以下是小编整理的GRE写作：和提纲哪个重要（共含8篇），欢迎阅读分享。同时，但愿您也能像本文投稿人“物语”一样，积极向本站投稿分享好文章。
GRE写作：模板和提纲哪个重要
(1)早点整理出自己的模板，什么是模板，应该怎么准备，会在下面的部分为G亲们说明，所以不用着急。
(2)考试的时候顺序把握好，先读题，形成思路和粗略提纲敲首段，中间每段的主旨句和过渡段，最后敲尾段，根据时间，有层次地补充丰满每段的内容检查拼写语法错误，平时练习的时候就是不断地重复这样的顺序，做到非常熟悉。
(3)狂写，练打字速度，尤其是练自己的模板、固定段落、常用事例的打字速度。当初用Issue部分的时间就可以把Issue和Argu全部写完，Issue上600，Argu上550;平时正常写的话，Issue可以上700，Argu上600，靠的就是固定段落、事例还有模板的打字特别快，基本上Issue模板250字在几分钟之内就搞定了，Argu的模板就更夸张了，总共才500多字，模板就有一大半，而且基本上几分钟之内就可以完全打完。
在备考新GRE作文的过程中，其实是否准备网络流传的“高频”题目并不重要，而重要的是，无论准备什么题目，都能有正确的思考路径和分析方法，并且能够用正确的语言来表达自己的想法。
GRE写作满分范文赏析
“In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists — people who can provide broad perspectives.”
Generalists have the ideas and beliefs of what America is made of. America's wealth of knowledge can be related to the generalists of the past generations and the original leaders of our Constitution Period that helped shape our great nation. If our former leaders would have not been generalists when creating our country's Constitution in the late 1770's, American generations of would have been burdened with the constant understanding that they are doomed to failure.
The fact that our past leaders were not specialists gave the creation of the Constitution the ability to be changed through amendments passed by our represented leaders of today. The Constitution was created with the ability to adapt to the countries needs and demands in running our society as it changes over time. The generalists approach to this creation of a non-specialized Constitution shows the need for todays generations to continue with the beliefs that a specialist would not follow.
America has learned from it's past and has done what it can to make the changes through adaption. America's greatness has been from the generalist leaders of the past, thinking for the Americans of the future. Americans with a broad perspective is what will continue to lead our great nation into the twenty-first century.
COMMENTARY
This response displays some competence but is flawed by imprecise use of language and limited analysis of the issue.
The writer supports the claim that generalists are preferable to specialists, offering as evidence the historical example of the generalists who created the U.S. Constitution. The example, while relevant, is not adequately developed. The middle paragraph traces the flexibility of the U.S. Constitution to the generalist orientation of 18th century leaders, but the ideas in the first paragraph are too vaguely expressed to contribute to this discussion, and the final paragraph consists of unsubstantiated generalities.
Frequent minor errors in punctuation, pronoun use, and verb tense, as well as imprecise syntax and phrasing (e.g., “Generalists have the ideas and beliefs of what America is made of. ” and “...gave the creation of the Constitution the ability to...”) contribute to the overall inadequacy of this response.
GRE写作满分范文赏析
“In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists — people who can provide broad perspectives.”
The need for generalists is undeniable but one can not underestimate the need and importance of specialists. The medical profession is a good example of an area that requires both generalists and specialists. If there were no generalists in the profession there would be no one to help patients determine when a specialist was needed. There are certain problems that a general practitioner can take care of and there are other problems that are out of his or her league. The general practitioner is the an appropriate place to start when a patient develops a problem. Many times the general practitioner is more than capable of handling problems that arise and other times he or she is unable to fully take control of the patient's care. It isn't a fault with the general practitioners. There is just too much to know for any one person to be an expert on all topics. It takes people years to become experts on a single topic, never mind being an expert on everything in the medical profession.
I am currently working in a large teaching hospital where the need for both general practitioners and specialists is obvious. When a patient is admitted to a general medicine floor, the general medicine physicians are not always able to deal with every problem the patient has without some help from the specialists. It would be unrealistic, not to mention unfair to the general practitioners, to expect the general practitioners to know everything about everything. The key is to know where everyone's knowledge and area of expertise lie and use their strengths to optimize patient care.
On the general medicine team in which I worked, the team would constantly be requesting consults from specialists. Whether it be a renal, psychiatric, orthopedic, rehabilitation, speech, gastroenterologist, or any other specialist, their input was constantly needed and used to get the patient well as quickly as possible. The list of specialists can go on longer than one would think and it is just impossible for one person to know everything about each one of them.
Although the need for generalists is apparent, it would be hard to survive without specialists, also. When a person acts as a generalist, they know little bit about everything, but certainly not a totally inclusive knowledge of everything. The specialist is there to help add the expertise and inclusive knowledge that the generalist may be lacking. The most important thing to remember with specialists and generalists is to recognize both's strengths and weaknesses and capitalize on the strengths to achieve whatever goal may be desired.
COMMENTARY
Overall, this is a competent response to the topic. The writer disputes the claim that “specialists are over-rated” and argues from the position that both specialists and generalists are needed. The single extended example clearly supports the premise of the argument as the writer compares the roles and responsibilities of generalists and specialists in the medical profession. By paragraph 3, however, the discussion falters, and the concluding paragraph does little more than repeat ideas presented in the first two paragraphs.
This essay displays generally adequate control over syntax and usage, and the word choice, while appropriate, lacks precision.
GRE写作：如何拟定提纲
1、什么时候开始练习在模考时加入新GRE作文提纲?
比较适合的是在最后10天到一周的样子。因为这首先需要在一定高强度的写作练习之后，再者，需要对题目已经有了一定的把握。很多的提纲在之前都大体列过。然后在限时中加入提纲的写作。
2、用多长时间列GRE作文提纲?
我的经验是ISSUE总体比ARGU短。ISSUE大体要2-3分钟，ARGU怎么都要3分钟。可能要5分钟。
3、新GRE作文提纲里都要包含些什么?
对ISSUE来说，读第一遍题目时把关键词提出来，接着将核心话题列出来，根据这个话题开始一条一条列出你要写的东西;ARGU来说，因为题目比较长，所以读题的时间就要比前者长。
第一遍建议先把每一个意群讲的是什么简要提出来，排上序号;第二从这些小短句分析其文章结构和主要错误;第三把自己对错误的阐述顺序列出来。这样差不多是可以的了。
4、列GRE作文提纲的一些技巧
需要在练习中找到自己的记录法，哪种缩写是自己看得明了的。要记出来的摘要最后自己还要辨析几分钟。建议在平时列提纲的时候就有意识的做一下限定时间练习，看2-3分钟能不能把大体的框架列出来。
其他：我觉得如果正确掌握提纲的写法和时间分配问题，将是对于AW的核心实力的一种提高。对比于其他人，无论如何都是要略胜一筹的。
鼓励大家去积极尝试，发掘自己最适合的一套方法。我主要就是告诉大家，在45和30分钟内写两个提纲+ISSUE650和ARGU550+还剩平均3分钟时间检查，是绝对可以实现的。因为我自己就是例子。
GRE写作满分范文赏析
“It is unfortunate that today's educators place so much emphasis on finding out what students want to include in the curriculum and then giving it to them. It is the educators' duty to determine the curriculum and the students' duty to study what is presented to them.”
The above quotation a concrete example of a major problem in our society today. While probably stated with good intentions, the quotation misses the mark on the path education needs to follow. As our society changes, so do our educational needs, and thus our educational curriculum needs to change also.
I find fault with the quotation on two fronts. First, the quotation does not acknowledge that curriculum must change. It seems to say the educator should decide when to change the curriculum. This does not lead to optimal learning conditions, ask anyone who studied high school history out of outdated textbooks. One can also infer some students won't be taught up-to-date informationin a wide variety of areas. This can become ideologically dangerous. What happens when students are not given full teachings of such vital movements as the Equal Rights Amendment or the Constitution of their country? An unenlightened society is a grave society with little hope. Curriculum must change, and should not be left to input from a single voice.
The second argument answers who should make curriculum adjustments. Obviously the educator still plays alarge role in this matter. The students also need to be part of the decision process. The two groups need a give and take relationship when deciding topics for the classroom. If the students could benefit from learning material that is presently not taught in the classroom, it should be entered. Sex education and AIDS education classes needed to be part of the curriculum to inform young people. Those classes were added and have worked well.
A third party that has a role in curriculum development is private business, including research labs, goods and service providers, and financial businesses. By hiring employees with certain capabilities they have indirectly influenced curriculum for years. As time passes they will have more input by demanding subpar schools raise the level of student test scores in certain areas, either by stating so or by not hiring unqualified students
The quotation echoes of a time when school learning consisted of the three “R”'s and little else.
better or worse our society is much more complex now than then.
For our schools to keep pace with our society we need to adjust our curriclum to what it should be, what we want it to be, and what it needs to be. The above quotation a concrete example of a major problem in our society today. While probably stated with good intentions, the quotation misses the mark on the path education needs to follow. As our society changes, so do our educational needs, and thus our educational curriculum needs to change also.
I find fault with the quotation on two fronts. First, the quotation does not acknowledge that curriculum must change. It seems to say the educator should decide when to change the curriculum. This does not lead to optimal learning conditions, ask anyone who studied high school history out of outdated textbooks. One can also infer some students won't be taught up-to-date informationin a wide variety of areas. This can become ideologically dangerous. What happens when students are not given full teachings of such vital movements as the Equal Rights Amendment or the Constitution of their country? An unenlightened society is a grave society with little hope. Curriculum must change, and should not be left to input from a single voice.
The second argument answers who should make curriculum adjustments. Obviously the educator still plays alarge role in this matter. The students also need to be part of the decision process. The two groups need a give and take relationship when deciding topics for the classroom. If the students could benefit from learning material that is presently not taught in the classroom, it should be entered. Sex education and AIDS education classes needed to be part of the curriculum to inform young people. Those classes were added and have worked well.
A third party that has a role in curriculum development is private business, including research labs, goods and service providers, and financial businesses. By hiring employees with certain capabilities they have indirectly influenced curriculum for years. As time passes they will have more input by demanding subpar schools raise the level of student test scores in certain areas, either by stating so or by not hiring unqualified students
The quotation echoes of a time when school learning consisted of the three “R”'s and little else. For better or worse our society is much more complex now than then. For our schools to keep pace with our society we need to adjust our curriclum to what it should be, what we want it to be, and what it needs to be.
COMMENTARY
This essay presents a competent discussion of the issue. The essay's argument -- that curriculum should be determined by many voices, including that of private business -- is clearly expressed and adequately developed. The writer supports this position with relevant reasons, including an analysis of the need for private business to become involved in education. Examples are clearly relevant (e.g., sex education and AIDS education are cited as examples of how schools are offering new classes to meet the contemporary needs), and the writer uses details to help develop and illustrate important points. While the essay presents several ideas that are thought provoking -- e.g., “An unenlightened society is a grave society with little hope” -- those ideas are not expressed precisely or persuasively enough to merit a score of 5.
The conclusion is appropriate; it reinforces the main idea of the essay, that schools need to keep pace with society and adjust curricula to meet the needs of both students and employers.
The essay consistently displays adequate control over the conventions of academic writing. Sentence structure is generally adequate, although many of the sentences would benefit from restructuring and the use of transitions to more effectively communicate the writer's ideas.
For all of these reasons -- competent analysis and adequate control of the elements of writing -- this essay received a score of 4.
GRE写作满分范文赏析
“It is unfortunate that today's educators place so much emphasis on finding out what students want to include in the curriculum and then giving it to them. It is the educator's duty to determine the curriculum and the students' duty to study what is presented to them.”
As an elementary educator, I believe this stance is extremist. Educators and the public must come to a middle road. The high road and the low road are intimated in this statement. I believe the high road on this topic (from whence should curriculum come) represents a nouveau approach. Ask the students what they want to learn and study for the year; then meander, research and branch off of their interests. The low road on this topic (directly endorsed by this statement) is old fashioned and outdated. The assumptions behind this view include a magical ability by teachers to infuse reams of information, data and knowledge into students' brains that then become internalized and applied by the students.
In a complex and frightening society, we must look to the middle road. We must infuse the best of the high and the low roads. Current research has had a lot to say on curriculum development. Overreaching arguments defend the quality of students' self-directed learning. However, in order to prepare our students for this society, we must have developed the backbone and anchor for curriculum. Content and performance standards (i.e. curricula) need to be developed by the district's educators as a map for teachers. When educators provide students with choices WITHIN the map of curriculum, students relish in the freedom and take ownership for their learning.
Were we to provide students the ultimate authority in curriculum development, we would be doing an injustice not only to our students but to society as a whole. There are specific skills and abilities that need to be developed and taught -- regardless of students' (or for that matter, teachers') interest. In my profession as an elementary educator and as a parent, I value the abilities to read, write and be mathematically proficient. Those students not mastering those critical skills are at a disadvantage. We see those students become destructive or depressed. I have observed students struggling with the basics become outcasts in their own little worlds. Very young outcasts grow into adult outcasts.
I do NOT think it is unfortunate that today's educators emphasize students' interests. It IS our duty, however, to provide the parameters for their education. We can not simply state that educators determine curriculum and students follow. This is just not reality in the classrooms. When standards and curricular maps have been developed, teachers of today's children have the responsibility (yes, the duty!) to bring life to those maps. One crucial and successful way, is to provide students variety and choices within the context of “what needs to be covered.” The educator who brings curricula to life for her students and gives her students the responsibility to make choices helps to prepare our children for thriving -- not just surviving.
COMMENTARY
This response presents a well-developed analysis of the issue and displays strong control of the elements of writing. The essay argues in favor of a “middle road” position on the issue by analyzing the pros and cons of both teacher-determined and student-driven curricula. The argument is clear and well focused, supported with first-hand experience and the results of educational research.
The writer endorses a curriculum that emphasizes strong basic skills (reading, writing, and math) and reminds the reader that the teachers' ultimate responsibility should be to bring curricula to life in order to “prepare our children for thriving -- not just surviving.”
This essay displays a strong facility with written English language; the careful choice of words and carefully structured paragraphs help unify the structure of the argument. Overall, this response displays a strong command of academic writing skills and thus received a score of 5.
gre写作要不要列提纲
作用一，稳定军心。
当你有了提纲，你起码就知道先写什么后写什么了。这样你就不会在写手中的句子时又一边在慌神下面该怎么办。对于一开始的进入状态无异于定心之剂;
作用二，层次清晰。
如果碰到了以前有过提纲的那最好了，如果没有，现场列了总归比没有的要好吧。列出了提纲，无论怎么样，都要让自己的新gre写作看起来有个系统，有个层次，有个逻辑顺序，更容易取得一个理想的gre作文成绩。
虽然听上去很有用，但有人会说自己连文章都写不完，哪来多余时间写提纲?那么如何运用提纲呢?
1、什么时候开始练习在gre考试的水平测试中加入提纲?
比较适合的是在最后10天到一周的样子。因为这首先需要在一定高强度的写作练习之后，再者，需要对题目已经有了一定的把握。很多的提纲在之前都大体列过。然后在限时中加入提纲的写作。
2、用多长时间列提纲?
ISSUE总体比ARGU短。ISSUE大体要2-3分钟，ARGU怎么都要3分钟。可能要5分钟。
3、提纲里都要包含些什么?
对ISSUE来说，读第一遍题目时把关键词提出来，接着将核心话题列出来，根据这个话题开始一条一条列出你要写的东西;ARGU来说，因为题目比较长，所以读题的时间就要比前者长。第一遍建议先把每一个意群讲的是什么简要提出来，排上序号;第二从这些小短句分析其文章结构和主要错误;第三把自己对错误的阐述顺序列出来。这样差不多是可以的了。
4、列提纲的一些技巧
需要在练习中找到自己的记录法，哪种缩写是自己看得明了的。要记出来的摘要最后自己还要辨析几分钟。gre备考攻略建议在平时列提纲的时候就有意识的做一下限定时间练习，看2-3分钟能不能把大体的框架列出来。
GRE写作 如何快速突破门槛
首先，GRE写作题库是给定的，经过几年下来的前人总结，机考本身已经毫无悬念。高频，模板，例证，范文，大量资料充斥在互联网上并且被专业人士和机构总结印刷成册。考生们只销在考前花两三个月集中练习，得个申请的分数根本不成问题。基础好的人更是一两个月已足矣。但问题也随之而来了，大家都用着同样的参考资料不说，写作水平也都如出一辙，考官看来也就无法分辨孰好孰坏，唯有给出最安全的分数。
其次，因为倾向于去临阵磨枪，语言上虽然慢慢向规范的英文书面语靠拢，但仍缺乏时间上的沉淀而无法达到GRE写作本身的语言精练，一步到位的特点。仅仅做到了形似而神不似。因此观点写得稍好一点的同学，就可得到那0.5，如果有语言做支持，就可上到4。
最后，可以说大部分的写作还停留在临摹而不是独立作品的阶段。因为有着现成的模板和例证，在范文的引导下，模仿写作的结构和观点。所以往往造成一篇作文看起来是那么回事儿，但实际上又没有说透的感觉。对题目的意义和作文目的的把握还缺少透彻的理解。
综上几个原因，导致大部分虽然在考前付出无数汗水和努力的考生到最后没能达到理想4分。也针对这个问题，下面给出考生几点小小的建议，希望可以帮助到各位仍在为GRE写作4分而纠结的考生们：
1. 词汇。很多人在问，究竟需要不需要在写作前背完红宝书的单词。答案是不需要。红宝书的单词是针对笔试里的语文部分搜集整理的，与作文的关系不大。作文需要的高级仍然是那几个，therefore， however， admittedly。机器或者考官一见，马上会锁定，懂得写议论文，就靠它们几个。另外一些常用动词名词等实词的同义词要多背几组，英语的修辞不在华丽，在变幻。句型要多变，表达同种意思的词当然也要变幻。本来就单调的英语，重复是大忌。
2. 模板。模板怎么用，不是不用，而是要合理利用。因为这实在是一个可以让初学者一目了然，直奔主题的好东西。什么是结构，模板就是结构。模板是骨架，是支撑，但不是灵魂。灵魂的部分当然是文章的主旨，要靠自己在不懈的写作，不断的钻研中去摸索和寻找的。千万不可以依赖模板。一篇没有灵魂的骨架子是没法得高分的。
3. 练习。练习是一定要坚持得，从始至终。而且量变到质变的突破是需要时间的。
4. 临考。临考前的模考是为了让大家去把握时间，更好的进一步的查缺补漏。在考场上，更是要临危不乱，无论出现什么样的题目，相信自己，都是见过的，万变不离其宗，这当然需要练习时不断去完善自己的知识库。
GRE作文机经应该如何合理利用
1. 对于时间充裕的同学
机经中的高频是出现频率高的作文,没有人能保证考时一定遇到高频题. 如果还有不少时间,建议不要放弃任何一道题, 很多经验证明了，很多考生都有可能遇到有史以来第一次考到的ISSUE和ARGU题, 所以什么事情都是有可能发生的(就好象指出ARGU里的逻辑错误一样)
2. 对于时间不那么充裕的同学
如何利用GRE作文机经准备ISSUE。建议准备出现频率最高的40道ISSUE,注意这里指的频率指的是近两年的总频率,不分时间地域,同时加上本月本地出现3次以上的ISSUE题(大部分已经包括在前40道里,因此需要另外准备的不多).
拿我个人来说,我在北京考,考前准备了总频超过30次的38道ISSUE(3.8机经的数据,现在可能有更新)+5至6道北京3月出现3次以上同时未包括在这38道中的题,考试时遇到的两道 177,141分别出现39,38次,均为高频。
就我考前从各种渠道了解的信息，绝大部分人考时遇到一道频数大于30的可能性是相当大的。(也许有人会说很多人并没有来报机经，我的数据不一定可靠。这个就见仁见智了，我只是表达个人的建议，采纳与否，全是个人的自由.但无疑当考前时间不够时,准备出现机率较大的题目显然是特殊情况下的最佳选择了)
如何利用GRE作文机经准备ARGU。重要的是多熟悉题目,时间充裕的应该做到任何一道题都没有不认识的单词,不理解的语句,这样找错才能有的放矢.
时间不够的,至少把考过10次以上的题目(约90多道) 加上本月本地出现过但未列入上述90多道的题目全过一遍,弄懂每一个单词.这很重要,否则考场上碰到关键单词不认识,加上紧张,可就傻眼了.拿我来说,考时遇到的是10几频的题,幸好考前晚上刚过了一遍,否则文中有两个单词都不认识,显然会很不爽.
GRE写作：怎样准备提纲
1、什么时候开始练习在模考时加入提纲?
比较适合的是在最后10天到一周的样子。因为这首先需要在一定高强度的写作练习之后，再者，需要对题目已经有了一定的把握。很多的提纲在之前都大体列过。然后在限时中加入提纲的写作。
2、用多长时间列提纲?
我的经验是ISSUE总体比ARGU短。ISSUE大体要2-3分钟，ARGU怎么都要3分钟。可能要5分钟。
3、提纲里都要包含些什么?
对ISSUE来说，读第一遍题目时把关键词提出来，接着将核心话题列出来，根据这个话题开始一条一条列出你要写的东西;ARGU来说，因为题目比较长，所以读题的时间就要比前者长。第一遍建议先把每一个意群讲的是什么简要提出来，排上序号;第二从这些小短句分析其文章结构和主要错误;第三把自己对错误的阐述顺序列出来。这样差不多是可以的了。
4、列提纲的一些技巧
需要在练习中找到自己的记录法，哪种缩写是自己看得明了的。要记出来的摘要最后自己还要辨析几分钟。建议在平时列提纲的时候就有意识的做一下限定时间练习，看2-3分钟能不能把大体的框架列出来。
GRE写作满分范文赏析
“Both the development of technological tools and the uses to which humanity has put them have created modern civilizations in which loneliness is ever increasing.”
The technological tools we as a society have developed are not in themselves positive or negative, they are just that, tools. The uses, however, are definitely a different story. Computers, I believe at one time, were developed to save us time. Do our work more quickly for us so that we could have more leisure time to spend doing those things we enjoy. We have found now, especially those of us that are parents, that all of the leisure time we have gained is either spent watching our children learn things on the computer or creating our own unique something on the family computer. For one thing, it has become a very fun item, the computers have become more than just work related technological tools. The amount of human interaction is limited, because people in general are spending much of their leisure time doing solo on the computer. In the past, it was common for the new young exectutive to get a membership to the exercise club as a perk, where he could socialize with the upper crust. Now the new young exec. gets a car phone or a portable fax, so that he can work from whereever he is, usually doing that solo trip to somewhere. Given these as examples, I would tend to agree with the statement that lonliness has increased as a direct result.
Comments:
This response is limited in its analysis of the issue.
The writer clearly expresses the idea that “the technological tools we as a society have developed are not in themselves positive or negative.” However, the response provides only limited support for the position. The two examples are loosely connected and undeveloped; for example, the relevance of the “young executive” example is not clear because there is no transition from the preceding example of the computer. The conclusion, one sentence long, simply restates the claim made in the topic.
The awkward sentences are evidence of a limited fluency. Greater use of compound sentences could help eliminate structural problems and facilitate the communication of ideas (e.g., sentences 3 and 4 could be combined).
For all of these reasons, this is not an adequate response. It received a score of 3.
GRE写作满分范文赏析
“Both the development of technological tools and the uses to which humanity has put them have created modern civilizations in which loneliness is ever increasing.”
Looking at the above statement, I see a lot of truth to the statement . There are many ways that society has used the advanced technology in order to isolate themselves. It may or may not be a consious move, but the results are all the same. The isolation occurs in a variety of ways and in all different areas. By computerizing factories, there are more and more people working long hours by themselves, with there only companion as a computer monitor. Although the company may be getting better production, the question that needs to be ask is at what cost to their employees.
It is not only the management of big factories that are responsible for this isolation. This lonliness can be seen in many other settings. With the growing popularity of the television, the nation is seeing a decline in families talking and an increase in watching the television. Not only can this result in a generation of “coach potatoes”, it is also causes less communication and a feeling of isolation from everyone that a person cares about.
So far technology has entered the work place and the home, it has also entered the social relm. When you go to order food in the drive-thru, who is or better yet what is it that you talk to? It is a machine, although there is a person on the other end, you are still reciting your order to a machine. If it is ten o'clock at night and you need money, there are ATM's. All of these gadgets may be very nice and convient, but they result in lack of human contact.
Although it might be easy to blame technolgy for our feelings of loneliness, it is just a cop out. By looking at all the ways technology causes isolation, it is still people who choose to use these convenient methods. If a person wants to have human contact, all they have to do is go inside to the bank or go inside the resturaunt to order. What it basically boils down to, is that it is our choice whether or not we use technology. It is a scary thought to think maybe one day we might live in a society where you will never have to leave your house. That by using FAX machines, computers, modems, and the telephone a person would never have to have human contact to get their job done. The thing is that if that is not what we as a society wants, we are the ones to speak out and change the outcome.
Comments:
This is a competent discussion of the issue. The position presented in the first paragraph -- that “there are many ways that society has used the advanced technology in order to isolate themselves” -- is adequately sustained, but the examples are not always clearly relevant (e.g., in the case of paragraph one's “computerizing” of factories, the decision to use the technology is not made by the individual worker.) Also, the reasoning is not developed as fully as it would be in a response at the score level of 6 or 5.
While organization is adequate, the response lacks the organized coherence of ideas that exemplify a 5 essay. Transitions, within and between paragraphs, are not always logical. The last paragraph could be much more clearly focused: since several sentences repeat the same idea -- that “it is our choice whether or not we use technology” -- and the purpose or meaning of others (e.g., the last) is not immediately clear.
In general, ideas are presented clearly, although awkward phrasing sometimes contributes to vagueness (e.g., “By looking at all the ways technology causes isolation, it is still people who choose to use these convenient methods”). Lack of sentence variety seems to inhibit the communication of ideas (e.g., many short sentences are often used where one or two compound ones could make the points more effectively). Overall, however, this is an adequate response to the topic.
GRE写作要列提纲吗?
作用一，稳定军心。
当你有了提纲，你起码就知道先写什么后写什么了。这样你就不会在写手中的句子时又一边在慌神下面该怎么办。对于一开始的进入状态无异于定心之剂;
作用二，层次清晰。
如果碰到了以前有过提纲的那最好了，如果没有，现场列了总归比没有的要好吧。列出了提纲，无论怎么样，都要让自己的新gre写作看起来有个系统，有个层次，有个逻辑顺序，更容易取得一个理想的gre作文成绩。
虽然听上去很有用，但有人会说自己连文章都写不完，哪来多余时间写提纲?那么如何运用提纲呢?
1、什么时候开始练习在gre考试的水平测试中加入提纲?
比较适合的是在最后10天到一周的样子。因为这首先需要在一定高强度的写作练习之后，再者，需要对题目已经有了一定的把握。很多的提纲在之前都大体列过。然后在限时中加入提纲的写作。
2、用多长时间列提纲?
ISSUE总体比ARGU短。ISSUE大体要2-3分钟，ARGU怎么都要3分钟。可能要5分钟。
3、提纲里都要包含些什么?
对ISSUE来说，读第一遍题目时把关键词提出来，接着将核心话题列出来，根据这个话题开始一条一条列出你要写的东西;ARGU来说，因为题目比较长，所以读题的时间就要比前者长。第一遍建议先把每一个意群讲的是什么简要提出来，排上序号;第二从这些小短句分析其文章结构和主要错误;第三把自己对错误的阐述顺序列出来。这样差不多是可以的了。
4、列提纲的一些技巧
需要在练习中找到自己的记录法，哪种缩写是自己看得明了的。要记出来的摘要最后自己还要辨析几分钟。建议在平时列提纲的时候就有意识的做一下限定时间练习，看2-3分钟能不能把大体的框架列出来。
GRE写作门槛如何突破
首先，题库是给定的，经过几年下来的前人总结，机考本身已经毫无悬念。高频，模板，例证，范文，大量资料充斥在互联网上并且被专业人士和机构总结印刷成册。考生们只销在考前花两三个月集中练习，得个申请的分数根本不成问题。基础好的人更是一两个月已足矣。但问题也随之而来了，大家都用着同样的参考资料不说，写作水平也都如出一辙，考官看来也就无法分辨孰好孰坏，唯有给出最安全的分数。
其次，因为倾向于去临阵磨枪，语言上虽然慢慢向规范的英文书面语靠拢，但仍缺乏时间上的沉淀而无法达到GRE写作本身的语言精练，一步到位的特点。仅仅做到了形似而神不似。因此观点写得稍好一点的同学，就可得到那0.5，如果有语言做支持，就可上到4。
最后，可以说大部分的写作还停留在临摹而不是独立作品的阶段。因为有着现成的模板和例证，在范文的引导下，模仿写作的结构和观点。所以往往造成一篇作文看起来是那么回事儿，但实际上又没有说透的感觉。对题目的意义和作文目的的把握还缺少透彻的理解。
综上几个原因，导致大部分虽然在考前付出无数汗水和努力的考生到最后没能达到这个万恶的理想4分。也针对这个问题，下面给出大家几点小小的建议，希望可以帮助到各位仍在为4而纠结的同志们：
1. 词汇。很多人在问，究竟需要不需要在写作前背完红宝书的单词。答案是不需要。红宝书的单词是针对笔试里的语文部分搜集整理的，与作文的关系不大。作文需要的高级仍然是那几个，therefore， however， admittedly。机器或者考官一见，马上会锁定，懂得写议论文，就靠它们几个。另外一些常用动词名词等实词的同义词要多背几组，英语的修辞不在华丽，在变幻。句型要多变，表达同种意思的词当然也要变幻。本来就单调的英语，重复是大忌。
2. 模板。模板怎么用，不是不用，而是要合理利用。因为这实在是一个可以让初学者一目了然，直奔主题的好东西。什么是结构，模板就是结构。模板是骨架，是支撑，但不是灵魂。灵魂的部分当然是文章的主旨，要靠自己在不懈的写作，不断的钻研中去摸索和寻找的。千万不可以依赖模板。一篇没有灵魂的骨架子是没法得高分的。
3. 练习。练习是一定要坚持得，从始至终。而且量变到质变的突破是需要时间的。
4. 临考。临考前的模考是为了让大家去把握时间，更好的进一步的查缺补漏。在考场上，更是要临危不乱，无论出现什么样的题目，相信自己，都是见过的，万变不离其宗，这当然需要练习时不断去完善自己的知识库。
GRE写作备战满分作文须知
新GRE作文高频题有用吗?肯定有用，看高频可以减低考生的工作量(也就是不需要把100多道题目都看完)，如果在GRE考试的时候遇到高频题目，而正好写过的话，那么分数就是有保证的。或者，至少比写一篇完全没有看过的文章要强。
如果我们把这些同学的看法当做一个论证的过程来找找其中的逻辑问题的话，大家就能明白为什么说“高频只是个传说了”。
在这个论证过程中，同学首先假设了一个前提，就是“写一篇已经写过的文章得到高分的可能性大于写一篇没有写过的文章”。可是，我们考虑一下，如果本身这篇文章从一开始按照这个同学的分析思路，包括写作的语言就存在巨大问题的话，那么，即使是考试的时候照着抄一遍，分数也仍然会是很低的。因此，只有当你的写作思路正确，分析过程正确，语言表达正确这几个条件都满足的时候，对于题目的熟练程度，或者是否写过某个题目的作文，才会影响到最后的分数。当然，我们还同时忽略了考场上的临场状态的变化问题。
反之，如果一个考生有正确的分析思路和写作思路，有比较好的语言表达能力，那其实考试的时候是否写过某个题目就变得不重要了，因为最终他的能力会很好地解决题目熟悉程度的问题，并且很有可能拿下GRE写作满分。比如我们所熟悉的高考语文中进行的作文测试，我们实际上是完全不知道考试会出现什么题目的，我们平时练习的时候，也基本上不会考虑考试的时候是否会遇到同样的题目，但是最终，写作能力比较好，思维方式比较正确，知识面比较宽的同学往往会在作文中得到高分。从这个角度来看，实际上在准备作文的过程中，练习的题目是否是高频并不重要，而重要的是，是否通过练习形成了正确的分析思路，写作思路，并且让语言的表达正确。
其次，很多人也认为“高频”题目在考试时被抽到的可能性更大，并且还有人会计算题目出现的概率。为了让大家都能看明白，我不会在这里建立一个模型来计算什么题目出现的概率较大，我们只考虑如下的一些问题。首先，ETS在从开放题库中抽取题目给考生的时候，是一种随机的选择方式，那么，每个题目被抽取到的概率是完全一样的。而现在并没有证据表明ETS在抽取题目的时候采用了任何优先级策略，所以我们不能对此作出主观假设。第二，从目前的高频统计方式来看，存在着很大的漏洞。据我所了解的情况，基本上是部分考生在考试结束后，在一些论坛或者BBS上发帖子，来说自己考到了什么题目，然后由一些热心的网友来进行人工统计，最后得到了所谓的“高频”题目。
大家不妨计算一下每天有多少人去参加GRE的作文考试，一年下来又有多少人参加作文考试，其中在网上发布题目的人的比例有多少，而发布出来的题目被统计的又有多少。如果这些数据本身都没有确切值的话，那么统计的样本首先就是存在问题的。而“高频”的出现，很可能是“马太效应”的结果，即在很长一段时间里面，A题目被大多数人关注，于是成为了“高频”的一部分，于是，有人考到了这个题目，在网上发了帖子，那么这个题目的关注度继续上升。而那些“低频”的题目，即使有人发了，也没人去关注，但是很可能在一段时间后，某个“低频”的题目其实出现的频率很高了，但是却依然没有人去关注它。因此，要想得到科学的统计，必须有一个平台，来随时完整统计大多数人在考试中遇到的题目的情况，并且实时更新，才能得到较为准确的数据。
因此，在备考新GRE作文的过程中，其实是否准备网络流传的“高频”题目并不重要，而重要的是，无论准备什么题目，都能有正确的思考路径和分析方法，并且能够用正确的语言来表达自己的想法。当系统化的思维方式和准确的语言表达习惯形成的时候，无论什么题目都没有问题。
此外，如果希望消除题目熟练度的影响，大量阅读题目，并且写作提纲是必要的，其中也包括对题目的分析和简单的逻辑结构梳理。
GRE写作：列提纲的注意事项
第一，稳定军心。
第二，层次清晰。
如果碰到了以前有过提纲的那最好了，如果没有，现场列了总归比没有的要好吧。列出了提纲，无论怎么样，都要让文章看起来有个系统，有个层次，有个逻辑顺序。主要的作用就是以上两点。所以我以为给作文列提纲是非常必要和值得的。所谓的四两拔千金，可以很好的解释这个原理。
再讨论到如何实践的问题。有人会说自己连文章都写不完，哪来多余的写提纲?
1、什么时候开始练习在模考时加入提纲?
比较适合的是在最后10天到一周的样子。因为这首先需要在一定高强度的写作练习之后，再者，需要对题目已经有了一定的把握。很多的提纲在之前都大体列过。然后在限时中加入提纲的写作。
2、用多长时间列提纲?
我的经验是ISSUE总体比ARGU短。ISSUE大体要2-3分钟，ARGU怎么都要3分钟。可能要5分钟。
3、提纲里都要包含些什么?
对ISSUE来说，读第一遍题目时把关键词提出来，接着将核心话题列出来，根据这个话题开始一条一条列出你要写的东西;ARGU来说，因为题目比较长，所以读题的时间就要比前者长。
第一遍建议先把每一个意群讲的是什么简要提出来，排上序号;第二从这些小短句分析其文章结构和主要错误;第三把自己对错误的阐述顺序列出来。这样差不多是可以的了。
4、列提纲的一些技巧
需要在练习中找到自己的记录法，哪种缩写是自己看得明了的。要记出来的摘要最后自己还要辨析几分钟。建议在平时列提纲的时候就有意识的做一下限定时间练习，看2-3分钟能不能把大体的框架列出来。
其他：我觉得如果正确掌握提纲的写法和时间分配问题，将是对于AW的核心实力的一种提高。对比于其他人，无论如何都是要略胜一筹的。
GRE写作满分范文赏析
“Our declining environment may bring the people of the world together as no politician, philosopher, or war ever could. Environmental problems are global in scope and respect no nation's boundaries. Therefore, people are faced with the choice of unity and cooperation on the one hand or disunity and a common tragedy on the other.”
At no other time then in our present time has the need for unity and togetherness been more necessary to the inhabitants on our planet. For many decades the motto has been one of waste and denial. The world is in a race - racing to become number one - racing to destroy the earth. Traditions of protecting the earth have been abandoned as the need to satisfy infantile needs and desires wins out over the more philosophical desires of thought and meaning. Unfortunately many do not see the need for reforms in actions and thought; people are living for today and not tomorrow. Those that can believe in a future, and exhibit a desire to make a difference in this future must find a way to influence the remaining masses, and often it seems that the world simply refused to listen or learn from its past mistakes.
Those that answer this calling will not do so for notiority, but instead for their beliefs that they can make a difference. They will need to be of strong heart, body, soul, and beliefs. Understanding the need for an overhaul in our system in the rampant abuses is the first step to obtaining advancement in the struggle to bring the world together in a way that will benefit mankind today and tomorrow.
For too many years American's have persuaded themselves that the envirnoment was in no danger. Every year laws have been passed to protect our land, animals, and even our people. More often than not there are loopholes in these laws, allowing the environment to remain in peril. It seems that we often forget that we are not the only ones on earth. We are only a small percentage, and much too often our actions have a great effect on those that must subsist on this earth as well. One threatening example of this is the depletion of the rain forests in the Central and South Americas. It seems difficult for Americans to understand how these people can destroy their natural landscapes. Not only is the landscaped destroyed and the invaluable plants and animal life are also destroyed, and these can never be recovered. Americans express their annoyance at such practices, failing to see that we as consumers are one of the main causes of such actions. As a consumer society we depend on wood and other materials from these areas. Unfortunately these areas are nothing like what we see at home, instead it is a world of unimaginable poverty and harshness. In these areas where poverty is so prevalent often the only means of survival is found through the clearing of the precious rain forest for farm land. Certainly the fact that these people are farming in order to maintain their survival is important and can not be over looked. Yet, in most cases the farming is not done as a means of raising food and livestock for their own uses. This land is usually used to grow food for other countries such as America. This scenario depicts the wickedness that has become of our world. The first world nations are destroying the second and third world nations in order to fuel our excessive desires.
The world must find a way to come together so that there will be a tomorrow for everyone. New legislation must be passed that protects not only the environment of America, but the environments of other countries. Big business must also realize that they can no longer use dirty legislation and kickbacks to continue to pollute the earth.
Another important aspect that people must learn is that if we cannot learn to recycle and reduce waste, one day we will run out of dumping ground. It is frightening to think that this is what it will to take to make most people realize that actions must be taken to clean up our earth. It seems that we will only be able to come together when there is not other alternative. Perhaps the must unfathomable thought is, what happens if people do not unite together now to protect our environment. It can only seem that we will once again be threatened with war as we fight each other to death over the last precious miles of land and food. Civilization will have come full circle; all of our technological and scientific advances will mean nothing if the earth is destroyed and mankind subsequently wiped out with it
Comments:
This is a generally well-developed response in which the writer examines the complexities of the issue and explains ideas clearly through good control of the elements of effective writing.
The writer strongly agrees with the topic's claim and uses the first paragraph to expand on the idea that environmental problems imperil the earth. These problems, according to the writer, derive from people's lack of maturity (“infantile needs and desires”) and lack of foresight (“people are living for today and not tomorrow.”)
The third paragraph provides a highly relevant example of the complexities involved in the issue, showing how damage to the rainforest can be attributed both to poverty in Latin America and to the voracious appetite of the wealthy North American “consumer society.” From here the writer returns to the focus on planning for “tomorrow” and proposes a specific remedy (“New legislation must be passed?”) The discussion closes with a passionate description of a negative scenario for the future.
The response is well organized but, unlike a 6 paper, does not sustain a tight focus. Although the example of the rain forest degradation is highly relevant and fully developed, many of the reasons and assertions receive only cursory development or explanation (“new legislation must be passed? It can only seem that we will once again be threatened with war?”).
The sentence structure in the essay is often nicely varied but at other times is choppy (“This land is?” “This scenario depicts?” “The first world nations?”) Thus, the connection between ideas is also choppy at times.
The vocabulary is generally well chosen, with words such as “depletion,” “unfathomable,” and “subsequently.” However, the phrasing is at times imprecise, as in these examples: “We are only a small percentage,” and “At no other time then in our present time has the need??? been more necessary?” Although these problems keep the paper out of the 6 category, it is nevertheless a strong response to the topic.
GRE写作满分范文赏析
“Our declining environment may bring the people of the world together as no politician, philosopher, or war ever could. Environmental problems are global in scope and respect no nation's boundaries. Therefore, people are faced with the choice of unity and cooperation on the one hand or disunity and a common tragedy on the other.”
Cooperation---or Tragedy?
The solution to the world's growing environmental problems may have to wait awhile. It has been said that “environmental problems are global and respect no nation's boundaries.” Unfortunately, pollution and its consequences still fall to large measure on those least likely to do anything about it: poor countries willing to sacrifice anything in order to sit at the table with the world's wealthy.
As far as the industrialized nations of the world are concerned, the world is a big place. Environmental destruction taking place outside their borders may sometimes be fodder for government pronouncements of concern, but few concrete actions. Deforestation of the Amazon, for instance, is of vital concern to all those who wish to continue breathing. But the only effective deterrent to this activity, the restriction of international aid money to those countries showing net deforestation, has been stalled in the United Nations by those unwilling to “interfere” in the internal politics of other nations.
Because of the differential impact of polluting activities around the world, and even in different regions of a single country, many governments will undoubtedly continue to promulgate only modest environmental regulations. Costs to polluting companies will continue to carry as much weight as the benefit of a pollution-free environment. Particularly in the current political climate of the United States, the well-documented expense of today's pollution-control measures will be stacked against the unknown long-term effects of polluting actitivities. “Why should I spend millions of dollars a year, which causes me to have to raise the cost of my goods or eliminate jobs, if no one really knows if air pollution is all that harmful? Show me the proof, ” an air polluting company may demand.
Realistically, it won't be until critical mass is achieved that the hoped for “choice of unity and cooperation” will be a viable one. Only when the earth as a whole is so polluted that life itself becomes increasingly difficult for a majority of the world's people will there likely be the political will to force global environmental laws on governments worldwide. But the optimists (read: environmental activists) among us continue to believe that the world can be shown the error of its ways. They continue to point out that the sky is probably falling--or at least developing a big hole. The world, as a whole, ignores them.
One would hope, however, that governments, perhaps through a strengthened U.N., could somehow be forced to realize that when the Earth reaches the critical mass of pollution, it may be too late to do anything about it. That would be a “common tragedy” indeed.
Comments:
This excellent response displays an in-depth analysis of the issue, conveyed through the skillful use of language.
While acknowledging that environmental problems are serious and of global dimensions, the discussion explores the complexity of international cooperation. Such cooperation, the paper argues, runs into a variety of problems, and the writer offers persuasive examples to support that point:
-- the unwillingness of nations to “interfere” with other nations through
political measures such as restriction of foreign aid
-- inadequate environmental regulations, which are caused both by “the
differential impact of polluting activities” between countries and
regions and by the difficulty of comparing the “long-term effects of
polluting actitivities” with the more easily documented, short-term
costs of reducing pollution.
The paper distinguishes itself in part by its excellent organization. The first paragraph analyzes the claim and announces the writer's position; the second and third paragraphs provide clear examples supporting that position. The skillful use of a quotation from a business person vividly illustrates the economic impact of pollution controls. The last two paragraphs bring a sense of closure to the essay by continuing the theme announced in the first paragraph -- that cooperation must wait until more dire circumstances produce the political will necessary to reduce pollution.
Transitional phrases -- “because,” “however,” “for instance” -- help guide the reader through the argument. Also, effective sentence variety and the use of precise vocabulary help clarify meaning and confirm the score of 6.
gre写作考试如何临场列提纲?
在考生的gre写作练习中，gre写作列提纲是一件非常重要的事情：
作用一，稳定军心。
当你有了提纲，你起码就知道先写什么后写什么了。这样你就不会在写手中的句子时又一边在慌神下面该怎么办。对于一开始的进入状态无异于定心之剂;
作用二，层次清晰。
如果碰到了以前有过提纲的那最好了，如果没有，现场列了总归比没有的要好吧。列出了提纲，无论怎么样，都要让自己的新gre写作看起来有个系统，有个层次，有个逻辑顺序，更容易取得一个理想的gre作文成绩。
虽然听上去很有用，但有人会说自己连文章都写不完，哪来多余时间写提纲?那么如何运用提纲呢?
1、什么时候开始练习在gre写作考试的水平测试中加入提纲?
比较适合的是在最后10天到一周的样子。因为这首先需要在一定高强度的写作练习之后，再者，需要对题目已经有了一定的把握。很多的提纲在之前都大体列过。然后在限时中加入提纲的写作。
2、用多长时间列提纲?
ISSUE总体比ARGU短。ISSUE大体要2-3分钟，ARGU怎么都要3分钟。可能要5分钟。
3、提纲里都要包含些什么?
对ISSUE来说，读第一遍题目时把关键词提出来，接着将核心话题列出来，根据这个话题开始一条一条列出你要写的东西;ARGU来说，因为题目比较长，所以读题的时间就要比前者长。第一遍建议先把每一个意群讲的是什么简要提出来，排上序号;第二从这些小短句分析其文章结构和主要错误;第三把自己对错误的阐述顺序列出来。这样差不多是可以的了。
4、列提纲的一些技巧
需要在练习中找到自己的记录法，哪种缩写是自己看得明了的。要记出来的摘要最后自己还要辨析几分钟。gre备考攻略建议在平时列提纲的时候就有意识的做一下限定时间练习，看2-3分钟能不能把大体的框架列出来。
新GRE填空单空双选题的答题技巧
现在新GRE填空出现了一种新的题型：句子等值题，也叫单空双选题。就是说只有一个空格，要求从提供的六个选项中选出两个正确答案(只选出一个正确答案者不得分)。而且要做到两个答案各自所构成的句子是等值的，即意义相同。这种题目的出现，无疑增加了GRE句子填空题目的难度，怎么做这类的题呢?
首先，考生可以根据句子填空的单空题的做题方法(即根据句子本身的语义与逻辑)确定第一个答案。然后，根据句子的语境，找一个语义上与第一个答案近似的词。这样我们就可以确定所要求的两个答案。例如，
Although it does contain some pioneering ideas, one would hardly characterize the work as BLANK。
A. orthodox
B. eccentric
C. original
D. trifling
E. conventional
F. innovative
although说明主句与从句部分构成转折关系。同时，由于主句中的hardly表示否定，那么可以确定空格中要填的词与从句中的 pioneering(创新的)为同义词，F. innovative(创新的)符合要求，为第一个答案。C. original(原创的)为innovative在此语境中的同义词，因此是第二个答案。
新GRE句子填空等值题是子等值题可以视为两类题的迭加：旧GRE填空中的单空题和语境中的同义词选择。所以要想在新GRE句子等值题里选择出正确的答案就要根据句子本身的语义与逻辑。
综上诉述，GRE句子等值题可看做是两类题的迭加，即目前的GRE句子填空中的单空题加上语境中的同义词选择。同时在答题难度和技巧上，也是这两类题目的叠加，所以这类GRE填空需要更加认真的分析。
新GRE句子填空词汇讲解：replicate
经常出现在新GRE填空中的一些GRE词汇不知道考生们有没有注意过，这些词汇是新GRE考试的重点词汇，意义和用法都需要认真的进行理解。下面就为大家进行新GRE填空词汇讲解，帮助大家巩固经常被考到的新GRE填空词汇，帮助大家考试的时候顺利完成题目。
新GRE填空词汇：replicate
replicate[英][ˈreplɪˌkeɪt] [美][ˈrɛplɪˌket]
简明释义
vt.复制，复写;重复，反复;折转;[生] 复制 考试用书
adj.复制的;折叠的;[植]折转的
n.复制品;八音阶间隔的反覆音
复数：replicates第三人称单数：replicates过去式：replicated过去分词：replicated现在分词：replicating
replication
The process of replication is very quick and efficient.
复制的过程快捷、高效。
例句
Then they replicate and move to the salivary glands.
然后，他们复制并移动到唾液腺。
Virus replicate outside the cells.
病毒在细胞外复制。
Replicate the directory structure of remote servers.
复制远端服务器的目录结构。
Where exactly does the virus replicate?
病毒到底在那里复制?
I couldn’t replicate your problem.
我不能复制你自己的问题。
?我的经验是ISSUE总体比ARGU短。GRE分数ISSUE大体要2-3分钟，ARGU怎么都要3分钟。可能要5分钟。
GRE写作提纲要包含这些要素
对ISSUE来说，读第一遍题目时把关键词提出来，GRE考试接着将核心话题列出来，根据这个话题开始一条一条列出你要写的东西;ARGU来说，因为题目比较长，所以读题的时间就要比前者长。第一遍建议先把每一个意群讲的是什么简要提出来，排上序号;第二从这些小短句分析其文章结构和主要错误;第三把自己对错误的阐述顺序列出来。这样差不多是可以的了。
GRE写作列提纲技巧介绍
需要在练习中找到自己的记录法，哪种缩写是自己看得明了的。不要记出来的摘要最后自己还要辨析几分钟。GRE写作满分建议在平时列提纲的时候就有意识的做一下限定时间练习，看2-3分钟能不能把大体的框架列出来。
其它列提纲的心得讲解
我觉得如果正确掌握提纲的写法和时间分配问题，将是对于AW的核心实力的一种提高。对比于其他人，无论如何都是要略胜一筹的。鼓励大家去积极尝试，发掘自己最适合的一套方法。我主要就是站出来告诉大家，在30分钟内分别写两个提纲ISSUE和ARGU还剩平均3分钟时间检查，是绝对可以实现的。因为我自己就是例子。
上述就是我们分享的GRE考试作文的注意事项，作文部分是我们拿到GRE分数必须要掌握的部分。所以希望考生们复习考试的时候多参考一下GRE写作满分同学的经验，希望上述的列提纲的技巧能帮助到大家的复习。
GRE写作Issue题目分析与提纲
第二类 行为类
12. “People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by any internal characteristic.”
人们的态度更多的是由临时的情况或者环境所决定，而非人们自身的特点。
Social environment does plays a more important role in forming a person’s attitudes.
1. Admittedly, people’s inborn temperament does play an important role in their attitudes.
2. However, more often than not, people’s attitudes are largely influenced by their immediate situation or surroundings.
3. It should also be noted that external factors not only influence people’s attitudes, but also shape their characters.
------------------------------
18. “Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.”
只有通过排除异议和对照其他的观点来捍卫一个理念，人们才能真正的发现该理念的价值所在。
Agree
1. Different viewpoints interconnect with each other. Only after careful comparison can we reach the soul of the idea.
2. Doubts and contrasting views can provide valuable use for reverences to our learning.
3. History is replete with illustrative cases in which doubts and contrasting views contribute to the consummation of our knowledge.
------------------------------
21. “Reform is seldom brought about by people who are concerned with their own reputation and social standing. Those who are really in earnest about reforming a government, an educational system, or any other institution must be willing to be viewed with disdain by the rest of the world.”
改革几乎从来都不是由那些关心自己声誉和社会地位的人发起的。那些真正热衷于政府改革、教育改革和其他机构改革的人们一定都是甘于被他人轻视的。
1. Reform means the redistribution of benefits of various levels; therefore, resist and dissatisfaction is inevitable.
2. Those who are not really in earnest about reform will retreat when facing difficulties in a reform.
------------------------------
25. “Anyone can make things bigger and more complex. What requires real effort and courage is to move in the opposite direction--in other words, to make things as simple as possible.”
任何人都可以把事情简单复杂化，但是需要真正努力和勇气的恰恰相反，也就是说应该把事情变得尽可能的简单。
1. The statement brings immediately to mind the ever-growing and increasingly complex digital world.
2. Lending even more credence to the statement is the so-called “big government” phenomenon.
3. Adding further credibility to the statement is the tendency of most people to complicate their personal lives.
复杂和简单
------------------------------
27. “No one can possibly achieve success in the world by conforming to conventional practices and conventional ways of thinking.”
这个世界上没有人能够靠墨守陈规(行动或者思维上的)而获得成功。
1. Traditional ways of thinking are treasures which will prevent us from wasting time and energy on trial things.
2. However, we can create nothing if we are only confined to the conventional experience.
新手和老手之墨守成规和成功
------------------------------
31. “Money spent on research is almost always a good investment, even when the results of that research are controversial.”
花在研究上的资金基本上都是不错的投资，即使研究的结果是有争议的。
Disagree with concession:
1. I concede that the speaker is on the correct philosophical side of this issue. After all, research is the exploration of the unknown for answers to our questions, and for lasting solutions to our endure problems.
2. While we must invest in research irrespective of whether the results might be controversial, at the same time we should be circumspect about research whose objectives are too vague and whose potential benefits are too speculative.
3. No amount of research can completely solve the enduring problems of war, poverty and violence, for the reason that they stem from the certain aspects of human nature—such as aggression and greed.
写作Issue题目分析与提纲
compromise one's beliefs than to adhere to them.“
无论在什么样的情况下，折衷自己的信仰要比坚持有害。
1. Having a belief is a good thing for an individual in a certain degree in the form of spiritual support. However, if the belief goes too extreme and even influences people’s life and family negatively, it is best to reconsider whether the belief worth so much persistence.
2. Choosing to compromise does not mean that we have to give up our original belief. On the contrary, we are finding a better way to perfect our belief.
信仰
------------------------------
37. ”In most societies, competition generally has more of a negative than a positive effect.“
在大多数社会中，竞争一般是弊多利少。
Disagree
1. Competition benefits the general public by providing people with cheaper products and better service.
2. Competition spurs innovation and invention, bringing new products and technology to multitudes.
3. Admittedly, we should notice the side effect of competition, which are shrinking profit, dishonesty, etc.
利多弊少之竞争
------------------------------
62. ”The widespread idea that people should make self-improvement a primary goal in their lives is problematic because it assumes that people are intrinsically deficient.“
认为人们应该把自我进步当做是人生头等大事的流行观点是有问题的，因为这样的观点在假设人们是天生就有缺陷的。
Disagree
1. On the one hand, admitting that we are deficient is the first step towards progress.
2. On the other hand, smugness only leads to stagnancy.
3. A serious problem with modern society is that too many people fail to realize the need for self-improvement.
独立题目
------------------------------
64. ”Many people know how to attain success, but few know how to make the best use of it.“
很多人懂得如何去获得成功，但是很少有人知道如何最好的去利用成功。
1. A common characteristic of contemporary society is that people everywhere are concerned about how to attain success.
2. Success is commonly understood as material gains.
3. However, success does not ensure happiness.
4. “Successful” people often ignore the interests and needs of other people, which renders their “success” meaningless.
Attain and sustain打江山容易，保江山难
------------------------------
68. ”People make the mistake of treating experts with suspicion and mistrust, no matter how valuable their contributions might be.“
人们经常错误的猜疑和不信任专家，无论专家们的贡献是多么的有价值。
Expert’s opinions should be evaluated objectively.
1. Generally speaking, experts’ opinions are comparatively more trustworthy than ordinary people’s when it comes to solving problems that require special expertise.
2. The reality of our society is that people tend to take for granted whatever experts say.
3. It is possible that sometimes experts do make mistakes which ordinary people can correct.
怀疑权威
------------------------------
71. ”Spending time alone makes one a better companion to others.“
学会独自消磨时光会使你更好地成为别人的伙伴。
Agree
1. Admittedly, habitually isolating oneself from others does not automatically make one a better companion.
2. However, people who think and work independently will be able to bring new ideas and new perspectives to others.
3. One’s loneliness makes one crave for and cherish the opportunity to stay with others.
人际关系之个人时间和公众时间
------------------------------
74. ”The most effective way to communicate an idea or value to large groups of people is through the use of images, not language."
和一大群人交流想法或者价值观的最有效方式是图像而非语言。
The use of images is not always more effective than that of language.
1. On the one hand, images are more vivid and easier for the largest audience to comprehend.
2. On the other hand, images tend to cause ambiguities.
3. The most effective way of communication is combing the use of images and that of language.
★ 英语论文提纲写作
