only who practices the censorship but also how it is practiced. Since different men make different comments on the same work of art, for example, it is hard to set up a measure by which we could decide whether one should be prohibited, especially to the work of arts, as its content always labeled as “subversive” and “revolutionary”, two words detested by the governors most. Such cases could be found in Ulysses by J. Joyce and Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H Lawrence, these two great novels were firstly considered to be guilty of obscenity and were put to prohibition by the American government, but turned out to be true masterpieces today. So any form of censorship, to some extent, lags behind the development of ideas and will put more or less a negative effect on their development.
Though the censorship is such a disgusting word embodying so much oppression and might, it is a compromise we made with the reality far from being perfect, to provide a comparative stable ground which we could stand on. At this point, I don’t agree with the institute like ACLU who oppose any censorship. The censorship, though rarely justified, should exist as long as a more ideal and practical form is found to replace it, or we could only expect our God to create a more ideal species instead of imperfect human beings.
2.必须要熟练
重要的是形成惯性思维，gre考试写作时间真的是太紧张了，要想现场思考每句话的调理性真的是太难了，反正我没做到，写得时候手指不停的运转，远远超过了大脑运转的速度，只有有充分思维准备的人，才能驾轻就熟，运用自如。题目中提到politics，大脑中就应当出现Franklin Roosevelt， Lincoln， Gerhard Schroeder， Gandhi……; 提到ART，就该想到Rembrandt， Van G.h， Starry night， night watch， Hemmingway， the old man and the sea……; 提到Scandal，就该想到Nixon，Watergate，bill Clinton，sex sandal，Enron……总之，熟练是非常非常重要的!
3.必须多修改
如果不勤修改自己的新GRE写作，就不知道自己原来的漏洞和不足在哪，闷头写，只能导致lose the stake! 当认真学习一段时间写作之后，再回头改第一篇习作，肯定会发现自己很多毛病，这说明：我们在进步!
不管是老外280，还是版主们组织的同主题习作，都是非常宝贵的学习，参考资料，看到别人的文章和写作思路，是提高自己水平的有效途径!建议大家看看版主们原来写的习作和互拍，真的会受益匪浅!例如：among，needle，pooh，鬼谷子等牛人的，不一一列举了。
5.必须多思考
多写不如多改，多改不如多想，当然这种想不是fantasy and daydream.二是针对写作思路和自我总结，当我意识到这点时，已经太晚了!
6.必须看GRE考试的全部练习题
不要抱侥幸心理，我觉得在考试之前找到文章中出现的逻辑错误，远比在30min中为它而浪费时间值得的多。我就吃了这个亏!
7.必须多交流
听听大家的意见，有益无害。
8.必须要有自己的例子
没有哪个考官会喜欢几百号人都说Van G..h， Einstein， Curie
GRE作文范文：了解社会的方式
The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its heroines.
2018年GRE作文范文参考：
Character of a society, so complicated as it is, has always been a heated topic among social science scientists, the study of which involves people, customs, environment and various other aspects, physically and psychologically. Concerning this, the author suggests that to understand the feature and values of a society, it is best to examine the character of the men and women that the society worships, which, in my eye, gets the point in some sense despite that it ignores other measures effective in studying a society. To better present my viewpoint let me illustrate it in details.
To begin with, admittedly, since character of heroes or heroines, whether factual or imaginary, reflect, at least from a specific visual angle, mainstream values and moralities that a society and its member worship, the author's assertion gets the point in this sense. Rev. Martin Luther King, leader of the crusade fighting for equal right and against racial discrimination and segregations, is admired by the majority of American people, even scores of years after he delivered the renowned speech--“I have a dream”--that inspired and encouraged thousands of black people to strive for equal rights. This precisely mirrors one thing that all Americans ardently pursue and advocate: democracy--that is, all men are created as equal, regardless of race,nationality, and origin. Without efforts of Martin Luther King, blacks may still be separated to the back of buses and inflict what forcefully impose on them. Similarly, in the fight against gender bias, two heroines, Susan Stanton and Elizabeth B. Thorn,have been forever remembered and memorized for their contribution in paving the way for women rights, which, again, reflects that the American society is one that worships equal rights for women and men.
While the foregoing example involves heroes and heroines in social science, people,devoted themselves to natural science and humanity areas, that are admired by general populace can also aptly illustrate the credibility of the author's assertion. A society whose members worship Galileo, one who bravely and perseveringly overthrew Ptolemy and Aristotle altogether with evidence collected by turning his own-made telescope to the universe, is very likely to be one emphasizing truth and righteousness, and less likely to compromise when confront power and authority; similarly, a society whose member admire Ludwig van Beethoven, the German musician whose status is unparalleled and who composed the most famous Pathetique and Moonlight, masterpieces that have strike a cord with numerous audience, is probably one stressing artistic appreciation and the pursuit of what is eternal and universal--beauty. In short, heroes and heroines a society respect may be a mirror for the mainstream ideology and practices.
Nevertheless, by broadening this assertion to the extent that heroes and heroines are the best source of studying the character of a society, the author draws too hastily a conclusion, with other ways such as studying history, politics, legal systems, education, etc, also available. As we all know, the US is most characterized by its diversity of nationality, including Indians as native citizens, Spanish-Americans, Latin-Americans, Black-Americans, and Asians. However, to get a full understanding of this phenomenon, one can only turn to the American history, studying of which affords the answer that the War of Independence, the westward movement as well as the gold rush all contribute to this hodge-podge of nationality. Furthermore, studying of school curriculums of a society also tells us something about the contemporary and probably future characters of a society, due to the indisputable fact that children are the future and hope of a society. For example, that curriculums of American elementary and middle school are filled with courses nurturing creative thinking as well as innovative ideas and reject courses requiring pure memorization aptly show the significance of creation and innovation in American Society.
In summary, from all the discussions above, we can safely draw the conclusion that the author is fundamentally right in pointing out one way to learn the character of society. However, this assertion is somewhat one-sided in ignoring other methods, say, history and education.
GRE写作总觉得时间紧 练习从这几点做起
要么面对一道很尬聊的题无从下手，比如像面对第146原题“无聊虽然伴随着自我满足，但是它会导致尴尬”， 稍微有些思路的时候一晃眼七八分钟已经过去。
要么强迫症爆发，非要在记忆宫殿中挤出来一个高大上的事例，并且逐字逐句精雕细琢，结果时间一到，连半个屏幕都没有写满。
面对这个痛点，我作为一名在北京新东方美研精英计划中专注一对一GRE写作培训的老师，通过大量的课堂实时写作批改中总结出了5个简单粗暴的加速器。
我的原则是，实战至上，拒绝花拳绣腿，希望能够帮助大家剔除任何拖沓实战速度的累赘。
千万别跑题
提速之前，点题是3分上下的分水岭。 有些题目设计得很微妙狡猾，如果想当然地发挥没有缜密地钻透彻题目真正的用意，那么往往会导致如下现象：考完试自我感觉极为良好，但是分数一出来却很低。
比如第55原题：
The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.
这道题有的同学会讨论我们为什么和以前的人们不一样，因为科技在不断颠覆，为什么又一样，因为我们的基因没那么突变，所以我们的激素，欲望，动机还是和古人一样。
以上的思路足够能让考生自我感觉良好，但是实际上却跑题了，和题目真正想考察的点几乎不搭边儿。
注意，这里题目要讨论：学习历史的主要好处是否是让我们意识到我们和前人一样。我们应该深挖的是这个“好处”的原因。
如历史让我们知道了自己和前人有着一样的欲望。比如嗜血让我们收获的好处是，在瞬息万变的当下社会，我们可以抓住这些根本的欲望来透过问题的表象直击核心，比如古罗马人把奴隶送上角斗场上来满足他们的嗜血欲。
现今社会虽然看上去人性化了很多，但是要设计一个爆款游戏，我们还是要着手于如何满足这个没怎么变的嗜血欲， 于是便诞生了射击游戏“吃鸡”。
3个不纠结
第一，不能纠结辞藻的华丽，因为官方OG对于词汇的要求只有“effective”。
这就意味着我们是来穿着运动服跑鞋冲刺的，而非穿着礼服来品酒的，所以要表达“幸灾乐祸”， 你不必非要用8秒想出来8秒钟拼错schadenfreude，而最好用3秒钟写出来“laugh at others' bad luck”。
第二，不必纠结事例的真假，完全可以现编，因为官方OG规定hypothetical example是和real example可以一样用的。
这也很人性化，毕竟有些考题难度较大，像第36原题“It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.”，我们如果难以想到Dr.dre通过认同匪帮说唱的社会群体来定义自己的音乐风格这样的真人真事，完全可以现编一个“小红通过认同瑜伽群体来定义内心深处的静静”。
第三，不必纠结政治性对错，依然是OG的规矩“there is no right or wrong”。所以面对美国考官可以尽情批判特朗普付给艳星封口费，完全不用顾虑考官的什么爱国主义偏见而导致分数低。
考前的笨功夫
如何享受在考场上遇到一个思维熟练的考题二话不说直接提笔干倒的快感，答案无他，唯有准备。
扔掉机经，因为题目是随机抽选的，一个考场上每个人的题都是不一样的，放下原版《资本论》《奥德赛》这种软实力熏陶积淀，我们就聚焦官网上现成的题库，149道，除去重复的部分，如果准备好其中的五分之二(即60道左右)，不用全写，每道有个清晰的思路即可，那么我们就不可能遇到陌生的题，从而免去了考场上现想带来的时间浪费。
毕竟，如果你v+q 330，但是写作3分，是很尴尬的。再考一次，哪怕是考试时间都要占去4个小时。而上面提到的60来道GRE写作题，每道题花5分钟构思一下思路，总共也就5个多小时。而这些思路也可以为今后美国寂寞的冷板凳学术生活准备好足够的聊天素材。
reason(剧本)写得越细
example(电影)演得越快
文章中，对于一个观点，如果你的reason写得很有力很具体，那么自然会省去很多现编example的时间。
前文说过example可以现编故事，那么这个故事的剧本就是reason，顺着这剧本填一些人物和事迹，一个example自然就搞定。
比如，观点是：无聊是向伟大过渡的桥梁。如果你的理由可以细密到这个地步：“很多伟大的突破往往来自于人们无聊时候的遐想，因为现有的方法已经无法满足他们的好奇心，他们不堪忍受这份无聊，所以才去另辟蹊径，创造伟大。”那么这里的example就非常好编了，我们只需按照这个reason来套用“一个音乐家A，他厌倦了古典乐，所以才发明了爵士乐 ”，直接搞定example。
再次强调，如果用一个词来概括，Issue考得就是why或者why not，所以reason，作为文章的核心部分，必须有力且细密。
给自己制造方便
能不写的就不写，比如多重题干：
Claim: While boredom is often expressed with a sense of self-satisfaction, it should really be a source of embarrassment.
Reason: Boredom arises from a lack of imagination and self-motivation.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
既然写作要求只让我们讨论对两者同意与否，而没让我们讨论二者之间的关系，那我们直接把claim and reason 当成fact 1 and fact 2 ,不要自取其恼，纠结于“reason”能不能解释“claim”。
fact 1 ：虽然伴随着自我满足，但是无聊导致尴尬。
fact 2：无聊来自想象力和激情的缺失。
先写骨架，后长肉
在考场上建议先把文章的核心骨架搭好，即正反方各自的position-reason-example, 如有时间剩余，再回头长肉，即扩充细节。因为我们已经把最重要的骨架搭好了，哪怕是血肉细节不那么丰满，我们也把最重要的逻辑成分写清楚了。
拿这道题来说：
To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
反：不应该。史前社会没有城市。部落文化。
正：应该。城市代表着一个具体的功能，NYC-finance, 三番-technology
正：应该。城市之间的交互作用体现了社会的动态。A tech company in San Fransisco goes to NYC to go public.
每一段的骨架其实都可以凝缩成三句话来说，比如正方第二个观点， 我们可以先快速地把它的骨架搭好：
Another important societal characteristics revealed by studying cities is the dynamics between different functions.The reason is that no city can function alone and only through the angle of the interdependent relationship with other cities can we fully understand how cities would compete or complement each other. For example, a tech company from Shenzhen would go to Hong Kong for IPO.
这个时候如果考场还有剩余时间，我们就可以很有底气地回头填充一些细节了：
Another important societal characteristics revealed by studying cities is the dynamics between different functions.The reason is that no city can function alone and only through the angle of the interdependent relationship with other cities can we fully understand how cities would compete or complement each other. Also from this angle, we can trace the root cause of the evolution of certain parts of society and predict whether they would fade in the future. For example, a tech company from Shenzhen would go to Hong Kong for IPO…..
★ gre高分作文
