小编在这里给大家带来哈姆雷特英语读后感（共含12篇），希望大家喜欢!同时，但愿您也能像本文投稿人“wangjlmer”一样，积极向本站投稿分享好文章。
【英文】
“Hamlet ” of Shakespear is a classical representative work. This book certainly does not have the big difference in the superficial plot with the historical fable,spoke or the Danish prince the story which revenged for the father,in which fills the rank smell of blood violence and dies.Just like the dramatis personae Horatio said:“ you may hear to to rape massacre,the unusual repair behavior,the dark center decision,accidental slaughter,borrows the hand murder , as well as falls into suicide result.”
Windingly elects the plot,tightly centers on the revenge to launch. Hamlet Wittenberg hurries back the home in a hurry from Germany,is attends his father's funeral,enables him to accept,he not catches up with father's funeral,actually witnessed the mother and the Uncle Claudius' wedding ceremony， this had caused Hamm the Wright suspicion at the heart,added night above meets in the royal palace castle with father's ghost, the ghost sorrow sued, this pile atrocity was Uncle Hamlet the behavior,and wanted him to revenge for the father.To this, he started the difficult revenge course,launched the life and death contest with Claudius.Finally,sent out sword the revenge to Claudius
Hamlet is a man with contradictory,he had many chances to kill Claudius,but he hesitated,which reflects the religious thought poisons.
【中文】
莎士比亚的《哈姆雷特》是一个经典的代表作。这本书肯定没有大区别表面情节与历史的寓言,说话或丹麦王子的故事为父亲报仇了,在这充满血液暴力和死亡的气味。就像剧中人荷瑞修说:“你可能会听到强奸屠杀,修复的反常行为,黑暗中心的决定,偶然的屠杀,借手谋杀,以及属于自杀的结果。”
得隐晦曲折情节,选举严格复仇发射中心。哈姆雷特威滕伯格匆忙匆忙回到家里从德国,参加他父亲的葬礼上,使他接受,他没有赶上父亲的葬礼,真正目睹了母亲和叔叔克劳迪斯的`婚礼,这造成了汉姆莱特猜疑心,上面说晚上在王宫城堡与父亲的鬼魂,鬼魂悲伤起诉,这桩暴行是哈姆雷特的行为,叔叔,希望他为父亲复仇。这一点,他开始了艰难的复仇,与克劳迪斯创办了生与死的竞赛。最后,发出剑克劳迪斯的报复
哈姆雷特是一个矛盾的人,他有很多的机会去杀克劳迪斯,但是他犹豫了一下,这反映了宗教思想的毒药。
“ Hamlet ” of Shakespear is a classical representative work. This book certainly does not have the big difference in the superficial plot with the historical fable, spoke or the Danish prince the story which revenged for the father, in which fills the rank smell of blood violence and dies.Just like the dramatis personae Horatio said: “ you may hear to to rape massacre, the unusual repair behavior, the dark center decision, accidental slaughter, borrows the hand murder , as well as falls into suicide result.” Windingly elects the plot, tightly centers on the revenge to launch.
Hamlet Wittenberg hurries back the home in a hurry from Germany, is attends his father‘s funeral, enables him to accept, he not catches up with father‘s funeral, actually witnessed the mother and the Uncle Claudius‘ wedding ceremony, this had caused Hamm the Wright suspicion at the heart, added night above meets in the royal palace castle with father‘s ghost, the ghost sorrow sued, this pile atrocity was Uncle Hamlet the behavior, and wanted him to revenge for the father.To this, he started the difficult revenge course, launched the life and death contest with Claudius. Finally, sent out sword the revenge to Claudius
Hamlet is a man with contradictory,he had many chances to kill Claudius,but he hesitated,which reflects the religious thought poisons.
“To be, or not to be, that is the question”.But after answering this question, what comes next? To be in what kind of ways may bring you the value of life? And is the value precious enough for you to continue living? These are questions that can never be solved.
Hamlet chose to live, in order to revenge the tragic death of his honest father, the Danish king. On account of Hamlet was so kind, he missed the best chance of killing his uncle, the murderer of his father. The uncle, who was the new king, devised several plans to kill Hamlet, indirectly killed Hamlet’s beloved Ophelia、Ophelia’s brother and father, and Hamlet’s mother, the new queen who was married to his uncle.
These tragedies finally forced Hamlet to make his decision, and stabbed the sword of revenge to his uncle. Unfortunately, Hamlet was already hurt by a sword with poison on it and would be dead quickly at the moment. It was the kindness and hesitation made him fail.
For his father, died while having a grasping dream and went to hell for that. Hamlet didn’t kill his uncle while he was praying because if he killed him at that time, he would have gone to heaven. Hamlet didn’t want to return good for evil, this irresolute nature caused the failure of his revenge. But why would god send a person to heaven or hell only considering what he’s thinking about at the last moment of life
“Hamlet” about to complete in 1601. It is above all a plot of revenge tragedy of ups and downs, the most fascinating is that Hamlets “hesitation”: his revenge delay action until the last minute plot development. Dramatic beginning, there ghost of the kings of the things Claudius murdered Hamlet informed, ready to go on a revenge.
However, Hamlet worried that this is “the devil” mischief, or the death of his father because of his depression caused by the sky, so the words do not believe in ghosts, but rather trying to view Claudius of a “play within the play” a reflection of themselves to determine whether he is the culprit. He could at confession by Claudius when he was killed, but out of religious considerations and do not want to start at this time, the other into heaven.
Until he and Leietisi fencing, his mother mistakenly drank the original Claudius poisoned wine prepared for him to die, he was struggling to Pichu sword of vengeance, and he eventually fell in bloody revenge.
英语作文：哈姆雷特读后感
Created in 1600 —— 1601 Hamlet had been admired for centuries. Is to at the moment, still feel his vocal. And all this is not the plot, also not only only is excellent literary technique, it is reflected by the problem. In general,
It describes a kind of extremely primitive, people.
The hero Hamlet first dealing with your original ideal world. At the start of the benefits in some Hamlet “childhood”, he did you experience any huge setback, living environment is more simple, always learning western orthodoxy. But in the end, noble, to adore the father died, less than a month is virtuous mother remarried his uncle to usurp the throne. This made him wonder in the world. And after this doubt directly contributed to his hesitation. He realized that they are not perfect it, chastity but desire, moral victory over greed. He thinks you should go to revenge, but the moral person is his mother; His uncle killed his father and he is a person, is a person's thoughts. But even if revenge success, again how? He said: “to be or not to be, this is a question worth thinking about” life is a pain, but the fear of death and have less absolute. He met a problem, can't answer is unavoidable.
Hamlet's situation is not the only, the life of big hands to hold each one is so tight.(.)
The old king's death, which are not related and queen. But as a woman she faces two kinds of selection, it is moral or desire. She chose the latter. However she scorned by the Hamlet and criticism, moral emptiness has brought her considerable pain, in fact, the queen is a kind person, she is not morally repugnant. She is to choose what kind of misfortune, not in the selection of your own destiny.
The new king, the uncle usurped the throne, he is the biggest villain in the play leading role. He wanted to the throne, and to the queen with desire. But the king was others. Is his brother, he don't deserve the throne. He, like all of the faces the loss of the ideal world in my heart. But he strenuously to win, but at the moment, he was a hero general spirit, he bravely to fight for originally do not belong to own. But it is also the tragedy. He paid the price, his hands stained with the blood of others, cannot repent. In later, he found Hamlet after knowing the truth, he began to save themselves may lose the happiness of life. He hovered between sin and rational, in the end he didn't jump out, died in his own sword.
Were one to have the profound hatred, were one to avenge and harm his family who seems too far to harm, he would be either a hero or a monster. Should he fight the unbeatable foe and right the wrong, should he bear with unbearable sorrow, should he ruin himself in twisted enthusiasm, he would be Hamlet.
Among all the masterpieces of William Shakespeare, “Hamlet”， undoubtedly is worshipped and as one of the most successful and admired tragedies, while the character Hamlet remains one of the most loved dramatis personas in all-time history of literature.
To have read Shakespeare's “Romeo and Juliet” by the age of 16, I was moved to tears, while having no empathy with his another great one “Tempest”。 Presumably when I get 60 or older, I could be wise enough to understand the latter, but find it nothing worthwhile to go over the former one, where lays a romantic story that the only youngsters are addicted to. But it's a fact that whenever in our lifetime after gaining such experiences as getting through hard times, or, finding a real self, from “Hamlet”， we always find something that we consider as perpetuation, which is worth deep thoughts. This is because it highlights Hamlet's choices of life, choices made under certain circumstances of history and society, requested by the fate extraordinary to Hamlet himself, but ordinary to mankind. That is, to some extent, his experiences make a similar one to ours and, his destiny is something we're facing sometime in our own lives.
We're possibly the same. We explore the truth in the dark. We discover facts from the mist. We lose ourselves in determinations. We trespass on which we're forbid to be, hesitates at love and hatred, and struggle to rebuild system of values and spiritual prop in a world without standards and scales of standards.
Hamlet couldn't have been perfect. He is very much a person motivated by irrational enthusiasm, impetuous enough to kill Polonius only to find it's a mistake as the victim is not the king. But somehow it is for his poor enthusiasm, his weakness of humanity, that Hamlet touches countless readers, as everyone makes out himself from the ill-fated prince.
Hamlet's “revenge” isn't so much simply the killing of Claudius, as it is the purging of all the rottenness in the Danish court. And although it costs him his life, he succeeds.
At some time, we all consider how much wrong there is in the world. “Hamlet” gives us a chance to watch an ordinary person consciously choose to say “No!” to the world's wrongness and falsities, and to strike back with power. William Shakespeare held up the mirror to something in us that is precious.
I hear Hamlet thinking, “Too many people waste too much effort doing things that are not worthwhile. It's a bad world, and I am far from a perfect human being. We all end up dead in the end. So I am going to do something worthwhile, and do it right.”
I hear him wondering, “What is a man, If his chief good and market of his time. Is but to sleep and feed? A beast, no more.”
I hear him whispering “To be, or not to be, aye, there's the point. To die, to sleep, is that all? Aye, all.”
That makes a hero to me, regardless of his blindness and madness which haunt everyone for a while in his time. Thousands of readers may have thousands of their own Hamlet, but there's something that stays the same, that Hamlet dares to run, where the brave dare not go. That's his quest.
Thinks about it.
On Sister Carrie
Carrie was such an ordinary rural girl at the beginning of the story. Sitting on the seat of a bus, she couldn’t help feeling exciting at the sight of the metropolis’ spectacle. She was impressed deeply by large crowd on the avenue, the spacious square or tall buildings.
Far more different from other heroines, Carrie was not a plain pure angel like Snow-white, nor was she brave enough to be a heroine of revolutionist or even a reformer, nor was she so clever as to be a successful career woman who start from scratch.
What attracted her most, after her entering this huge metropolis was the incredible fineries, fashion shoes, smart handbags displaying in the shop windows, the jewellerys shining brightly behind the glass. She dreamed that one day, she could wear all of these, jogging gracefully into the most luxurious hotel with focused sights of admiration.
And this was not merely a dream. Because she had large eyes which can earn others’ sympathy, even love. She had wonderful figure which can win others’ hearts. However, anything she got, anywhere she reached, had not come from her ambition. Things happened, and then she accepted. That’s what she had just done ? just to accept willingly from the bottom of her heart. She was not at all an evil woman who would give anything for the fortune or fame. However, she would give uo something for a better life when her instinct defeated her intellect.
That was Carrie, a girl had her own desire, a human being just like many others in the realistic world.
There’s one sentence written in chapter VIII:” When this jangle of free-will instinct shall have been adjusted, when perfect understanding has given the former the power to replace the latter entirely, man will no longer vary.” However, how many people can go that further.
And I want to quote another sentence to wind up my essay:
“In Carrie ? as in how many of our wordings do they not? ? instinct and reason, desire and understanding, were at war for the mastery.”
“ Hamlet ” of Shakespear is a clASSical representative work. This book certainly does not have the big difference in the superficial plot with the historical fable, spoke or the Danish prince the story which revenged for the father, in which fills the rank smell of blood violence and dies.Just like the dramatis personae Horatio said: “ you may hear to to rape massacre, the unusual repair behavior, the dark center decision, accidental slaughter, borrows the hand murder , as well as falls into suicide result.” Windingly elects the plot, tightly centers on the revenge to launch. Hamlet Wittenberg hurries back the home in a hurry from Germany, is attends his father's funeral, enables him to accept, he not catches up with father's funeral, actually witnessed the mother and the Uncle Claudius' wedding ceremony, this had caused Hamm the Wright suspicion at the heart, added night above meets in the royal palace castle with father's ghost, the ghost sorrow sued, this pile atrocity was Uncle Hamlet the behavior, and wanted him to revenge for the father.To this, he started the difficult revenge course, launched the life and death contest with Claudius. Finally, sent out sword the revenge to Claudius Hamlet is a man with contradictory,he had many chances to kill Claudius,but he hesitated,which reflects the religious thought poisons.
“ Hamlet ” of Shakespear is a classical representative work. This book does not have the big in the plot with the historical fable, spoke or the Danish prince the story which revenged for the father, in which fills the rank smell of blood violence and dies.Just like the dramatis personae Horatio said: “ you may hear to to rape massacre, the unusual repair behavior, the dark center decision, accidental , borrows the hand murder , as well as falls into suicide result.” Windingly elects the plot, tightly centers on the revenge to launch. Hamlet Wittenberg hurries back the home in a hurry from Germany, is attends his father's funeral, enables him to accept, he not catches up with father's funeral, actually witnessed the mother and the Uncle Claudius' wedding ceremony, this had caused Hamm the Wright at the heart, added night above meets in the royal palace castle with father's ghost, the ghost sorrow sued, this pile atrocity was Uncle Hamlet the behavior, and wanted him to revenge for the father.To this, he started the revenge course, launched the life and death contest with Claudius. Finally, sent out sword the revenge to Claudius
Hamlet is a man with contradictory,he had many chances to kill Claudius,but he hesitated,which reflects the thought poisons.
“To be, or not to be, that is the question”。 But after answering this question, what comes next? To be in what kind of ways may bring you the value of life? And is the value precious enough for you to continue living? These are questions that can never be solved.
Hamlet chose to live, in order to revenge the tragic death of his honest father, the Danish king. On account of Hamlet was so kind, he missed the best chance of killing his uncle, the murderer of his father. The uncle, who was the new king, devised several plans to kill Hamlet, indirectly killed Hamlet’s beloved Ophelia、Ophelia’s brother and father, and Hamlet’s mother, the new queen who was married to his uncle.
These tragedies finally forced Hamlet to make his decision, and stabbed the sword of revenge to his uncle. Unfortunately, Hamlet was already hurt by a sword with poison on it and would be dead quickly at the moment. It was the kindness and hesitation made him fail.
For his father, died while having a grasping dream and went to hell for that. Hamlet didn’t kill his uncle while he was praying because if he killed him at that time, he would have gone to heaven. Hamlet didn’t want to return good for evil, this irresolute nature caused the failure of his revenge. But why would god send a person to heaven or hell only considering what he’s thinking about at the last moment of lif.
Created in 1600 —— 1601 Hamlet had been admired for centuries. Is to at the moment, still feel his vocal. And all this is not the plot, also not only only is excellent literary technique, it is reflected by the problem. In general,
It describes a kind of extremely primitive, people.
The hero Hamlet first dealing with your original ideal world. At the start of the benefits in some Hamlet “childhood”, he did you experience any huge setback, living environment is more simple, always learning western orthodoxy. But in the end, noble, to adore the father died, less than a month is virtuous mother remarried his uncle to usurp the throne. This made him wonder in the world. And after this doubt directly contributed to his hesitation. He realized that they are not perfect it, chastity but desire, moral victory over greed. He thinks you should go to revenge, but the moral person is his mother; His uncle killed his father and he is a person, is a persons thoughts. But even if revenge success, again how? He said: “to be or not to be, this is a question worth thinking about” life is a pain, but the fear of death and have less absolute. He met a problem, cant answer is unavoidable.
Hamlets situation is not the only, the life of big hands to hold each one is so tight.(.)
The old kings death, which are not related and queen. But as a woman she faces two kinds of selection, it is moral or desire. She chose the latter. However she scorned by the Hamlet and criticism, moral emptiness has brought her considerable pain, in fact, the queen is a kind person, she is not morally repugnant. She is to choose what kind of misfortune, not in the selection of your own destiny.
The new king, the uncle usurped the throne, he is the biggest villain in the play leading role. He wanted to the throne, and to the queen with desire. But the king was others. Is his brother, he dont deserve the throne. He, like all of the faces the loss of the ideal world in my heart. But he strenuously to win, but at the moment, he was a hero general spirit, he bravely to fight for originally do not belong to own. But it is also the tragedy. He paid the price, his hands stained with the blood of others, cannot repent. In later, he found Hamlet after knowing the truth, he began to save themselves may lose the happiness of life. He hovered between sin and rational, in the end he didnt jump out, died in his own sword.
他是莎士比亚笔下的一位传奇人物，他是丹麦的一位王子，他是世界文学史上一个经典形象，他就是哈姆雷特。读莎士比亚的《哈姆莱特》，感受到的是杯具的美丽与伟大，莎士比亚所塑造的每个人物每一幕都那么每句话都有着戏剧的崇高。
《哈姆雷特》是莎士比亚杯具中的代表作品，这个剧本整整被推崇了几个世纪。它突出地反映了作者的人文主义思想，是一个时代的缩影。就是此刻，我们依然能够感觉到它的震撼人心。而这震撼不只来源于情节，也不仅仅仅是出色的文学手法，更重要的是它所体现出来的问题。它在思想资料上到达了前所未有的深度和广度，深刻的揭示出封建末期社会的罪恶与本质特征，同时，它还提出了一个关于命运的问题。
哈姆雷特是文艺复兴时期人文主义者的理想人物。他是王子，按照传统，是王权的当然继承者。但是，他的完美前途被颠倒了的时代颠倒了。戏一开头，作者就展现了一幅丑恶的社会画面：国家发生宫廷政变，国王被害，阴谋家窃取了王位；王后改嫁；满朝臣子趋炎附势等等。世界仿佛到了末日。于是这个王子发出了复仇的吼声。人们强烈地感受到这是“时代的灵魂”本身在呼喊。哈姆雷特本是个正直、乐观、有理想的青年，在正常的环境下，他能够成为一位贤明君主；但是现实的社会迫使他不得不装疯卖傻，进行复仇。他是英国那个特定的动荡不安时代的产物。
哈姆雷特是一个英雄形象，他很有心计，在敌强我弱的恶劣状况下，他敢于针锋相对地进行斗争，他击破了奸王设下的―个个圈套，在每一回合的斗争中，哈姆雷特都显得形象高大。但哈姆雷特决非“完人”，他虽然善于思索，却优柔寡断；他虽然受到人民的爱戴，却并不坚信人民。尽管哈姆雷特有令人钦佩的才能，竭力想除旧布新，但他总是郁郁不乐，迟疑不决，他始终是孤立的。这就注定了他与丑恶同归于尽的悲惨命运。他是一个巨人型的杯具。
哈姆雷特的死，是一场杯具，却也是对他最好的结果。当将命运的枷锁揭开了，他的职责也就应是放下了。生存在这个世界上对于哈姆雷特，失去了任何的好处。
莎士比亚的哈姆雷特，他的形象经典，不仅仅在于塑造了一个为父报仇的英雄式形象，更是正因他的英雄行为下的懦弱，他是一个传统好处下的一个大的突破。在一个痛苦的转变过程中，哈姆雷特从一个孩子成长为一个英勇的战士，这个过程也是我们每一个人都务必经历过的，因此每个人身上都有哈姆雷特的影子，他的形象也就更加引起我们的关注。
这部戏剧突出了人与人之间的仇恨，对金钱、权利的欲望。对于哈姆雷特的死，是很悲痛中也引起了我们一些思考。莎士比亚不属于一个时代而属于全世纪，他的戏剧就象灿烂星空中的北斗，永远为人们指引着方向。
在西方戏剧史上，莎士比亚绝对算得上一个举足轻重的人物。《哈姆雷特》是他的最具代表性的作品。在《哈姆雷特》中，有很多能让人引起思考的地方，也有很多值得我们去细细咀嚼、体会的地方。作为一个女性，我自然是对浪漫的感情故事最感兴趣，所以，今日我想就剧中哈姆雷特与欧菲利亚的感情问题来发表一点我浅薄的看法。
在文中，欧菲利亚第一次在剧中出现，是在第一幕的第三景，她送雷尔提回到法国的时候。从雷尔提对欧菲利亚说：“至于哈姆雷特对你之兴趣那只是年轻人之暂时热度......”从雷尔提的这番话中，我们能够得知，哈姆雷特在这之前就已经对欧菲利亚表达过自我的爱慕之情。
而在剧本演到那里之时，哈姆雷特还没有去与鬼魂会面，所以说，他这时还不明白他父亲死亡的真相，也还没有制定他的复仇计划，所以，这时候，他对欧菲利亚是没有任何理由去产生利用或是报复的想法的，他对欧菲利亚，就是一个青年人对心爱女子正常的迷恋与爱慕。
剧本之后往下看，应对雷尔提对欧菲利亚的警告，欧菲利亚有点不甘心的问：“仅是如此而已？”她的问话中，透露着一丝小女生的那种听到别人说自我情人不好的时候的不舒服的心理。恋爱中的女孩子都会觉得自我的情人是完美无双的，并且相信对方对自我是真心实意。所以，当雷尔提对欧菲利亚说哈姆雷特对她只是年轻人的暂时兴趣，不是真正的爱的时候，她才会不甘心的反问那一句：“仅是如此而已？”
并且，在波隆尼尔对欧菲利亚说哈姆雷特给她的感情是虚伪的时候，欧菲利亚惊讶的辩解：“可是，父亲，他是有诚意的在追求我......他也曾郑重的对天发誓过......”但她的想法立刻就被波隆尼尔反驳了。欧菲利亚十分尊重她的父亲，所以也没有继续跟她父亲争论这件事了。所以，能够看出，欧菲利亚也是爱着哈姆雷特的。
可是这份感情并没有得到世俗的支持。欧菲利亚的父亲波隆尼尔和哥哥雷尔提都认为哈姆雷特只是在玩弄欧菲利亚的感情，所以一致让她离哈姆雷特远一点。哥哥和父亲都是家庭中很有地位和尊严的人，对于他们的指令，欧菲利亚不得不服从，只能对哈姆雷特冷待，和他坚持必须的距离。
接下来的情节，就是哈姆雷特得知父亲死亡的真相，决定要复仇了。很巧的是，哈姆雷特装疯的第一个对象，就是欧菲利亚。
欧菲利亚发现哈姆雷特不对劲，第一时间就是告诉自我最尊敬信赖的父亲波隆尼尔，她在剧中是这么说的：“他用力的扭住了我的手腕，排我于一臂之距......目不转睛的盯着我的脸，好像想画它一般......然后悲惨的深叹了一口气，就好像想在一口气中叹出他的胴体及生命一般......出门也不看路，因为他的眼睛一向不停地瞅着我呢。”从这段话中哈姆雷特的表现中能够看出，他在应对欧菲利亚的时候是饱含深情的。哈姆雷特的那一声长叹，在我看来，也是他对和欧菲利亚之间的感情的终结的遗憾和不舍吧。因为复仇，他不得不舍弃对欧菲利亚的深情，心中难免有苦痛与遗憾，所以才会在哈姆雷特离开欧菲利亚的时候，他的眼光却一刻也没有离开过她，想把她深深地记在脑海中。
但哈姆雷特还是深深的伤害了美丽的欧菲莉亚的心。在第三幕的第一景中，欧菲利亚想要退回哈姆雷特曾送给她的礼物，她说：“尊贵的殿下，你明白你以往有过，并且当时还添加了你的香甜蜜语，使它格外珍贵，此刻既然此芳已散，您就收回这些吧，对有情人来说送礼者若无诚，那此礼就会失去意义......”以往格外珍贵的礼物到此刻却失去了意义，不正是暗含了欧菲利亚对哈姆雷特态度的转变吗？从分外珍惜到心灰意冷。感情，永远都不能参染任何一丝杂质。
在他们俩接下来的对话中，哈姆雷特一遍又一遍让欧菲利亚去尼姑庵，着深深的刺痛了欧菲利亚的心，但换在哈姆雷特的角度来看，这又何尝不是一种保护欧菲利亚的做法呢？
哈姆莱特之所以呼喊，叫奥菲利亚去尼姑庵，并不是他发疯，也不是他对奥菲利亚的无情，而更是他对心上人的深爱。
当哈姆雷特经过鬼魂，得知父亲死亡真相时，他就再也无心沉溺于儿女情长了，于是他开始装疯，说看似糊涂的话。我认为他的目的之一就是为了保护奥菲利娅，他不想让奥菲利娅牵扯进这场复仇行动，他想独自去应对一切。于是他数次斥责奥菲利亚：“进尼姑庵去吧”，在我看来，他认为尼姑庵远离尘世、远离荒淫与罪恶，是这个世界最终一块净土。经过父亲的死他看到了世界的肮脏，人性的残忍，他实在不想看到美丽纯洁的奥菲利亚也变得像他母亲那样，所以他叫圣洁的欧菲利亚去尼姑庵，也就是不想欧菲利亚被现实的污垢所污染。
但这个时候，欧菲利亚的心已经被彻底伤透了，她对感情最完美的幻想都已经终结。剧情发展到后面，哈姆雷特无意刺死欧菲利亚父亲波隆尼尔这件事成了压死骆驼的最终一根稻草。一边是尊敬信任的父亲，一边是心心念念的爱人，在重大的精神压力之下，欧菲利亚真的疯掉了。
在欧菲利亚疯掉不久之后，她就坠河而死了，但她到底是自杀还是不慎落水还不得而知。在欧菲利亚葬礼的时候，哈姆雷特回来了。看着心爱人的尸体，哈姆雷特悲痛万分，对着欧菲利亚的哥哥雷尔提最终说出来内心最真实的话：“我爱欧菲利亚，四万个兄弟之爱加起来也不足我所给予她的爱。”这是文章中最明确的提现哈姆雷特对欧菲利亚感情的地方。
哈姆雷特与欧菲利亚虽然互相爱慕，但由于国仇家恨等等原因而不能在一齐，最终酿成了杯具，实在是可怜可叹。
★ 哈姆雷特读后感
★ 哈姆雷特 读后感
★ 哈姆雷特读后感
