以下是小编帮大家整理的英语名著战争与和平读后感（共含16篇），欢迎大家分享。同时，但愿您也能像本文投稿人“临风”一样，积极向本站投稿分享好文章。
关于英语名著战争与和平读后感1
如果说当我手捧《战争与和平》这本书时，是怀着崇敬的心情的话，那么，当我读完《战争与和平》这本书时，我的心却久久不能平静。因为，在此之前，关于俄罗斯大作家列夫?托尔斯泰的《战争与和平》，我已经听说不少，今天，当我完整地学习了《战争与和平》这部小说后，对小说及其作者有了更深的认识。
《战争与和平》以保尔康斯基、别祖霍夫、罗斯托夫、华西里四大贵族家庭在战争与和平年代里的生活为情节线索，生动地展现了18至18间，俄奥联军同法军在奥斯特里茨的会战、法军入侵俄国、莫斯科大火、拿破仑军队溃退等一系列重大历史事件，表现了战士们的爱国主义和英雄主义精神，歌颂了俄国人同仇敌忾精神和人民力量的伟大胜利。场面壮观，结构清晰，具有强烈时代感。体会最深的是，这部小说人物形象非常鲜明、富有个性。如安得烈性格内向，意志坚定，有较强的社会活动能力;彼埃尔心直口快，易动感情，缺少实际活动能力，更侧重于道德理想的追求;女主人公娜塔莎则是个情感丰富，生机勃勃，热爱大自然，接近人民，具有民族气质的女人。他们在保卫祖国的战争中得到了锻炼和成长，这几个主要人物形象都具有较高的认识价值和审美价值。而以库拉金为代表的宫廷贵族的贪婪、虚伪和堕落的个性，也被赤裸裸地刻画出来，并进行了无情的鞭笞。
我觉得，《战争与和平》这样的小说，对我来说，虽然有点深奥而新鲜，但通过这次学习，我对这样的世界名着有了初步的认识和学习欲望。
关于英语名著战争与和平读后感2
俄罗斯著名作家列夫。托尔斯泰撰写的《战争与和平》，被人称为“世界上最伟大的小说”。这部巨著以儿女情长衬托出法俄战争，生动地描写了1805至1820年俄国社会的重大历史事件和各个社会领域，非常值得回味，我怀着崇敬的心情，拜读了这部著作。
小说描写的是：俄罗斯的罗斯泰尔伯爵的`女儿娜塔沙美若天仙，在一次舞会上和一位年轻的公爵安德烈。保尔康斯基相爱。可是，不久后法俄战争爆发，安德烈奔赴沙场，最终负伤身亡。娜塔沙悲痛欲绝，在别人的劝说下无奈改嫁。此时，在俄国人民的打击下，法军溃败。俄国有恢复了其乐融融的景象。这本书充分地表现出俄国人民坚强不屈的精神。
读了《战争与和平》这本书，我感触异常深刻：主人公安德烈忠心报国，最终为国捐躯，他的爱国情怀使我内心久久不能平静：安德烈为了祖国、为了人民，放弃了自己的幸福，终身长眠于九泉之下，守护着自己的祖国。娜塔沙天真善良，十分纯洁。彼埃尔善良真诚，凭着继承的遗产成了上流社会的瞩目人物，可他并不像其他贵族，坚强与邪恶作斗争……这本书真是把那时候的俄国人的思想感情描述的淋漓尽致。
读完这本书，我衷心祝愿人世间不在发生战争，和谐永在!
关于英语名著战争与和平读后感3
如果说当我手捧《战争与和平》这本书时，是怀着崇敬的心情的话，那么，当我读完《战争与和平》这本书时，我的心却久久不能平静。因为，在此之前，关于俄罗斯大作家列夫?托尔斯泰的《战争与和平》，我已经听说不少，今天，当我完整地学习了《战争与和平》这部小说后，对小说及其作者有了更深的认识。
《战争与和平》以保尔康斯基、别祖霍夫、罗斯托夫、华西里四大贵族家庭在战争与和平年代里的生活为情节线索，生动地展现了1805年至1820年间，俄奥联军同法军在奥斯特里茨的会战、法军入侵俄国、莫斯科大火、拿破仑军队溃退等一系列重大历史事件，表现了战士们的爱国主义和英雄主义精神，歌颂了俄国人同仇敌忾精神和人民力量的伟大胜利。场面壮观，结构清晰，具有强烈时代感，体会最深的是，这部小说人物形象非常鲜明、富有个性。如安得烈性格内向，意志坚定，有较强的社会活动能力;彼埃尔心直口快，易动感情，缺少实际活动能力，更侧重于道德理想的追求;女主人公娜塔莎则是个情感丰富，生机勃勃，热爱大自然，接近人民，具有民族气质的女人。他们在保卫祖国的战争中得到了锻炼和成长，这几个主要人物形象都具有较高的认识价值和审美价值。而以库拉金为代表的宫廷贵族的贪婪、虚伪和堕落的个性，也被赤裸裸地刻画出来，并进行了无情的鞭笞。
我觉得，《战争与和平》这样的小说，对我来说，虽然有点深奥而新鲜，但通过这次学习，我对这样的世界名著有了初步的认识和学习欲望。
关于英语名著战争与和平读后感4
战争是政治的延续这是战争的固有属性。政治往往要比战争理智精明的多。而战争本身往往是充满偶然性的，暴力的。其中人的感情是关键的因素。
在现实中消灭敌人的军队和意志力往往要考虑自己的消耗，要考虑自身是否会被敌人消灭，还有当敌人的防御强于进攻时产生的间歇，这样战争也不会向极端发展。综上考虑由于自身的顾虑和客观的情况可能会使战争进程充满不确定性。这种不确定性好像使我们以前的分析失去了意义。实事也说明在很多的`情况下真正的战争(即是两方的真实的撕打)并没有发生。应该认为战争中进行的军事行动应该包括两个方面的内容：一是为真正的战争进行的所有的准备，包括军事动员，物资运输，军队的调整集结。二是真正的战争，真正的撕打。可以知道在两方的力量相差悬殊时，当一方认识到对方的军事力量远远超出自己的力量时，就自动的放弃抵抗。这也是所谓的“不战而屈人之兵”。其实战争进程已经开始了。
这种不确定性并不与战争的目的即使敌人无力反抗矛盾。因为当一方不为消来敌人做准备或决心不进行决占而对方抱有积极的目的时刻消灭对手时，这一方在战争中必然会处于不利的局面，因为他在战争中在没有判定出对方不进行决战的情况下做出了消极的不决战的决心，这样在战争中他必然处于慌乱并且不能集中力量，最大限度使用力量。这样的结果必然是可悲的。
所以使敌人无力反抗，消灭敌人军事力量，摧垮敌人的意志力这个战争目的虽然不是每次战争都要达到的目的，但是它自战争一开始就存在于所有的军事行动中，只是由于政治目的或其它原因缓和或是遏制了。
关于英语名著战争与和平读后感5
托尔斯泰在《战争与和平》中，不仅描写了一个时代的转化过程，更添加了那个时代中人物的观念，拿破伦作
为一个国家的最高统治者，所到之处无不受人们的热烈欢迎和爱戴，但与之相同的是，亚历山大也受到了他的国民的支持，这些足以证明，一个时代的成功或是灭亡，取决于这个时代的最高统治者的影响力。
记得托尔斯泰这样说过：“认为苹果之所以落下是因为细胞组织衰退分解的植物学家和那个认为苹果落下是因为他想吃而祈祷结果的树下小孩一样都是正确的。”这确实是一段极富寓意的话，如果将它与战争联系在一起，我们不妨可以这样理解它：说拿破伦去莫斯科是他愿意去，他的毁灭是因为亚历山大希望他毁灭，这二者同样无法判定谁对谁错。
其实，这历史上的每一个有名的人物，并不是因为他们本身的魅力而让人们记住的，而是由于在他们身上发生了一件或几件让世人为之振奋或震撼的事件，所以人们才记住他们的。从历史角度来看，他们都是不能自已的，因为他们的所有行为都与历史的进程紧密联系在一起，是早就注定的了，他们的自以为是通过世人允许而表现出来的。
《战争与和平》这本书，给我们揭示了人与人之间的敌对或友好的关系，展示了人性，它是本值得赏读的书!
这本书阅读的时间跨度特别长，差不多俩月了，原因有二，书本身就是大部头，经典名作，不易读，其二，这段时间迷上美剧，阅读懈怠很多。
这本长长的战争与和平大名不知道是小学还是初中就听到了，反正真正的阅读是听到这本书的十多年以后，书中的内容说来也不复杂，复杂的是俄国作品中类似欧洲的人名地名让人头疼。很多时候除了关注书的内容本身，还要花心思去记和分辨这些人名。
这本书虽然不是历史书，（作者好像也不认为它是小说，但是我们归类还是会把他归为小说。）但是我阅读完感受最深的二点确实关于历史的，其一就是之前了解到的拿破仑进攻俄国失败因为资源短缺，这本书让我看到的正好相反，法国占有各种优势，一度让俄国首都迫使莫斯科的大部分人撤离莫斯科。其次，就是关于拿破仑的形象，通过作者的一些观点描述，让我了解到，拿破仑或者其他一切容易让人膜拜的形象，更多的可能是不断去强化其光辉形象的结果。我们了解的真实，未必是真实。（当然这两点是基于本书给我的认识。）
很难想象，书的收尾阶段，作者对于科学的开放态度，让我敬畏。原来，我们上学书中所给我们的托尔斯泰或者其他的人物形象，过于单一化。可能有些作家或者人物，比我们所了解到的更让人敬佩，当你更多的去认识他的时候。而托尔斯泰便是其中一位。
用人间的爱去爱，我们可以由爱转为恨;但神圣的爱不能改变。无论是死还是什么东西都不能够破坏它，它是心灵的体质。——题记
在拜读完俄国作家列夫·托尔斯泰的一部著作——《战争与和平》，我觉得列夫·托尔斯泰不仅仅只是一位作家，从书中我仿佛也看到他对军事、哲学、历史等也有高度的透彻，对他的喜爱与崇拜使我对这本家喻户晓的著作有点感想。
小说从18奥斯特利茨战役写到18俄国专制加强潜伏危机的时刻，以法国和俄国之间关系恶化，战争一触即发为主线。但内容并不全是以战争为话题。故事的主人公青年公爵安德烈为了心中的信仰投身到“硝烟四起”的战争中去，把怀孕的妻子交给父亲与妹妹玛丽亚照顾，在军中担任库图佐夫将军的副官，他期望这次战争能为自己带来辉煌与荣耀。而主人公二彼埃尔，他是安德烈留学归来的好友，身份高贵，由于继承了伯爵身后的全部遗产，也是莫斯科数一数二的资本家。居心叵测的监护人拉金公爵看上了彼埃尔的这一点，便计划把相貌美丽但品行不端的小姐爱仑嫁给了他。而同一时间在奥斯特里茨战役中战败的安德烈不幸受了重伤，身心也受到重创的他只好静静养伤。另一边的新婚后的彼埃尔，在不久后就发现妻子爱仑与好友多勃赫夫之间若有若无的暧昧关系，他为了卫护自己的名誉最终与爱仑分居，内心陷入了纠结当中，直到认识了互助会的领导后慢慢开始找到了新的信仰。而在战场上的安德烈回到家的那一晚，妻子正好产下一名男婴后逝世，这让安德烈顿时感到人生已走到尽头，直到遇到活泼漂亮，充满生命力的年轻小姐娜塔莎，可父亲的强烈反对，使得安德烈出国和娜塔莎无奈分开一年，娜塔莎最终奈不住寂寞与爱仑的哥哥阿那托尔私奔。后直到18的一次战争，娜塔看到了将死的安德烈，她向他谢罪并热诚地照顾他，可安德烈最终还是和死亡一起走了。彼埃尔化为农夫刺杀拿破仑却反被俘虏，其妻爱仑在这战火连连的环境下依旧放荡行为，最后因误服堕胎药而死。几番奋战后，俄国最取得胜利。像每个故事完美结局一样，大家过上了幸福美好的生活。
战争，充满着杀戮，为了所信仰的去战争，不去管生命的高贵。的确，战争本就是丧失人性的最野蛮的行为，我记得书中有这么一句话：“我倒下了么……我只知道，我再也不用举着旗子奔跑……再也不用为战争而烦恼了……”安德烈公爵静静地躺在地上。这就是战争，我想大概没有人喜欢战争吧，它不能与一切美好的事物相提，战场不过是洒满鲜血的修罗场。帝王永远是冷漠无情的，战争在他们眼中不过是事关国家利益和荣辱的“打架”。
我厌恶战争，帝王永远是历史的奴隶。但在战争中我看到了俄国人民同仇敌忾，战争，必定会有牺牲者，为了和平，他们甘愿为保卫国家、人民流血。书中也有多处描写在战争这样的环境下，人丑陋的欲望是多么令人厌恶，像放荡的爱仑，示财权如命的拉金公爵，他们的时代终将过去，迎来的只会是和平。
和平的到来，是用铺满鲜血的花朵迎接，战争不会永远，因为正义存在。在这本书中，人间的一切惨剧，各种情欲，人从生下的啼哭婴儿到白发老人的一生阶段，这本书中都应有尽有，斯特拉霍夫曾这样评价。我喜欢安德烈的单纯坚忍，娜塔莎的活泼善良，彼埃尔的温和并不懦弱……他们都不完美，各有各的人性欲望，但上帝说，每个人都会有缺陷，就像被上帝咬过的苹果，有的人缺陷比较大，正是因为上帝特别喜欢他的芬芳，也许他是被上帝咬得特别多的苹果，所以，他是最被上帝所最爱的人。
结局，和平的年代真正来临，婚礼，生育，就像小尼古拉说的：我所能做的，只不过是令爱的人都感到幸福。
《战争与和平》这本书是俄罗斯作家托尔斯泰的著作。虽然书名是战争与和平，但书中的主角并不是有名的战争人物拿破伦、亚历山大三世，而是几个平凡人物：从小被父母宠爱过度，养成了任性、热情的性格的娜塔沙，可怜的索妮亚，爽直、俊美的尼古拉，武功显赫的安德列公爵，纯洁的玛莉亚，正义感强的彼埃尔……述说着他们在**中的爱与缘：
伯爵一家人原本是要回乡下的，但是伯爵的女儿娜塔沙、索妮亚(伯爵哥哥的女儿，由于她的父母双亡，就把索妮亚当成亲生女儿养)已经到了进入社会交界的年龄，所以伯爵不惜一切代价的留了下来，刚好皇宫准备举行一次盛大的舞会，所有妇女都可以来参加。在舞会上，娜塔沙和安德列公爵相爱，并马上定了婚。可是在结婚前，玩女人本领高强的流氓出现了，害得他们破除婚约，娜塔沙差点被爱的诱惑吸引——与流氓私奔。由于伯爵热情好客，所以家产都差不多给他用光了。伯爵的大儿子尼古拉与索妮亚相爱，但由于索妮亚没有财产，所以尼古拉的父母一直不答应他们的婚事。后来由于家境所迫，尼古拉就娶了纯洁、富有的玛利亚为妻，久而久之他们相爱了。安德列公爵在战场负了重伤，却刚好和正要逃亡的伯爵家人奇遇，在娜塔沙的悉心照顾下死去。后来，战争结束后，娜塔沙与正义感强而又慷慨的彼埃尔相爱，并结了婚。过上了幸福的生活
在这些主人公所居住的地方——莫斯科，弥漫着战争的硝烟，但这些平凡人物在这种环境下的爱情与缘分，却是多么的感人。为了国家的和平，多少人献出了自己的鲜血、生命，为了国家的和平，多少人要忍受别离的痛苦，为了国家的和平，多少母亲失去了她们的儿子，多少妻子失去了她们的丈夫，多少个孩子失去了他们的父亲。我又想到小学生语文课本第八册第二十二课《一个中国孩子的呼声》。雷利的父亲倒在了维护世界和平的圣坛，他呼唤和平，他渴望和平之神能永驻人间，他希望全世界能一致行动起来，维护和平，制止战争。我从《战争与和平》这本书中明白了一个道理：“我们要热爱和平。虽然我们只是一个小学生，不可能做到勇敢地把自己的生命保卫和平，但我们能做到的就是从小不要养成有强烈的报复心态，好好努力学习，长大建设祖国。”
读了一遍又一遍，最终才发现，这本书是我永远也读不完的。
有人说，托尔斯泰写《战争与和平》的契机是为了探寻俄国社会的出路，我却始终觉得这种观点过于片面。我认为，一部真正伟大的小说，应该是包罗万象的，而不仅仅局限于一个小小的目的。从《战争与和平》里面，我们可以学到很多东西，包括哲学、历史学、政治学、经济学、军事学甚至宗教学等等，这一切综合起来，就构成了一个庞大的思想体系。这个体系既是主观的，同时又是客观的。说它主观，是因为他来源于托尔斯泰的思考与总结，很多地方都打上了“托氏烙印”;说它客观，则是因为他并不强加于人，而是对人产生潜移默化的影响，使人在“托化”的同时又逐渐凸显出自己的个性来。
另一方面，我又认为，以托尔斯泰的眼界之高、目光之远，他未必会把人类的所谓政治放在眼里。从根本上讲，托尔斯泰所关心的，应该是更广阔的精神与永恒。《战争与和平》里面，托尔斯泰曾不止一次地借皮埃尔、安德烈的大脑来探讨这个问题，探讨的最终结果，他没有告诉我们，这也正是其客观之处。他似乎希望我们去独立思考，并找出答案来。然而，人的思想是不同的，每个人都有自己的观点与见解，所以，凡是读过《战争与和平》的人，都在心里构造了一部属于自己的《战争与和平》。
应该说，《战争与和平》这部书最大的成就在于其思想性，那是无与伦比的。但是，在其它方面，它的成就也同样不凡。
结构安排方面，要处理好这样一部浩瀚的作品原本是非常困难的，托尔斯泰却能够凭借自己的艺术天才，在战争与和平之间穿来插去，井然有序，分毫不乱。而且，托尔斯泰似乎特别擅长描绘那种高难度的大场面，战争、舞会、宴席，他可以用极简短的话把每个人的性格及心理和盘托出，却从无顾此失彼杂乱无章的感觉，这是其他任何作家都望尘莫及的。
语言方面，《战争与和平》始终保持一种质朴大气且与众不同的风格，它并不旗帜鲜明，但内蕴深邃，使人一看便知是托氏文字，比起莎士比亚的雕章琢句来，要强出许多。
《战争与和平》是一部宏伟巨著，它以战争问题为中心，以库拉金、保尔康斯基、劳斯托夫、别竺豪夫四家贵族的生活为线索，展示了19世纪最初的俄国历史，描绘了各个阶级的生活，是一部再现当时社会风貌的恢弘史诗。作品中的各色人物刻画精准细腻，景物如临眼前，虽是19世纪的作品，但流传至今，却没有任何隔阂感，其中流露出来对人性的悲悯情怀，穿越时空背景，仍旧撼动人心。以保尔康斯基、别祖霍夫、罗斯托夫、华西里四大贵族家庭在战争与和平年代里的生活为情节线索，生动地展现了18至18间，俄奥联军同法军在奥斯特里茨的会战、法军入侵俄国、莫斯科大火、拿破仑军队溃退等一系列重大历史事件，表现了战士们的爱国主义和英雄主义精神，歌颂了俄国人同仇敌忾精神和人民力量的伟大胜利。场面壮观，结构清晰，具有强烈时代感。体会最深的是，这部小说人物形象十分鲜明、富有个性。如安得烈性格内向，意志坚定，有较强的社会活动本事；彼埃尔心直口快，易动感情，缺少实际活动本事，更侧重于道德梦想的追求；女主人公娜塔莎则是个情感丰富，生机勃勃，热爱大自然，接近人民，具有民族气质的女人。他们在保卫祖国的战争中得到了锻炼和成长，这几个主要人物形象都具有较高的认识价值和审美价值。
而以库拉金为代表的宫廷贵族的贪婪、虚伪和堕落的个性，也被赤裸裸地刻画出来，并进行了无情的鞭笞。
我认为，以托尔斯泰的眼界之高、目光之远，他未必会把人类的所谓政治放在眼里。从根本上讲，托尔斯泰所关心的，应当是更广阔的精神与永恒。《战争与和平》里面，托尔斯泰曾不止一次地借皮埃尔、安德烈的大脑来探讨这个问题，探讨的最终结果，他没有告诉我们，这也正是其客观之处。他似乎期望我们去独立思考，并找出答案来。然而，人的思想是不一样的，每个人都有自我的观点与见解，所以，凡是读过《战争与和平》的人，都在心里构造了一部属于自我的《战争与和平》。
今天，研读了半年之久的《战争与和平》真的要划下一个小小的句号了，心里颇有依依不舍之情，伟大的著作总有这样的特点，那就是当你要离别它的时候，仿佛离别了亲近的人，而当你展卷重读的时候，又仿佛回到了过去的时光，当年读这部书时的心态与情味，又一一展现开来。伟大著作以开启一个鲜活的精神世界的方式，引领着人的灵魂成长，《战争与和平》正是这样的著作。
在这部巨著的最后一部分《尾声》中，托尔斯泰给了我另一个震撼。尽管这一部分是文学评论家认为写的冗长乏味的部分，然而我却觉得它写的精彩极了。《战争与和平》犹如一条巨龙，而尾声恰如点睛，托尔斯泰离开了具体历史的陈述，也离开了那些活生生的人物和情节，上升到了一个特别的高度——论述自由意志，而且论述得精妙、深刻、透辟。除了这样的结尾能承托起这阙宏大的史诗，我想象不出另一种结尾能如此完美。
在这个长长的结尾部分，托尔斯泰首先探讨了历史事件的“原因”，他认为，表面上看来是“权力”在起作用，而实质上，权力必须作用于“合力”形成的那个方向上，否则就如同向虚空中击掌，又如抽刀断水，得不到任何回应与实效。拿破仑远征俄国，表面上看仿佛是拿破仑在下命令，而实际上拿破仑有过诸多军事计划和命令方案，但远征俄国是真的变为了现实，不能不说是由于它符合了历史的某种必然规律。于是，从此出发，托翁以浓墨重彩探讨了自由与必然的关系问题。
托尔斯泰大致认为，在理性看来，自由意志是个幻觉，是一种“一瞬间无法确定的生命感觉”，然而在形上学(灵性)看来，自由意志则是生命的全部，是人之所以为人的最精髓之处。我们不能想象完全的自由，一个人无论如何想象不受外界的影响，我们永远不可能获得空间上和时间上的自由概念，在空间上的运动，遵循必然规律，在时间上的思考与判断，也受到一系列的制约。然而最关键的是：我们无法想象我们的行动没有原因，“理智的第一个要求就是假设和找到原因，因为没有原因我们就无法想象任何行动。我举手，没有任何原因，但我要做一个没有原因的动作，这就是我行为的原因。”多么精彩的论证啊!如果托尔斯泰沉溺于具体的科学知识(例如力学或生理学)的论述来反驳自由意志，那么他的论证可以被科学的发展所推翻，至少是牵连缠绕有不决断处，但是，他却顿挫一下，转入更高层次的概括，如太极之勾手引带，拨转自如，结论却难以撼动，实在可以媲美职业哲学家!
更重要的是，托尔斯泰并没有沉溺于一端而忽视了另一端，他接下来论证绝对的必然也是不可能的。因为大千世界的规律无穷无尽，各种条件与原因亦无穷无尽，人不可能认识所有的规律与条件，于是，总是不会有完全的必然。“一个垂死的人、一个未出世的胎儿或一个白痴，他们完全没有自由，我们观察的人的概念也就不存在了，因为没有自由，就不成其为人。”由于超时空的、全知全能的人的不存在，于是，人总可以透出必然性的约束而得其自由。托翁在这里表现出的是不可知论的立场，由于我们对宇宙和人生的实质是不可知的，因此，自由就奠定在这不可知之上，这恰是二十世纪的自由意志论(古典自由主义者)的公论。可知论、唯物论的世界中，没有自由，只有所谓“微分方程”和“混沌”，然而来自“混沌”的自由并非自由，真正的自由源于意志的自主与自律。
然而，以上的论证仍然是“执其两端”的，托翁还论证了另一个重要的真理：自由与必然的共生性。自由意志恰恰是依系于必然规律而生的，一方面，没有物理与生理的过程，思想只能是空中楼阁，另一方面，即使我们认知到了千万条规律，我们总是可以说：我们当时可以这么做而不是那么做，于是，这种试图超越规律的约束的意志，即是自由意志。恰如我们即使做了一万件恶行，却总可以说：当时忍住就好了，我还是可以为善的。于是，人性仍然是向善的——分辨善恶即是根本善。人性中包含着自由意志——试图超越束缚即是自由之源。人的自由意志的最突出表现，即是人能意识到自由意志。在观察者看来，它与其他过程或许难以分别，但在行动者看来，它是最重要的行动之源。
接下来托尔斯泰论述历史学——如果历史学承认有不服从规律的自由意志的存在，并且认为它是历史事件发展的原因，那么就不可能有历史规律，也就取消了阐释历规律的历史学。于是，自由在历史学中的地位，应当让位于对规律的探索，我们可以认为自己是自由的，坚持这一看法就如同站立在坚实的大地之上，然而又是服从历史规律的(托翁所说的历史规律，实则是社会科学的一般规律)，坚持这一看法，就仿佛认识到了大地在按照规律(万有引力)在不断运动。于是，贞定之志(自由，就其落实于长期生活计划的完成而言，确实是静定贞一的)与顺历史规律而动，是统一的而非分离的，从这一点上说，18的拿破仑恰恰是不自由的，而皮埃尔、鲍尔康斯基这些人，则在历史大势中保持了自由之心，于风云舒卷、大浪淘沙之时，深识彻见了人性的本源。于是，不盲目地推断因果链条中的原因，不狂热崇拜伟人的天才，肩负起自己的历史使命前行，同时也决不傲然得意、津津乐道于自己的“自由选择”，这正是《战争与和平》给予我们的最大教益。
《战争与和平》是俄罗斯伟大作家列夫·托尔斯泰留给世界文学史的一部不朽名著。小说《战争与和平》以库拉金、罗斯托夫、鲍尔康斯基和别朱霍夫四大贵族家庭的生活为情节线索，气势磅礴地反映了十九世纪初到二十年代俄国社会的重大历史事件。小说最突出的艺术成就是那气势磅礴、宏大复杂的结构与严整有序的布局。以下读后感由本网站为大家整理提供，希望大家喜欢。
《战争与和平》是一部带有浪漫主义色彩的小说，这部长篇巨制中，值得我们细细品味。
小说从家庭生活场景和战争场面的描写入手，站在宏观视角，描绘了19世纪俄国的社会生活。
首先，小说人物处理有自己独到的见解。
《战争与和平》多出运用对比的手法，用其浪漫色彩的语言来劝勉世人。并不写一些“高大全”的人物，小说中，有渐渐由有许多不良嗜好一步步蜕变为一个顶天立地的男子汉的比埃尔;也有在国难当头只是仍然寻欢作乐，沉浸在奢华糜烂的生活中无法自拔的艾伦等贵族。
在描述他们的时候，作者是想通过描写来表现自己心中美好的愿景的，但是他还是会从一个人不成熟的一面写起，这样也更加的真实动人。也许有人会说，像小说描写的比埃尔参加决斗，娜塔莎甘愿离家出走追求所谓的爱情是一种不好的，不应该写的东西。那就有失偏颇了。我国近代的学衡派，观点保守，他们也认为西方一些小说描写一些社会中的负面信息，这样是令人作呕的，是不良的。但是大家细看小说又会发现，其实，在比埃尔参加决斗之后，又描写到他的对手其实在家中是个孝子，是个对待自己姐妹很和善的人。小说中还写到比埃尔在决斗前后内心的斗争与挣扎……这写情节真切地反映出，描写不良的事情，有没有经过作者自己的真实的、诚实的思考，托尔斯泰在写这部作品的时候，有没有经过这样的思考是显而易见的。大家可以试想一下，如果有作家只是单纯描写不良的事情，而命运在之间穿插或者是引导读者作出理性的思考，那么这样的作品就只能是一种宣扬腐朽、落后文化的载体。
描写出他们渐渐“成长”的一面，这也使得小说的任务形象更加丰满。小说中的人物娜塔莎据说原型是托尔斯泰的母亲，但是在小说中，也写到娜塔莎遇见所谓的爱情时迷失了自己，无法理性进行判断，险些被恶人诱拐，差点就酿成大错。比埃尔呢，在小说的上半部分，是一个贪图享乐，脾气暴躁的人，但是他通过各种方式，找到自己身上的不足，下苦工夫改变自己，使得自己的性格更加趋于完善，也许，他是作者美好的期望吧。
其次，这部小说还在分析历史的成因有不同于一般思维的特点
用哲学的角度分析历史的成因以及历史人物活动与历史演变的关系，而不再是用以往其他人的那种唯心主义的眼光片面地看待历史的演变过程(小说中提到的英雄人物决定历史进展显然是唯心的、不合逻辑的)，这又是它与其他小说不同的一点。悲伤而有冷静，欢乐而不是风度。它从一个全面、客观的角度来看待社会生活中的人与事，虽然这部小说被划分在浪漫主义小说中，但我觉得，《战争与和平》是一部浪漫主义与现实主义结合的比较好的作品。
从小说的写作方面，我想谈谈我的几点看法。
第一，在人物刻画方面，小说善于设置矛盾冲突来展现人物性格。《战争与和平》中刻画了两种人物，借用哈代小说的说法，一种就是灵肉性人物。比如娜塔莎;还有一类肉性人物，比如艾伦。这两类人物，在平静的生活中展现人物性格仍远远不够，在激烈的矛盾冲突中，更能浓墨重彩地展现人物性格并展现当时社会文化特点。小说通过这种渐进的过程给读者的冲击更加强烈，就像平静的海洋亲眼见到波浪时，还是会被那壮阔的景象所深深折服。
第二，小说善于描写恢弘的场面，给人以壮阔之美。和《德伯家的苔丝》相比较，我们就可以发现，《德伯家的苔丝》描写的故事情节属于半封闭状态，似乎与外界的联系很少，无论是某个小说人物遭到非议什么的，都是小说中的主要人物对其产生非议，而不是所谓的“当时社会上”的人。这就有种不太真实的感觉。人是生活在社会中的人，每个人的一举一动都或多或少会引起其他社会上的人的反应，而不是单纯地只是几个人在那里发议论。我认为这是《德伯家的苔丝》在叙述中出现的不足。因为作者他已经将故事情境和人物遭遇做了较为真实的处理，而单单在社会环境这一方面处理成与世隔绝的状态，显然有逃避现实之嫌，就像在编织一个梦一般的童话。在《战争与和平》中，作者将人物的一举一动放到“当时的社会”这个大环境中去，在给人真实感的同时，也是作品的意义更加特别。据说，俄国人是喜欢《战争与和平》的，因为他里面塑造了别佳、安德烈等几个安国人物形象，他们为他们的祖国抛头颅，洒热血，使得“战争”时期向“和平”时期过度，为当时的社会稳定作出了卓著的贡献，宣扬了爱国主义思想。但是我觉得，爱国主义思想是一个国家在任何时期都应该有的，而且，引申开来，小说这种渐进的叙述方式也向我们传递了一个信息：爱国主义思想的培养不是一蹴而就的。看看小说中的人物别佳，他不在战争的场面中时，更多展现为是一个关心周围人的人。当他请求参加军队时，当他冲锋陷阵时，他展现出的更多的是爱国主义。
我就在想，如果只会空谈爱国主义，是无法达到使被教育者真真正正地培养出爱国主义思想的。只有在孩子小时候就教育他关爱周围的人，在他们长大后，自然而然会热爱他们的祖国。
最新的《战争与和平》英语读后感
If we say that when I was holding “War and Peace” This book is, with respect mood , then, when I read “War and Peace” this book, I heart it can not be quiet for a long time. Because, before that, on the Russian writer Lev? Tolstoy “War and Peace”, I have heard a lot of that today, when I complete the study of “War and Peace” after the novel of the novel and its author had a deeper understand .
Russian writer Lev Tolstoy is one of the world no one can almost anywhere else in the a great writer. He literary creation, not only numerous, but the rich genre known as the 19th century social life of Russia encyclopedia as a mirror reflection of the real Russian social life during that period all the contradictions and the great social change.
“War and Peace” by Paul, Bezuhov, Rostov, Huaxi in the four noble family in the years of war and peace life for plot clues, vividly demonstrated from 1805 to 1820 inter - Russia Austrian coalition with the French army in Austerlitz battle, the French invasion of Russia, Moscow fire rout the army of Napoleon and a series of important historical events, showing the soldiers patriotism and heroism spirit, extolling the spirit of the Russian people and the people of enemy forces a great victory. Spectacular scenes, structural clarity, with a strong sense of the times. Experience the deepest is that the novel is very vivid characters, rich character.
Andrew personality as introverted, strong-willed, strong social activities; lack of practical activities, more emphasis on moral ideals pursuit; heroine Natasha is Emotion is a rich, vibrant, loving nature, closer to the people, with national temperament a woman. They defend the homeland, war has been tempered and the growth of the main characters in the image of these have a higher recognize the value and aesthetic value. By Kula payments on behalf of court nobles greed, hypocrisy and degradation personality, has been portrayed by the naked, and carried out a ruthless whipping.
I think, “War and Peace” This novels, for me, though a bit esoteric but fresh, but through this study, I do the world's masterpiece of the initial understanding and the desire to learn.
如果我们说,当我拿着这本书是“战争与和平”,关于心情,然后,当我读《战争与和平》这本书,我的心不能安静了很长一段时间。因为,在此之前,在俄罗斯作家列夫?托尔斯泰《战争与和平》,我听过很多,今天,当我完成《战争与和平》的研究在小说的小说及其作者有一个更深层次的理解。
俄国作家列夫•托尔斯泰是世界上其他地方几乎没有人能在一个伟大的作家。他的文学创作,不仅很多,而且丰富的类型被称为19世纪俄罗斯社会生活的百科全书的镜面反射真正的俄罗斯社会生活在此期间所有的矛盾和巨大的社会变革。
达官,的别祖霍夫“战争与和平”,保罗,罗斯托夫,华西村在贵族家庭的四年的战争与和平的生活情节线索,生动地展示了从18到18国际米兰——俄罗斯与法国军队在奥斯特利茨战役中,奥地利联盟法国入侵俄罗斯,莫斯科火溃败军队拿破仑和一系列重要的历史事件,显示士兵们爱国主义和英雄主义精神,赞美俄罗斯人民的精神和人民的敌人一个伟大的胜利。壮观的场面,结构清晰,强烈的时代感。体验最深的是,这部小说非常生动的`角色,丰富的角色。
安德鲁性格内向,意志坚强,强大的社会活动;缺乏实践活动,更强调道德理想追求,女主角娜塔莎是感情丰富,充满活力,热爱大自然,接近人民,国家气质的女人。他们保卫祖国,战争已经缓和,增长的主要人物的形象这些有较高的认识价值和审美价值。由库拉支付代表宫廷贵族的贪婪、虚伪和堕落的个性,描绘了裸体,进行了无情的鞭打。
我认为,《战争与和平》这小说,对我来说,虽然有点深奥但新鲜,但通过这个研究,我世界的杰作最初的理解和学习的欲望。
Austins “pride and prejudice”， as she puts it， is thin on two inches ofivory carving， it is the masterpiece of Austin。 Reflect the marriage problems ofnovel is a， the author works in the most is her favorite works。
Works of vivid reflects the late 18th century to the early 19th century ina conservative and occlusion of the British town life and the world。 Its socialgraffiti like novels not only attract the readers at that time， solid to today，still give the reader a unique artistic enjoyment。 She was the first torealistically portray ordinary grace novelist in daily ordinary life， plays anessential role in English novel。
The whole works， not least no winding ups and downs of the plot， but it isthis simple， delicate and attracted us deeply。 Austin， short life is spent inthe country， almost all around may be simple， halcyon atmosphere nurtured hercool temperament。 Not because there is no abundant experience， for the analysisof things for her ability to doubt。
People read the book pride and prejudice “will be fine for her， keenemotion。 When writing ”pride and prejudice“， she is just a teenage girl， isntthis a gift? She does very little contact with the outside world， but thought，imagination， the existence of all this is enough。
Pride and Prejudice is my favorite novel， which impresses me for a longtime。 It describes a love story mainly between Elisabeth， who I like the best，and a rich and proud man， Darcy。
The story began with the arrival of a crowd of rich men who rent a housenear the Bennet。 In a ball， Elisabeth gave such a bad impression on Darcy’sfirst pride that she refused Darcy’s first proposal。 Darcy was so surprised byElisabeth’s refusal that he loved Elisabeth more deeply。 And Elisabeth’santipathy made Darcy realize his shortings。 He was not angry about Elisabeth’scensure， but also he changed his previous proud attitude。 During Elisabeth’stravel in Darcy’s manor。 Darcy was very nice to her uncle and aunt， differentfrom previous proud attitude。 When one of Elisabeth’s sisters ran away withWickham， Darcy helped Elisabeth find her sister and prevent her sister from theloss of reputation， with nobody knowing that it was he who helped the Bennet。 Somany changes in Darcy eliminated Elisabeth’s prejudice。 At last it end withtheir marriage。
Taking the daily life as its material， this story reflected the life andlove in a conservative and blocking England town。 It reflected the author’s viewabout marriage that it is fault to marry for property， money and status and itis also foolish to take these elements into account。 In fact Darcy’s pridemanifested the gap between their statuses。 Since his pride existed， there is noideal marriage between Elisabeth and Darcy。 From the different attitudes fromDarcy’s two proposals， it reflected the feminine pursuit of personalityindependence and right equality， which is a progressive character from the imageof Elisabeth。
sense and sensibility was the first jane austen published. though she initially called it elinor and marianne, austen jettisoned both the title and the epistolary mode in which it was originally written, but kept the essential theme： the necessity of finding a workable middle ground between passion and reason. the story revolves around the dashwood sisters, elinor and marianne. whereas the former is a sensible, rational creature, her younger sister is wildly romantic——a characteristic that offers austen plenty of scope for both satire and compassion. commenting on edward ferrars, a potential suitor for elinor's hand, marianne admits that while she ”loves him tenderly,“ she finds him disappointing as a possible lover for her sister.
soon however, marianne meets a man who measures up to her ideal： mr. willoughby, a new neighbor. so swept away by passion is marianne that her behavior begins to border on the scandalous. then willoughby abandons her; meanwhile, elinor's growing affection for edward suffers a check when he admits he is secretly engaged to a childhood sweetheart. how each of the sisters reacts to their romantic misfortunes, and the lessons they draw before coming finally to the requisite happy ending forms the heart of the novel. though marianne's disregard for social conventions and willingneto consider the world well-lost for love may appeal to modern readers, it is elinor whom austen herself most evidently admired; a truly happy marriage, she shows us, exists only where sense and sensibility meet and mix in proper measure.
movie: mission impossible iii while summer isn't officially here, it is here in terms of movies. mission impossible 3 kicks off the summer movie season with a bang with an interesting and entertaining installment in the money-ma-ki-ng franchise. tom cruise reprises his ethan hunt role and j.j. abrams takes the director's chair. what makes the mission impossible franchise so interesting is the constant change of directors. if you look at other franchises like lethal weapon, pink panther, indiana jones, etc, the directors usually stay on board for the sequels. even with the james bond franchise you have directors usually doing several bond films in a row. mission impossible was helmed by brian de palma and was all espionage with light action. action maestro john woo took the second one and made an explosive and entertaining action sequel even if it was a little over cooked. j.j. abrams makes his feature film directorial debut with mission impossible 3, which is a little bit of espionage and a little bit of action. for those who don't know abrams, he started out writing films like armageddon and regarding henry. he then broke into the television scene with alias, a pretty popular show. he became very well known recently for his latest show. abrams is the creator of lost, one of my favorite shows. so, i was excited to see his first movie. m:i-3 has ethan hunt trying to settle down and start a normal life, but he is thrown back into his old job when an arms dealer played by phillip seymour hoffman wants him to track down the rabbit's foot. the rabbit's foot is some kind of weapon of madestruction, and if hunt doesn't retrieve it in 48 hours his fiance will be killed. what follows are explosive action sequences that sing the right tune to satisfy all of our action appetites. the movie is good, but i couldn't help feeling like something was lacking. i tried to pinpoint it, and the only thing that i could come up with was that it lacked style. sure it had lost written all over it. the tight close ups, starting the film by showing the ending and then rewinding back to the beginning, getting michael giacchino to compose an almost identical score to lost, even re-creating a scene from lost at the end, but still the movie didn't feel like it had an overall style. the reason why i liked m:i-2 was that it had john woo style. the slow motion build up, the doves, and of course hans zimmer's amazing music. i'm just saying that mission impossible 3 is good, but it's not a definative action movie that stands out from the rest, let's see how abrams develops his techniques with future projects now that he's broken into the movie scene
英语名著读后感
――《傲慢与偏见》读后感
I’ve read a book called Pride and Prejudice written by Jane Austen during this winter holidays. Jane Austen was unmarried all her life. She was born in a mid-class family and was brought up in a comfortable environment with harmonious surroundings, so there’s not too many conflicts in her sight neither in her novel. In Pride and Prejudice she talked different ideas about love and marriage through different characters.
The novel has told an interesting story: Mr. Bennet is an English gentleman with an estate in Hertfordshire. He has five unmarried daughters but no sons while his inheritance must be inherited by a male, so Mrs. Bennet has been keen to seek husband for her daughters with great enthusiasm. One day the Bennets had a new neighbor called Bingley who was a wealthy bachelor and followed be the target of Mrs. Bennet. At a ball Bingley fell in love with Jane Bennet who’s the oldest daughter of the Bennets. Bingley’s friend Darcy also came to the ball and struck the sights, many girls liked him while he thought all of them couldn’t suit his preference, including Elizabeth. Mr. Darcy always shows others a impression of pride, having found this Elizabeth began to hate Mr. Darcy. Before long Darcy fell in love with Elizabeth Bennett（second oldest daughter in the Bennets） because of her lovely behavior, while Elizabeth is disgusted by his pride and has a prejudice about him. The official Wickham was welcomed by the villagers, and Elizabeth also took a shine to him. Wickham told Elizabeth that his father had been the steward of the Darcys. The old Darcy had regarded Wickham as his own son and showed more love to him than to Mr. Darcy. After the old Darcy died, the property should be inherited by Wickham was all deprived by Mr. Darcy, also was his pastorate. All this increased Eli’s prejudice about Mr. Darcy. At another ball Mr. Darcy invited Elizabeth to dance with him, but Eli refused him. Eli’s elder male cousin Mr. Collin came to Hertfordshire to inherit the Bennett's property by rules, he wanted to marry with one of the Bennets. Having known that Jane was already engaged with Mr. Bingley, he asked Elizabeth to marry him but was seriously rejected. At last he proposed to Charllote who was Eli’s friend. Mr. Collins was good at flattering and he got the pastorate with the help of Lady Catherine. Once his family was invited to Rosings Garden by Lady Catherine. Elizabeth also went there with Mr. Collin and Charllote. There she met Mr. Darcy who’s Lady Catherine’s nephew. Later in a garden, Sir William told Eli about Mr. Darcy’s latest act of dissuading Mr. Bingley’s marring Jane Bennet which caused Eli’s exceedingly anger. Then Mr. Darcy came to the Collins’ and confessed his love for Elizabeth, of course he was rejected impolitely. Afterwards Mr. Darcy wrote a letter to Eli in order to remove her misunderstandings of him. Elizabeth’s uncle and aunt were also impressed by Mr. Darcy’s politeness. Gradually Eli’s prejudice of Mr. Darcy diappeared. Eventually they became couple.
The writer Jane Austen disclosed mid-class young ladies’ different ideas of marriage and love through describing the different ways in which the Bennet girls doing with their marriage problems ,and this undoubtedly shows the writer’s idea about love and marriage: it’s wrong to get married just for property, wealth and status while neither would it be without caring about those elements.Jane Austen just attached great significance to marriage through her novel by telling people that marriage should be regarded carefully cause it is not a game you could just enjoy without prudent consideration. She also wanted to deliver information that marriage should be based on real love between the lovers. The female subject Elizabeth is a mid-class girl, and Darcy proposed to her regardless of the gap between them, but Elizabeth refused because of his pride had formed Eli’s prejudice. Cause Darcy’s pride was a suggest of status gap between he and Eli, he wouldn’t have the same thought with Eli and consequently the ideal marriage. But later Darcy’s doings especially his change of the prideful manner eliminated Eli’s misunderstandings and prejudice about him, and Eli accepted his proposal. Those two opposite attitudes reflect female’s pursue of independent personality and equality. I think Elizabeth has personality ethic which caused her independent idea about love and marriage and in consequence she earned a happy life. There’re also Eli’s sisters’ love stories served as contrasts to the female subject’s ideal marriage, such as Charlotte and Collin’s life: they do had a luxury life, but there’s no real love between them and this kind of marriage is surely a tragedy of society.
英语名著读后感
Published in 1847, WUTHERING HEIGHTS was not well received by the reading public, many of whom condemned it as sordid, vulgar, and unnatural--and author Emily Bronte went to her grave in 1848 believing that her only novel was a failure. It was not until 1850, when WUTHERING HEIGHTS received a second printing with an introduction by Emily's sister Charlotte, that it attracted a wide readership. And from that point the reputation of the book has never looked back. Today it is widely recognized as one of the great novels of English literature.Even so, WUTHERING HEIGHTS continues to divide readers. It is not a pretty love story; rather, it is swirling tale of largely unlikeable people caught up in obsessive love that turns to dark madness. It is cruel, violent, dark and brooding, and many people find it extremely unpleasant. And yet--it possesses a grandeur of language and design, a sense of tremendous pity and great loss that sets it apart from virtually every other novel written.
The novel is told in the form of an extended flashback. After a visit to his strange landlord, a newcomer to the area desires to know the history of the family--which he receives from Nelly Deans, a servant who introduces us to the Earnshaw family who once resided in the house known as Wuthering Heights. It was once a cheerful place, but Old Earnshaw adopted a ”Gipsy“ child who he named Heathcliff. And Catherine, daughter of the house, found in him the perfect companion: wild, rude, and as proud and cruel as she. But although Catherine loves him, even recognizes him as her soulmate, she cannot lower herself to marry so far below her social station. She instead marries another, and in so doing sets in motion an obsession that will destroy them all.
WUTHERING HEIGHTS is a bit difficult to ”get into;“ the opening chapters are so dark in their portrait of the end result of this obsessive love that they are somewhat off-putting. But they feed into the flow of the work in a remarkable way, setting the stage for one of the most remarkable structures in all of literature, a story that circles upon itself in a series of repetitions as it plays out across two generations. Catherine and Heathcliff are equally remarkable, both vicious and cruel, and yet never able to shed their impossible love no matter how brutally one may wound the other.
As the novel coils further into alcoholism, seduction, and one of the most elaborately imagined plans of revenge it gathers into a ghostly tone: Heathcliff, driven to madness by a woman who is not there but who seems reflected in every part of his world--dragging her corpse from the grave, hearing her calling to him from the moors, escalating his brutality not for the sake of brutality but so that her memory will never fade, so that she may never leave his mind until death itself. Yes, this is madness, insanity, and there is no peace this side of the grave or even beyond.
It is a stunning novel, frightening, inexorable, unsettling, filled with unbridled passion that makes one cringe. Even if you do not like it, you should read it at least once--and those who do like it will return to it again and again
Oliver twist, one of the most famous works of charles dickens’, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in britain in 18th century.
The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in london.
The hero of this novel was oliver twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. he suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. while reading the tragic experiences of the little oliver, i was shocked by his sufferings. i felt for the poor boy, but at the same time i detested the evil fagin and the brutal bill. to my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and oliver lived a happy life in the end. one of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of mrs. maylie and rose and began a new life. he went for walks with them, or rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. he felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.
How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? the reason is the nature of goodness. i think it is the most important information implied in the novel by dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. although i don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet i do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.
For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. goodness is to humans what water is to fish. he who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. on the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘the fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. people receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.
To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. they look down on people’s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. as a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. on the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. in their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. if they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. they are one of the sorts that i really detest.
Francis bacon said in his essay, ‘goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.’
That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. therefore, i, a kind person, want to tell those ‘vermin-to-be’ to learn from the kind oliver and regain the nature of goodness.
I've just fininshed reading the first 4 harry potter books for about the 5th time through, and they're just as magical and affecting as they have ever been. everything is in here: suspense, adventure, mystery, humour, danger. there's even some pretty satisfying paybacks. the characters are fantastic and fantastically realistic. there are bad people who turn out to be good guys and good people who turn out to be bad guys, just like life.
I think the thing i like best about these books is the message that it's okay to be different - to be not ”normal." i would love for everyone in school to have hear that message. it would probably reduce the bullying around the school.
These books value real thoughts. much has been made of harry's rule breaking, but only once in the series so far does he break a rule for arbitrary personal gain. most of the time he makes a decision that what's right is more important than what's written. and you know what? life's like that sometimes. i think it's great that kids are getting an example of how to do what's right even when it involves breaking rules. the potter books also show that there are consequences for rule breaking. if not getting caught and getting a detention, then a spell going wrong and someone getting turned into a cat. this shows that when you make a decision to go against the rules that things may not go as you expected and you have to take responsibility for the outcome.
★ 英语名著读后感
★ 战争与和平读后感
