以下是小编帮大家整理的GRE阅读主要扣分原因逐条分析（共含8篇），欢迎大家收藏分享。同时，但愿您也能像本文投稿人“月鸣”一样，积极向本站投稿分享好文章。
对于激进的( 进化论)左的(马列)上纲上线的，通常不与支持，对于以政治干涉学术，尤其反对。
对于歧视弱者，损害弱者尤其反对，弱者恒强。
Should, must, should have 等词也是负评价，应然不然。
选项中极端的，进行人身攻击的，模棱两可的，谄媚的，马上排除，因为这是学术考试。
选项过分极端的副词，也要小心，如表示绝对的言辞。
GRE阅读
GRE阅读主要扣分原因逐条分析
1. 没有养成阅读中做定位标记的习惯
GRE阅读文章篇幅不一，大致可分为短篇文章和长篇文章，其中大部分阅读包括逻辑阅读的文章都是短篇，一次GRE考试中长篇文章的数量一般只有1篇。但恰恰是这1篇的长篇阅读，才是最让考生头痛的内容。这是因为长篇文章往往涉及到一些比较专业晦涩的科技类社会类内容，文章中存在大量长难句式和冷僻生词，本身具备一定难度，通篇阅读往往需要大量时间。同时文章中往往会涉及到许多细节内容，题目中也会有涉及到这些细节的部分，定位就成为了大问题。想要看的细节找不到在哪里，只能重读一遍，大大浪费了考试时间。
应对长篇文章，最好的办法还是快速阅读+做笔记的方法。长篇文章不需要全部完整地详细阅读，在快速阅读过程中，大家应该以理解文章整体大意和各段落的重心思想为主。对于各类细节内容，只要在笔记上进行标记，知道其所处位置即可。等到解答相应的细节题时，再根据标记快速返回，就能准确定位到具体内容，提升解题效率。
2. 文章中细节数字干扰阅读理解
在GRE阅读题中，为了证明作者观点，文章中常会使用到一些具体的数字，有些数字十分复杂，涉及许多具体内容。而这些数字加入出现在题目当中，就会提升题目难度，特别是在一些Support或者Infer题目中，选项中的数字可以说是扣分的主要原因。
想要应对好复杂数字问题，考生首先需要培养阅读过程中对于数字的敏感性。只要在文章中看到，建议大家都第一时间做好标记，以便之后返回查找。同时，如果在题目选项中看到出现了数字问题，首先要区分是否是有关内容。很多选项提到了一堆数字，本身却和题目毫无关系，只是干扰项，大家一定要学会分辨并及时排除。同时，面对数字题时如果实在没有头绪，可以通过排除法来解题，重点还是在理解题目本身。
3. 做题速度太慢影响考试整体时间
细节题是套路题型，但有时候也会出现变化。很多考生解答细节题时，往往会按照返回原文查找，然后根据原文内容进行解题。但很多时候，原文中会出现许多其实并没有作用的干扰性细节，大家不能简单地按照原文提到就是对，没提到就是错的思路来解题。正确做法是先看懂题目，然后把涉及到的细节进行分类排除，只保留真正有关的细节，如此一来就能顺利应对好细节题中的那些隐藏陷阱和扣分点。
GRE阅读备考的重要步骤
1. 解剖文章的第1段
积极主动地解读文章的第1段，阅读时尽量记住作者提出的问题(现象或观点)，和一些关于文章内容的概念和词汇，如这篇文章讲的是生物化学，日本企业文化还是黑人运动。文章的论题是什么，作者想说什么?
2. 在脑子里面形成一个作者思路图
在脑子里或者在草稿纸上画一个文章的结构思路题。各个段落的目的是什么，主题又是什么?再次提醒，考察的是你的答题能力而非阅读能力。你不必完全掌握整篇文章，了解文章中的每一个细节。(其实，你也没有那么多时间)。相反，你应该只读文章段落的第1句，而快速浏览其余部分。当你“读”完这篇文章时，你就能对文章的结构思路有总体的把握。
3. 通览文章时，留意语气词和过渡词
在快速阅读文章时，特别留意段落开头或者结尾可能出现的语气词和过渡词。这样做有助于你对作者思路的把握，从而快速掌握文章大意。
4. 停下来，总结一下文章大意
在回答问题前，花几秒钟总结一下文章的思路和主题。
5. 开始答题
根据你对文章的整体思路来答题。将问题(或选项)定位到文章中具体的某个段落甚至具体的句子。这里，你可以比第3个步骤更仔细。
GRE阅读命题规律的介绍
更为深入的把握，俗话说“知己知彼百战不殆”我想在新gre逻辑阅读文章上取得好的成绩就要先把握其命题规则。
GRE阅读考试出题规律解析。对于这个GRE阅读考试来说，学术化就是最大的纲，也是它迥异于托福雅思的纲，我曾在另文中指出，雅思托福的命题目的是生活化，而对于GRE阅读考试来说，学术化代表着措辞的规范和温和。对于考生的意义在于，文章的整体是温和的，文章里面出现的极端的言辞都是要注意的，文章里面的事实都是与我们学术生活共时的，对于过去的追忆和反现实的虚拟状态，都是非常明显的潜在出题点。
尤其是虚拟语气，往往表示应然而非然之状态，很有可能出现负评价，以态度题的方式考察。而一切过分极端的言辞，如绝对的说法，大多数，比较级尤其是强烈比较级，在文章里的出现要注意，还有一种也是强烈的对比的标志，就是以大写字母标注的时间，指明某时之前或之后，我们称之为时间强对比。
以上总结之，即是三大关系，强对比，因果以及转折。表示这些关系的连词，一律要注意，最好做出标记。而对于题目来说，考生要注意以上说法是在哪里出现，如果文章有这些强烈的措辞，那么题目当中对应这些段落的选项也有，就很可能是对的，如果选项出现而文章的相应位置没有，则该选项必错。
参加GRE考试要牢记阅读中的潜规则：对于态度的预见
主题，态度题如何解决呢?首先我们需要了解GRE阅读的评价体系。
GRE阅读提分难度高别埋头做题 从发现扣分原因开始提升
GRE阅读哪些原因容易导致扣分?
首先，考生需要明确的是GRE阅读的主要扣分原因有哪些。许多同学阅读出错只会根据错题本身进行分析，却忽视了从更高层面去分析错误的类型和具体原因。下面小编就为大家介绍3个最常见的GRE阅读扣分原因。
1. 定位技巧未掌握
GRE阅读文章篇幅不一，大致可分为短篇文章和长篇文章，其中大部分阅读包括逻辑阅读的文章都是短篇，一次GRE考试中长篇文章的数量一般只有1篇。但恰恰是这1篇的长篇阅读，才是最让考生头痛的内容。这是因为长篇文章往往涉及到一些比较专业晦涩的科技类社会类内容，文章中存在大量长难句式和冷僻生词，本身具备一定难度，通篇阅读往往需要大量时间。同时文章中往往会涉及到许多细节内容，题目中也会有涉及到这些细节的部分，定位就成为了大问题。想要看的细节找不到在哪里，只能重读一遍，大大浪费了考试时间。
应对长篇文章，最好的办法还是快速阅读+做笔记的方法。长篇文章不需要全部完整地详细阅读，在快速阅读过程中，大家应该以理解文章整体大意和各段落的重心思想为主。对于各类细节内容，只要在笔记上进行标记，知道其所处位置即可。等到解答相应的细节题时，再根据标记快速返回，就能准确定位到具体内容，提升解题效率。
2. 被文章细节带偏注意力
在GRE阅读题中，为了证明作者观点，文章中常会使用到一些具体的数字，有些数字十分复杂，涉及许多具体内容。而这些数字加入出现在题目当中，就会提升题目难度，特别是在一些Support或者Infer题目中，选项中的数字可以说是扣分的主要原因。
想要应对好复杂数字问题，考生首先需要培养阅读过程中对于数字的敏感性。只要在文章中看到，建议大家都第一时间做好标记，以便之后返回查找。同时，如果在题目选项中看到出现了数字问题，首先要区分是否是有关内容。很多选项提到了一堆数字，本身却和题目毫无关系，只是干扰项，大家一定要学会分辨并及时排除。同时，面对数字题时如果实在没有头绪，可以通过排除法来解题，重点还是在理解题目本身。
3. 解题效率低时间不够用
细节题是套路题型，但有时候也会出现变化。很多考生解答细节题时，往往会按照返回原文查找，然后根据原文内容进行解题。但很多时候，原文中会出现许多其实并没有作用的干扰性细节，大家不能简单地按照原文提到就是对，没提到就是错的思路来解题。正确做法是先看懂题目，然后把涉及到的细节进行分类排除，只保留真正有关的细节，如此一来就能顺利应对好细节题中的那些隐藏陷阱和扣分点。
GRE阅读：省略结构解析
在英语的行文中，大家常常被其中的词的省略造成的麻烦所困扰。其实这种困扰主要出自我们对其英文行文表达习惯和修辞手法的不了解。一般说来，英语文中的省略需遵守两个原则：一是这个词可有可无，或者是多余的，总之就是少了它之后不会改变原文的意思，二是省略的词义已经在上下文中得到了充分的体现。这里举个简单的例子让大家，先吃个开胃餐：
Someone traveling alone, if hungry, injured, or ill, often had nowhere to turn except to the nearest cabin or settlement.这句话的中文意思是独自旅行的人，要是饿了、受伤了或者生病了，除了最近的小木屋或居民点，常常无处求援。这个句子在if后面省略了he is，这是因为在时间，地点，条件，让步，方式状语从句中，如果从句的主语与主句的主语相同(或为it)，而从句的谓语又含有be(包括联系动词be和助动词be)，则可把“主语+be”省略掉。但要注意有一类句子和省略句有相似的地方,如:You must get out of the city, and that quickly.(你得出城,而且得快.)这样的句子并不是省略句,因为后一句中有that代表了要表示的意思。
He believes, although perhaps he does not know he believe it, that the more extensive verifications are, that the more frequently experiments have been made and results of the same kind arrived at, that the more varied the conditions under which the same results have been attained, the more certain is the ultimate conclusion, and he disputes the question no further.
句子解析：在这句子由and连接的两部分构成，第一部分中although引导的其让步作用的状语从句将believes与其宾语部分分割开来，believe后面的宾语部分包括三个that引导的从句，和后面and前的部分，需要注意的是这里用了the more…the more…的结构，其中第二个the more子句中，arrived at省略了have been，而第三个the more子句中包含了一个由which引导的定语从句。
GRE阅读：省略结构解析
句子翻译：他相信，尽管他或许不知道自己相信，验证范围越广泛，试验做得越多且得出的结果相同，而且得出同一结果的条件越是多样化，则最终的结论就越肯定无疑，他再也不对这个问题提出质疑了。
What is questioned is whether a country like Britain has a chance, assuming it has the will, to succeed where so many have failed, and even assuming that it has, should make the tremendous effort and take substantial financial risk of trying to leap-fr. into leadership in entirely new technol.y, or whether it should take the softer option of merely catching up with the rest of the industrialized world.
句子解析：这是一个主系表结构。What is questioned是主语从句。表语是两个以whether引导的从句。第一个whether从句的主干结构是a country has a chance to succeed and should make the tremendous effort and take substantial financial risk of trying to leap-fr. into leadership in entirely new technol.y，而两个assuming引导的从句用来表示假设，此外where引导的状语从句是为了做一对比，并且在第二个assuming从句的it has后面省略了the chance;第二个whether从句结构比较简单不再仔细讨论。
句子翻译：现在提出的问题是，像英国这样的国家，假如愿意的话，是否有可能在很多国家已经失败的方面获得成功。假如有这种可能，英国是否应尽最大的努力，冒最大的财政风险，一步进入全新技术的前列，或者应该采取比较稳妥地选择，只是赶上其他工业国的步伐。
详解GRE阅读3大类常见扣分原因
GRE阅读提分技巧：从结构入手看懂全文
对于考生来说，GRE阅读最令人欣慰的一点，也许就是其文章结构的规范性和公式化。几乎所有的GRE阅读文章都是同一个模子里出来的：第一段探讨一个高深的话题，第二段质疑一个关于此话题来自其他人的观点或看法，最后一段作者再给出自己的意见和结论。而最让考生头疼的一点，则是话题本身的无趣性。无论如何，考生在阅读中，需要做到主动去了解熟悉文章结构，通过多阅读掌握GRE文章的常见结构套路，而不是被动的等着看文章然后见招拆招。
GRE阅读提分技巧：看懂文章再开始做题
关于做阅读，一直以来有这么一种说法，那就是先读题目再看文章，看似能节省很多时间，其实却是最愚蠢不过的做法。带着一肚子问题看文章，先不谈能记住多少问题，首先脑子里就已经塞进了一堆东西，这种状态下的阅读只会降低效率，最后文章没看懂，题目全忘了，白费一番功夫。正确的做法是先读完全文。仔细看完整篇文章并在此基础上进行解题，而不要囫囵吞枣的快速看过，其实什么都没记住。
GRE阅读提分技巧：主动思考边读边想
上面说了不要先看题目，为什么这里又要说带着问题看文章呢?这里的问题，其实是指的一些常见的容易出题点，再看文章的过程中，主动去寻找这些常见问题点，适当做一些标记帮助定位，将有助于快速解题。下面是这些需要在阅读过程中寻找的问题点：
1. 文章讨论的是什么?
2. 就讨论的内容，作者给出了几个解释或理论，分别是什么?作者对于这些解释/理论的态度是什么?
3. 为什么作者觉得自己提出的理论最好?
4. 文章的主题是什么?
GRE阅读常见扣分原因：在细节部分浪费过多精力
很多GRE阅读文章，都会包含大量的各种细节，有数据、有描述、有具体说明等。对于这些细节，在不影响阅读的情况下，建议大家不要过度深入，看过即可。很多细节其实都是无关紧要的干扰内容，完全不会出现在之后的题目中，考生要做到的是把握整体。不少同学会因为纠结于细节而反反复复的阅读同一段内容，浪费大量时间，殊为不智。
GRE阅读常见扣分原因：缺乏对文章话题的阅读兴趣
GRE文章的内容，对于考生来说，有时候的确会显得颇为无趣，尤其是一些比较冷门的科技内容，平时即使放在眼前估计也不会去看。带着消极、不想看的态度去解题，当然不会有太好的结果。所以，建议大家在阅读时，尽量把文章内容都想象成自己最想看，最感兴趣的内容，哪怕是自欺欺人，也尽可能的把这些文章当成自己喜欢看的内容，用积极的态度去看文章。
GRE阅读常见扣分原因：受到选项干扰影响
看完文章，看题目，然后看选项，应该是很多人做题的方法。但GRE阅读的出题者，在这里又为考生设置了陷阱。一道题五个选项，除了正确选项外，其他选项往往都写得似是而非，迷惑性极高，如果考生想要靠脑海中对文章的记忆来一一排除这些选项，往往会反受其扰，混淆了自己原本还算清晰的思路。最好的做法是看完题目后，先不急着看选项，而是根据自己之前对文章的理解，回到文章中找到相关的内容，并总结出自己对于问题的答案，然后带着这个答案，再到选项中去寻找比较匹配的结果。这么做，就能较好的避免被错误选项干扰。
GRE阅读：长难句分析
As my own studies have advanced，I have been increasingly impressed with the functional similarities between insect and vertebrate societies and less so with the structural differences that seem，at first glance，to constitute such an immense gulf between them. (5)
随着我的研究不断深入，我对昆虫和脊椎动物群落之间的功能类似性印象愈来愈深刻，而对结构上的差异印象愈发淡漠，虽然这些结构上的差异初看上去似乎构成了二者间一条无法愈越的鸿沟。
难句类型：复杂修饰、插入语、省略
解释：本句子的中间一段impressed with the functional similarites between insect and vertebrate societies and less so with the structural differences容易令人看晕，其中的insect and vertebrate societies and less so with由两个and连接了三个部分，然而它们其实不是同一层次的并列，第一个and实际上是between insect societies and vertebrate societies的一部分，是并列的，而and之后的less so with其实是对于一个完整的表达方式I have been increasingly less impressed with的省略形式，去掉了与前面重复的成分。
后面修饰的structural differences的定语从句that seem, at first glance, to constitute such an immense gulf between them中，又出现了一个别扭的插入语at first glance，把应该连在一起的seem to 粗暴地分开，令人不熟悉此类难句的人倍感不适。
GRE阅读：长难句分析
Although fiction assuredly springs from political circumstances，its authors react to those circumstances in ways other than ideological，and talking about novels and stories primarily as instruments of ideology circumvents much of the fictional enterprise.(4)
虽然小说无疑起源于政治情状，但其作者则是以非意识形态的方式对这些政治情状作出反应的，而将小说和故事主要地当作意识形态的工具来探讨，会在相当程度上阻碍小说事业。
难句类型：复杂修饰
解释：本句从句子的结构上来讲，惟一的难度在于and之后的句子的主语talking about novels and stories primarily as instruments ofideology太长，以至于看到谓语circumvent的时候已经搞不清楚主谓了。更大的难度恐怕还在于对两个词汇的理解circumvent和enterprise。我们以前所背过的circumvent有两个词义，一个是规避，一是以计谋战胜，但是这两种意思放到此处都显然不通;其实circumvent有一个我们没有背过的最常用的意思是包围、限制或陷害;至于enterprise常用的意思是企业，这里的指事业。
意群训练：Although fiction assuredly springs from political circumstances，its authors react to those circumstances in ways other than ideological，and talking about novels and stories primarily as instruments of ideology circumvents much of the fictional enterprise.
英语阅读
GRE写作字失误扣分原因分析
GRE写作打字问题扣分情况介绍
根据GRE考试中作文部分的评分标准，因为文章中出现的打字和语法等错误，最多可能会导致0.5-1分的扣分。虽然看似分值很少，但由于GRE作文是按照满分6分计算，因此哪怕是0.5分也非常重要。因此，在GRE作文中，考生应努力避免因为打字错误而导致的扣分，这样才能在写作部分拿到更好的成绩。
GRE写作为何会出现打字扣分?
想要避免在写作中出现打字错误，首先要找到错误原因并加以区分，看看是什么导致的打字出现问题，并根据错误原因采取针对性措施避免错误。一般来说打字错误的原因主要分为以下三种：
1. 强行提升打字速度导致TYPO
因为GRE考试为机考，而且考试时间相当紧张，一些平时电脑用得比较少的考生可能因为不习惯键盘输入，再加上担心考试时间不够而给自己心理上带来了一些额外压力，强迫自己加快打字速度，这样就有可能造成打字错误。
避免方法：针对这种原因造成的打字问题，小编建议大家，特别是那些键盘用得比较少的同学，能够在平时备考过程中就提前使用电脑先适应起来，进行限时的写作练习时就可以通过电脑打字进行，只要熟悉了用法，一般就不太会因为打字太快而出现打字错误了。
2. 对写作词汇拼写掌握不熟练
GRE考试的词汇量虽然没有明确要求，但其实数量还是不少的。有些同学在背单词的时候，可能只是记住了它的长相和基本含义，对于词汇的拼写和具体用法则没有太过留意，刚好混了个脸熟。而到了写作中，想要使用这些单词的时候往往就会因为没有彻底掌握而出现各种拼写和用法上的问题。
避免方法：如果考生是因为这个原因而产生了打字错误，那么就需要把词汇基础再好好巩固一下，特别是对于那些其实没有彻底掌握到位的单词，应该进一步加强记忆，以避免出现拼写和使用上的错误。
3. 手脑不协调手速跟不上思路
有些考生在写文章时会因为思路中断无以为继而痛苦不堪，但也有考生会出现思路太顺反而手速跟不上这样幸福的烦恼。相信大家在写作中可能也偶尔进入过文思如泉涌的状态，脑子里的想法一个接一个，感觉下笔顺畅无比。但这种时候，打字速度反而会跟不上，有些考生为了抓住这种状态而拼命加速，结果反而因为不当心把一些单词给拼错造成了扣分。
避免方法：如果大家是因为这种原因犯错，小编的建议是先写再说，但写完一定要回头检查一下。打字错误一般来说只要通过返回检查，很容易就能被找出来。所以只要能保证检查一遍，那么就不太会再出现这种问题了。
GRE作文范文：新创意
Truly innovative ideas do not arise from groups of people, but from individuals.When groups try to be creative, the members force each other to compromise and, as a result, creative ideas tend to be weakened and made more conventional. Most original ideas arise from individuals working alone.
GRE作文范文参考：
I agree with the speaker on that truly innovative ideas arise from individuals.Nevertheless, it is unfair to claim unilaterally that the groups tend to weaken creative ideas without thinking of their positive effects on the ideas; it is equally important for groups to examine, modify, or even reject the ideas.
First of all, truly innovative ideas are destined to arise from individuals in that inter-personal thinking process is so far impossible. This is to say, when we sit still and have a cluster of phenomena, theories, statistics and so forth of a certain issue in our mind, we are thinking it over yet with no assistance at all. After all it is impossible for one to intrude into other's mind. Following this principle, innovative ideas spark off during the process of meditation, and they are the produced by one's own effort. It is equally possible, however, for people to be inspired by each other, yet this is by no means assistance in thinking. Clues, hints, inspirations are to remind people of things ignored or taken for granted, but have nothing to do with the process of thinking, that is, to sort out the whole vision and draw conclusion. In one word, innovative ideas arise from meditation, which is solely limited within one body, one brain. Therefore innovative ideas are always the product of individual's work.
Nevertheless, it does not suggest that innovative ideas then have nothing to do with group work, and actually it is just the opposite. When a novel thought is brought up, it is of great importance to fully evaluate its validity, feasibility, and consequences if carried out. This point need no further illustration if we think of a father who resolutely stops his 6-year-old son from playing matches. The kid might have intended to try something new, driven by an innovative idea, yet the whole house might have caught fire also since the boy is incapable of dealing with accidents. This is the same case in academic fields. In a chemistry lab for example, a novel route design of synthesizing a new compound is never carried out without further evaluation. Practical conditions such as equipments, reagents, and economic efficiency, namely yield per cost, are always taken into consideration and sometimes restrict the application of those ideas.
This is to say, innovation is usually good but not always practicable. This claim is fully demonstrated in the political field. Governors of all levels must take holistic views of the situation and make balanced decision in order to avoid mistakes; innovative ideas alone cannot justify their practicability and goodwill to others. For instance, when we look back, the development of plastic industry has resulted in great loss in the global ecosystem. Thus we see the disastrous consequences of carrying out such innovative yet premature ideas.
Hence, it is necessary for the groups to assess, remedy, and conclude the value and use of innovative ideas. All innovative ideas should be brought to discussions. With the clash of skeptical attitude of others to the advocating behavior of the thinker, fallacies made in a haste can be easily found and eliminated, which rectifies, sometimes supplements the idea. I don't agree with the speaker on his/her judgment of group work as compromising, weakening and conventionalizing innovation. Group work promotes those justified and useful innovative ideas and rejects those invalid, sometimes dangerous ones, as we see the case between father and son, in a chemistry lab, in all nations around the world. Only after the group censorship can the innovative ideas be carried out and benefit people, and this is the time when its innovativeness is fully appreciated.
In conclusion, I concede that most original ideas arise from individuals, yet I believe the group effort on these ideas should never be downplayed. It is the group that judge,reject or develop these ideas; this process is equally important with the innovative thinking.
GRE作文范文：独立思考
What most human beings really want to attain is not knowledge, but certainty. Gaining real knowledge requires taking risks and keeping the mind open―but most people prefer to be reassured rather than to learn the complex and often unsettling truth about anything.
GRE作文范文参考：
What does most human beings want is not discovery and change but reassurance.Although discoveries and changes are the real impetuses of human civilization, most people prefer reassurance than innovations and changes in that in this world most people are conservative and the discoveries and changes would sometimes harm some ones' benefit, which based on the obsolete systems.
On the one hand, in fact, most people value what they have obtained much more than what would be gain through new ways. This conservative kind of thinking in some sense is very common indeed since trying new ways always means taking risks of losing the present benefit. Take many Chinese workers for example. In China now,during the transformation of economy system, many factories and companies are under the danger of bankruptcy due to their rigid ways of thinking. And the workers in these companies or factories do not have positive attitudes neither. They ignore, or we can say give up, the better chance such as leave the old companies and find a new one which would be more suitable or quite for a short time to study some new skills; but stay where they are to wait for reassurance from the companies or government. the reason for this kind of behaviors is that they are fear for losing the jobs, whish however have little points after all. Simply put, they think they can survive if they keep the salary, but maybe lose everything when taking risks. Actually, these people fail to see the wealth behind changes and discoveries. No pain, no gain. One reluctantly loses something, he/she would not gain more important and valuable.
On the other hand, discoveries and changes would bring new systems and value and moral standards, which would necessarily break the outdated ones. In this sense,discoveries and changes could harm some ones or some classes' benefit. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand the resistance against new things and the preference of reassurance to the obsolete system. The Industry Revolution is just a case in point.
The significant change had brought human beings into a new stage of both material and spirit; but during the revolution, many people hold the point of view that the change is very dangerous to human civilization. Such individuals included peasants,old noble men and some government officials. The fundamental reason for this situation was that such a profound and overall change shook the old social and economy system and thus those depended on such a system felt they were threatened.
For example, the peasants lost their lands and the old noble men lost their taxes from the peasants; even the government officials, were in the fear of losing their positions.Thereby, for the men who would still receive benefit from the obsolete system, they would prefer reassurance than changes and discoveries.
It is true that sometimes changes and discoveries would bring some damage to the present society; yet they would automatically build a new one full of vigor and creativity. So people should not be restrained with the conservative ideas and open their minds to see the future benefit they would gain from the new system built by changes and discoveries. Anyway, new things are always prior to the old ones.
GRE写作
词汇拼写错误
单词拼写错误是GRE写作中最不划算的扣分项，虽然少量的拼写错误可能不会对整体得分产生太大影响，但如果拼错较多，就会影响观感。建议大家写完文章后再快速浏览一遍，检查一下是否存在拼写错误。
用词重复问题
用词重复的问题常见于一些词汇量不足的考生写出的文章中。反复使用同一个词汇，会让你的文章显得累赘啰嗦，也间接暴露出你英文底子不够词汇准备不充分的问题，是写作的大忌。建议考生在写作时间使用多样化的词汇彰显你的底蕴。
用错复杂句式
GRE写作不需要用太过于复杂的句式，考生不要为了文章好看就强行使用自己没有把握的复杂句式，如果写出的复杂句存在各种语法错误，反而会画蛇添足。记住一句话：用最精辟的语言表达出最完整的信息。当然，如果一定要追求句子漂亮，考生可以在作文中放入插入语，伴随状语等形式，这样也可以让文章更显出色。
GRE写作结构类扣分问题
论述逻辑不通
老外非常注重英文写作时候的逻辑，特别是GRE考试考察的一大重点就是逻辑思维能力。而且GRE两篇作文的题材都是很重视文章整体逻辑自洽通顺的议论文。所以在GRE作文里请务必把文章的分段写清楚，全文逻辑架构最好也能够列好提纲再写，让考官能够一眼就看清楚你的逻辑结构，体现出文章的清晰逻辑思路。
首尾段没写好
作文的开头和结尾都很重要，好的开头能直抒观点，开门见山;好的结尾能总结全文，升华主题。因此，开头结尾对于全文来说会起到很大的作用，切忌头重脚轻，更不能因为时间不够就草草收尾甚至忽略了结尾。
作文篇幅太短
作文字数不够，文章篇幅过短是GRE高分作文的大忌。虽然GRE作文没有硬性规定的字数要求，但无论如何，文章一定要具备一定篇幅，篇幅长短从一定程度上代表了考生的创作能力。太短的文章既无法讲清楚要表达的意思，也很容易让考生显得缺乏写作能力。
GRE作文范文：laws
GRE写作练习题目：laws
It is possible to pass laws that control or place limits on people's behavior， but legislation cannot reform human nature. Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts and minds.
通过法律可以控制或者限制人们的行为，但是立法是无法改变人类本性的。法律无法改变人们的感情和思想。
GRE写作范文：
Ever since the Code of Hammurapi comes into being， laws have begun to put restrictions on people's behaviors and have played an important role in the maintenance of social order. But aside from its impact on shaping public deportment， legislation is of no avail to reform human nature as well as mankind thoughts.
Our collective life experience is that we make choices and decisions every day--under a legal system. No one is ever granted the rights to surpass the boundary of laws; otherwise there may be lack of protection for private property and personal right from being violated. Common sense tells us that the laws will punish the wrongdoers severely sometimes so harshly even to sentence the felons to death. It is the awe to controlling authority as well as the fear of castigation that made most of the people away from the illicit behaviors. Laws， for better or worse， have put up a paradigm on which people abide by， for the sake of personal interests and the social stability as well.
Laws can exert their influences on people's “hands and legs”， but when it comes to man's hearts and minds， it cannot. In the long history of its development， laws change over time and vary from region to region not to alter human nature but to be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances， times and places. The end of a legal system impels laws to evolve to keep pace with changing mores， customers， and our collective sense of equity but with little concern for the reconstruction of human thoughts. Bigamy， to be commonly regarded as illegal in most countries， is yet legitimate in some Arabian countries. For Islamic， outlawing bigamy seems an impinge upon their religious freedom of choosing mates. Instead of bringing about a revolution in the conception of marriage among Islamic disciples， laws give way to the entrenched customers. Still more， from the psychotic analysis angle， that laws will change nature is further doubted. Sigmund Freud has divided the individual personality into threefold： the id， the ego and the super ego. The ego， as the surface of the nature and the part you show the world， is governed by the “reality principle，” otherwise known as laws.
However， so powerless are laws to extend its impacts on the id and the superego remains below， each has its own significant effects on the personality. A rapist， for example， despite years of imprisonment may still relapse into outrages in that laws fail to civilize the id desires composing of instinctual drives. By no means can laws alone alter our nature. Were laws by itself be able to cause a change in the human nature and exercise a fundamental influence on people's hearts and minds， then it would probably be no need for its existence. People at no time can ever have imagined this.
In fact， to truly change the human nature， it is through the synergic efforts associating the education， moral and ethic social interactions altogether that brought about a reconstruction of human nature.
In conclusion， in spite the fact that we may live in a harmonious society with the implementation of the laws， it seems unthinkable for laws to undertake the role as a reformer in rebuilding man's nature as well as hearts and minds.
GRE作文范文：成功
Success, whether academic or professional, involves an ability to survive in a new environment and, eventually, to change it.
GRE作文范文参考：
Many wonder the intrinsic impact of industrial revolution over the last century. Is it a blessing or a curse? Ever since the invention of steam engine, mass production enabled factories to make out products in a madly efficient manner, while machines also supplanted innumerous traditionally skilled artisan, forcing them out of work. Gone are the days when they boasted of their craftsmanship that they assumed to be able support their family all their life. Consumers became more aspiring to novel design instead of durability as goods were made to be discarded.
Hundreds years later, with the first installation of integrated circuit on the chip, another profound turnover took place. Now the computer pervades our life so much that one may find himself half illiterate in absence of input skill. This time, thousands of jobs were created in Silicon Valley, transforming some of the few into billionaire over one night. Nevertheless, the original inventor might not expect that the ensuing slow down and thus recession in IT sector would approach so soon in less than 10 years, which is obviously less than a presumable 15 years time normal for a periodical change.Positive or negative, one mark that characterizes the technological bombardment indicates a constant fact: changes exist ubiquitously and operating at an ever-increasing tempo; those who fail to catch up with the torrent of change would ineluctably engulfed by billows, floating no where and eventually dissolve as negligible bubbles.
Favors as well as opportunities goes to who adapt to the contemporary trend. Fully recognizing this axiom, long before the scientists announced accomplishment of sketches of human genes or earlier successful cloning of Doris, candidates preparing for university admission have smelt the sense. Today, in the U.S., biology and its branch disciplines become the first choice for top students of senior high, determining that this subject, foretold as the third wave in technology, could bring them brilliant future as “Bill Gates” dreamt the same in the previous wave.
In addition to academic realm, respect would be paid to people who though deprived of their past secure professions, choose not to be a loser in the whimsical society. Like the artisans who lost jobs, a vast number of skilled laborer in China’s city of Wengzhou have undergone darkness and depression in those old days. However, after years of endeavor and refinement, they prove their value again. By accurately posit the economic trend and market demand, they play an active role in almost all economic sectors, garments, catering and lodging, hi-tech industry, you name it.
While ability honed in surviving the fickleness of the world makes the path through success shorter, it is essential for the more ambitious to acquire the pith of reformist and lead the trend. In this way, it could help him distinguish from the mediocracy and platitude. This is absolutely not an easy task. Inborn insight and foresight are needed to tell uncommon out of the commonplace; extraordinary perseverance and encouragement is a must to face the coming challenges against his iconoclasm. Very few people crowned with triumph possess this quality, whether the Nobel Prize winner or those who makes coverage on the Times.
In sum, as shown in the course of history, success, whether academic or professional,involves an ability to surviving in a new environment and---, eventually, ---to change it.Now some elite persons have again forecast that another social change is impending.Are you ready for that?
GRE写作
GRE阅读哪些原因会影响得分扣分?这3种常见做法对错指点
GRE阅读得分原因1：掌握文章常见结构
对于考生来说，GRE阅读最令人欣慰的一点，也许就是其文章结构的规范性和公式化。几乎所有的GRE阅读文章都是同一个模子里出来的：第一段探讨一个高深的话题，第二段质疑一个关于此话题来自其他人的观点或看法，最后一段作者再给出自己的意见和结论。而最让考生头疼的一点，则是话题本身的无趣性。无论如何，考生在阅读中，需要做到主动去了解熟悉文章结构，通过多阅读掌握GRE文章的常见结构套路，而不是被动的等着看文章然后见招拆招。
GRE阅读得分原因2：通读全文再看题目
关于做阅读，一直以来有这么一种说法，那就是先读题目再看文章，看似能节省很多时间，其实却是最愚蠢不过的做法。带着一肚子问题看文章，先不谈能记住多少问题，首先脑子里就已经塞进了一堆东西，这种状态下的阅读只会降低效率，最后文章没看懂，题目全忘了，白费一番功夫。正确的做法是先读完全文。仔细看完整篇文章并在此基础上进行解题，而不要囫囵吞枣的快速看过，其实什么都没记住。
GRE阅读得分原因3：主动思考取代被动阅读
上面说了不要先看题目，为什么这里又要说带着问题看文章呢?这里的问题，其实是指的一些常见的容易出题点，再看文章的过程中，主动去寻找这些常见问题点，适当做一些标记帮助定位，将有助于快速解题。下面是这些需要在阅读过程中寻找的问题点：
1. 文章讨论的是什么?
2. 就讨论的内容，作者给出了几个解释或理论，分别是什么?作者对于这些解释/理论的态度是什么?
3. 为什么作者觉得自己提出的理论最好?
4. 文章的主题是什么?
GRE阅读扣分原因1：过度重视细节浪费时间
很多GRE阅读文章，都会包含大量的各种细节，有数据、有描述、有具体说明等。对于这些细节，在不影响阅读的情况下，建议大家不要过度深入，看过即可。很多细节其实都是无关紧要的干扰内容，完全不会出现在之后的题目中，考生要做到的是把握整体。不少同学会因为纠结于细节而反反复复的阅读同一段内容，浪费大量时间，殊为不智。
GRE阅读扣分原因2：缺乏阅读积累心态消极
GRE文章的内容，对于考生来说，有时候的确会显得颇为无趣，尤其是一些比较冷门的科技内容，平时即使放在眼前估计也不会去看。带着消极、不想看的态度去解题，当然不会有太好的结果。所以，建议大家在阅读时，尽量把文章内容都想象成自己最想看，最感兴趣的内容，哪怕是自欺欺人，也尽可能的把这些文章当成自己喜欢看的内容，用积极的态度去看文章。
GRE阅读扣分原因3：先看了选项思路被干扰
看完文章，看题目，然后看选项，应该是很多人做题的方法。但GRE阅读的出题者，在这里又为考生设置了陷阱。一道题五个选项，除了正确选项外，其他选项往往都写得似是而非，迷惑性极高，如果考生想要靠脑海中对文章的记忆来一一排除这些选项，往往会反受其扰，混淆了自己原本还算清晰的思路。最好的做法是看完题目后，先不急着看选项，而是根据自己之前对文章的理解，回到文章中找到相关的内容，并总结出自己对于问题的答案，然后带着这个答案，再到选项中去寻找比较匹配的结果。这么做，就能较好的避免被错误选项干扰。
GRE阅读对大部分考生来说还是具有一定挑战性的，因此考生无论是对提分技巧还是扣分原因，都需要做到心知肚明。通过上文的得分和扣分原因对比，相信大家都能够找到自身的不足之处并在备考中及时补足，为GRE阅读实战做好充分准备。
新GRE阅读练习题
The organizers of a music festival are scheduling exactly six master classes, one class per day for six consecutive days. Three of the classes will be given by violinists and three by pianists. The only musicians who can teach the classes are the violinists F, G, H, and J, and the pianists R, S, T, W, and Z. The festival's organizers must observe the following constraints: No musician will teach more than one class. F will not teach unless the first three classes are taught by violinists. If J teaches a class, it will be the sixth. R will teach only if T teaches the first class. No pianist will teach on a day that immediately pre-cedes or immediately follows a day on which W teaches.
1.Which of the following can be the musicians scheduled to teach the master classes, in the order in which they will teach, from first to sixth?
(A) F, J, G, T, Z, S
(B) F, W, H, T, G, Z
(C) G, F, H, T, S, Z
(D) S, G, W, H, R, J
(E) T, G, W, H, R, S
2.If R is scheduled to teach the second class, which of the following could be scheduled to teach the third class?
(A) F
(B) G
(C) J
(D) T
(E) W
3.Which of the following must be true about the schedule of master classes?
(A) J is not scheduled to teach if R is scheduled to teach.
(B) J is not scheduled to teach if T is scheduled to teach.
(C) J is not scheduled to teach if W is scheduled to teach.
(D) W is not scheduled to teach if F is scheduled to teach.
(E) Z is not scheduled to teach if W is scheduled to teach.
4.If pianists are scheduled to teach the fourth, fifth, and sixth classes, which of the following must be true?
(A) F is scheduled to teach the first class.
(B) G is scheduled to teach the first class.
(C) H is scheduled to teach an earlier class than the class Z is scheduled to teach.
(D) R is scheduled to teach an earlier class than the class T is scheduled to teach.
(E) S is scheduled to teach an earlier class than the class T is scheduled to teach.
5.Which of the following must be true about the schedule of the master classes?
(A) If F is scheduled to teach a class, then H is also scheduled to teach a class.
(B) If J is scheduled to teach a class, then R is also scheduled to teach a class.
(C) If J is scheduled to teach a class, then S is also scheduled to teach a class.
(D) If T is scheduled to teach a class, then R is also scheduled to teach a class.
(E) If W is scheduled to teach a class, then Z is also scheduled to teach a class.
6.If classes are scheduled so that the classes taught by pianists and the classes taught by violinists alternate
with one another, which of the following can be true?
(A) F is scheduled to teach the fourth class.
(B) G is scheduled to teach the first class.
(C) H is scheduled to teach the third class.
(D) R is scheduled to teach the fifth class.
(E) W is scheduled to teach the second class.
7.If a violinist is scheduled to teach the first class and another violinist is scheduled to teach the sixth class,which of the following can be true?
(A) F is scheduled to teach the second class.
(B) H is scheduled to teach the sixth class.
(C) R is scheduled to teach the fourth class.
(D) T is scheduled to teach the second class.
(E) W is scheduled to teach the third class.
8.Which of the following CANNOT be true about the schedule of the master classes?
(A) F is scheduled to teach the third class.
(B) G is scheduled to teach the first class.
(C) T is scheduled to teach the sixth class.
(D) W is scheduled to teach the sixth class.
(E) Z is scheduled to teach the fifth class.
答案：AB CCDCD C
新GRE阅读练习题
People whose bodies cannot produce the substance cytochrome P450 are three times as likely to develop Parkinson's disease, a disease that affects the brain, as are people whose bodies do produce this substance.Since cytochrome P450 protects the brain from toxic chemicals, toxic chemicals probably play a role in the development of Parkinson's disease.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?
(A)It will soon be possible for cytochrome P450 to be synthesized for the treatment of people whose bodies cannot produce this substance.
(B)Many people whose bodies are unable to produce cytochrome P450 lack the ability to produce certain other substances as well.
(C)Cytochrome P450 has no effect on the brain other than to protect it from toxic chemicals.
(D)People with Parkinson's disease often exhibit a marked lessening in the severity of their symp-toms when they are treated with dopamine, a chemical produced naturally in the brain.
(E)Many people with Parkinson's disease have the ability to produce cytochrome P450 naturally.
答案：C
新GRE阅读练习题
In a benefit concert each of exactly seven solo performers—Harris, Jones, McIntyre, Nelson, Strapp,Trevino, and Williams—will sing. The concert director is deciding the order in which the performers will sing and is assigning each to exactly one of seven time slots,numbered consecutively 1 through 7, according to the following conditions：
Harris must sing at some time before McIntyre sings.Strapp must sing at some time before Jones sings.
Trevino must sing either immediately before or immediately after Nelson sings.
Williams must be assigned to time slot 3.
1.Which of the following could be the order, from first through seventh, in which the performers sing?
(A)Harris, McIntyre, Williams, Trevino, Nelson, Strapp, Jones
(B)Jones, Harris, Williams, Strapp, McIntyre,Nelson, Trevino
(C)Strapp, McIntyre, Williams, Nelson, Trevino,Harris, Jones
(D)Trevino, Harris, Williams, Strapp, Nelson, Jones,McIntyre
(E)Trevino, Nelson, Harris, Strapp, Williams,McIntyre, Jones
2.If there are exactly four performers who are to sing after Nelson sings but before Strapp sings, Harris must be assigned to time slot
(A)1
(B)2
(C)4
(D)5
(E)6
3.If Williams is to sing immediately after Harris sings and immediately before Trevino sings, which of the following performers could be assigned to time slot 6?
(A)Harris
(B)Jones
(C)Nelson
(D)Strapp
(E)Trevino
4.If Jones is to sing immediately before Harris sings,which of the following must be assigned to time slot 7?
(A)Harris
(B)Jones
(C)McIntyre
(D)Strapp
(E)Trevino
5.If McIntyre is to sing immediately before Strapp sings, Trevino could be assigned to which of the following time slots?
(A)2
(B)4
(C)5
(D)6
(E)7
6.If McIntyre is assigned to time slot 4, which of the following must be true?
(A)Harris is assigned to a lower-numbered time slot than Strapp.
(B)Jones is assigned to a lower-numbered time slot than Trevino.
(C)Nelson is assigned to a lower-numbered time slot than McIntyre.
(D)Strapp is assigned to a lower-numbered time slot than Williams.
(E)Trevino is assigned to a lower-numbered time slot than Jones.
答案：ACB CAD
新GRE阅读练习题
Sleep deprivation is a known cause of workplace error, and many physicians frequently go without sleep for periods of 24 hours or more. However, few of these physicians have, in the course of a routine examination by a peer, been diagnosed with sleep deprivation.So there is little cause for concern that habitual sleep deprivation will cause widespread physician error.
The answer to which of the following questions would be most helpful in evaluating the argument?
(A)Do physicians who have been diagnosed with sleep disorders also show signs of other ills not related to sleep deprivation?
(B)Is the ability to recognize the symptoms of sleep deprivation in others significantly impaired by habitual sleep deprivation?
(C)Do factors other than habitual sleep deprivation ever lead to errors in the workplace on the part of physicians?
(D)Of people who have recently been treated by physicians, what percentage believe that many physicians have occasionally suffered from sleep deprivation?
(E)Is the incidence of sleep deprivation higher among physicians than it is among other health care workers?
答案：B
★ 整改报告原因分析
